The Typo Topic

Program aborts? Network configuration? Graphic errors? Bugs? Post your question here.
1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
posted on December 6th, 2010, 4:12 am
true :sweatdrop: the nova fleet supply tooltip got messed up to, fixed both (as well as a bunch of other typos mentioned earlier)
keep them comming :thumbsup:
posted on December 7th, 2010, 5:09 pm
Dispatch Containers passive states it gives a +1 bonus to offense and defense, when in reality it gives a +1/+2 bonus to offense/defense  :sweatdrop:
posted on December 7th, 2010, 8:30 pm
Last edited by 086gf on December 7th, 2010, 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Level 3 Newton upgrade has some missing words.

A new set of main computer cores allow
         a (what?) to connect to the LCARS of a target
         ship to optimize (what?) and its shield harmony


Or is the first part "...allows a connection too"?
posted on December 7th, 2010, 8:34 pm
Last edited by Tyler on December 7th, 2010, 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I think the second one has an extra word and should be 'to optimize its shield harmony'.

Optec wrote:true :sweatdrop: the nova fleet supply tooltip got messed up to, fixed both (as well as a bunch of other typos mentioned earlier)
keep them comming :thumbsup:

Shouldn't that be 'coming'?
posted on December 8th, 2010, 6:47 pm
The new supplies for destroyed ships section of both warp-in tooltips say fonds instead of funds.

If a Warp-In vessel is being destroyed,
        you will have to support the Starfleet
        construction fonds with a small amount
        of supplies
posted on December 16th, 2010, 12:17 pm
Also, shouldn't it say 'is destroyed', rather than 'is being destroyed'? You don't get charged until after it dies.

Is the veteran passive of the Excelsior-II named after the ship todesign it? Because it is called the Miron Refit, while the shp is called USS Miran.
ketchup_chips
User avatar
posted on December 17th, 2010, 9:13 pm
Increases damage dealt by an amount equal to 0.8 percent of the target's total hit points.


Is this a mistake? 0.80 is 80%, but 0.8% is the same as 0.008! 0.8 percent is barely anything at all! If the target has 60 hit points, that would be 60*0.008= a bonus of 0.48 points! Although maybe I don't know how the hitpoint system works, perhaps ships have hundreds or thousands of these points.

Attachments

screentyp.jpg
posted on December 17th, 2010, 9:45 pm
nope, that's correct. Consider an outpost, for example, with over 6000 hitpoints
posted on December 18th, 2010, 9:06 pm
Found another with manual targetting.

[quote]percent efficiency of many pssive abilities
        by reducing their negative effects
   
posted on December 19th, 2010, 4:58 pm
thanks :D keep them coming, squash the bugs!
posted on December 19th, 2010, 6:02 pm
Optec wrote:nope, that's correct. Consider an outpost, for example, with over 6000 hitpoints


And in that case the extra damage will be 48 extra damage per shot
posted on December 19th, 2010, 7:31 pm
Tyler wrote:Is the veteran passive of the Excelsior-II named after the ship todesign it? Because it is called the Miron Refit, while the shp is called USS Miran.


I vote we change both the typo and the real name (whichever is which) to Myron

Image


bonus points to those that get the refrence.
posted on December 19th, 2010, 7:38 pm
Vote?! This is not a democracy!  :lol:

I don't like ys in vowel positions, so I suggest keeping it Miran.
posted on December 19th, 2010, 10:45 pm
Fed-klin mixed tech repair ship, it's special says it can be used when sheilds are active. It should say engines as tractors have no issue with shields.
posted on January 1st, 2011, 4:34 am
Cluster Torpedo Launcher description reads:
This special torpedoes carry more then one warhead...


should read:
These special torpedoes carry more than one warhead...
1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests