STXII 2012 script is coming to gather.
What's your favourite episode? How is romulan ale brewed? - Star Trek in general :-)
posted on March 8th, 2011, 9:48 pm
Myles wrote: like hotter dilithium that lets u go to warp 10....
NOT hotter, more stable. which makes since because the other stuff fractured at higher warp frequencys. the new stuff didn't. don't take stuff outta context
posted on March 8th, 2011, 9:53 pm
I don't see how a new form of Dilithium that remains stable at higher speeds would allow you to go faster than with regular stuff, though; it may survive longer but wouldn't increase the abilities of the engine itself.
That would imply Starfleet engines could already achieve ludicrous speed, with Dilitihium being all that kept them back.
EDIT: Oh god, we're talking about Threshold!
That would imply Starfleet engines could already achieve ludicrous speed, with Dilitihium being all that kept them back.
EDIT: Oh god, we're talking about Threshold!
posted on March 8th, 2011, 9:59 pm
Tyler wrote:That would imply Starfleet engines could already achieve ludicrous speed, with Dilitihium being all that kept them back.
No cuz it flew apart anyway, they had to make (belana Maquis) mods to get it to work.
then pairs still evolved and grounded the project.
posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:00 pm
i gotta go. i pick this up later
posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:05 pm
Styer Crisis wrote:No cuz it flew apart anyway, they had to make (belana Maquis) mods to get it to work.
then pairs still evolved and grounded the project.
It broke up because the ship kept being torn from the nacelles; the 2 parts of the ship travelled at different speeds. The engines weren't the problem, the hull was.
posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:08 pm
Last edited by Anonymous on March 8th, 2011, 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dominus_Noctis wrote:I guess people here haven't heard of charm, colour, up, down etc

he hasnt heard of it, explain it to him

Dominus_Noctis wrote:Science doesn't have to have 15 syllables arranged haphazardly to describe something complex
DNA is a mouthful. some hormones can be pretty nasty, to pronounce that is

Styer Crisis wrote:NOT hotter, more stable. which makes since because the other stuff fractured at higher warp frequencys. the new stuff didn't. don't take stuff outta context
lol i was taking the piss out of it. magic new dilithium that "remains stable at higher warp freqs" and allows them to go infinitely fast.....
ninjad, yes we're talking about threshold.
Styer Crisis wrote:No cuz it flew apart anyway, they had to make (belana Maquis) mods to get it to work.
then pairs still evolved and grounded the project.
that was in the holodeck, they fixed it with duct tape.
they said that the hull would "depolarise" at the speed required, ripping the fuselage from the nacelles cos the fuselage was travelling faster than the nacelles, despite the nacelles being the bit that do the engine-y things while the fuselage warp core generates the power. but anyway, the problem is that the metal depolarises, and so paris has the brilliant idea of installing a "depolarisation field" around the fuselage, which from the way it sounds, would be a field that causes/aids depolarisation, which was the problem... hair of the dog doesnt work on humans, let alone infinite improbability drives super duper (i dont wanna say transwarp lol) warp drives.
all they did was add a device that a criminal pilot idiot could devise while in a mess hall, which fixed the problem pretty quick, sounds like starfleet ships (not even starships, shuttles, which normally coudn't get close to starship speeds) could already go infinitely fast if they just had some magic crystals :whistles:
posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:17 pm
Myles wrote:like hotter dilithium that lets u go to warp 10....
That was one of the sillier episodes of Voyager (which is saying a lot), as warp10 is basicly something warp drive cant surpass (as warp 10 is basicly the speed of light in subspace, to go faster you have to find something else )
Quatre wrote:JarJartrek
Pretty much. Execpt since it's Kirk (cause JJ is too lazy to make new characthers) you have a half dressed Orion going 'messa luv u' (and supernovas traveling at high warp speeds)
posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:53 pm
Myles wrote:
he hasnt heard of it, explain it to him
DNA is a mouthful. some hormones can be pretty nasty, to pronounce that is
That's why I said doesn't have to be

Charm, colour, strangeness and other such awesomely funny terms (like 'barn' - units of length squared) are particle physics terms (i.e. quarks)

posted on March 8th, 2011, 10:59 pm
'Red Matter' actually fits the Star Trek standard, oddly enough. When the standard method of getting scientific terms is 'pick 2 unrelated words that sound cool and combine them', colors were bound to be added to the mix sooner or later.
We need a thread for listing the technobabble from Voyager and what it would really mean...
We need a thread for listing the technobabble from Voyager and what it would really mean...
posted on March 8th, 2011, 11:15 pm
Dominus_Noctis wrote:That's why I said doesn't have to be
i got you, i just wanted an excuse to make a (poor) sexist joke about hormones.
Dominus_Noctis wrote:Charm, colour, strangeness and other such awesomely funny terms (like 'barn' - units of length squared) are particle physics terms (i.e. quarks)
i prefer funny short words, to technically nice, but long words.
Tyler wrote:We need a thread for listing the technobabble from Voyager and what it would really mean...
posts can only hold 20000 characters i believe, list would need multiple pages of posts. and would probably count as spam.
posted on March 9th, 2011, 12:20 am
Does everything always have to come to argument over stuff like this? Are human beings incapable of communicating without verbal broadsiding? And if you actually watch Star Trek XI, you notice that it has far less weapons fire than Nemesis or even Insurrection. Also there is an explanation of what Red Matter is, it is just not in the movie. It is an incredibley dense material that can collapse on itself to create a gravity well.
posted on March 9th, 2011, 12:24 am
captkirk222 wrote:Does everything always have to come to argument over stuff like this? Are human beings incapable of communicating without verbal broadsiding?
Is that a rhetorical question?
posted on March 9th, 2011, 12:27 am
Yeah, partially anyways. But there are times that I see stuff like this on many places and it almost always devolves into petty bickering.
posted on March 9th, 2011, 12:30 am
Last edited by Tyler on March 9th, 2011, 12:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pretty much everything gets debated, since forums get many people of differing views. Usually, they end on an 'agree to disagree' basis if they get serious enough.
Well, they do here at least...
Well, they do here at least...
posted on March 9th, 2011, 12:33 am
True, very true. It is just a bit sad thought that so much conflict can come from something that I think was Gene Roddenberry's hope for a better future for everyone.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests