Guide Problems/Errors

guide.fleetops.net
1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 25
posted on June 8th, 2010, 7:28 pm
Or maybe it means the Bomber, not the Destroyer?
posted on June 8th, 2010, 9:49 pm
Last edited by Dominus_Noctis on June 10th, 2010, 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Corrected :)

EDIT: indeed it was the destroyer ;)
posted on June 9th, 2010, 11:04 am
Tyler wrote:Or maybe it means the Bomber, not the Destroyer?


bomber was already mentioned earlier, im pretty sure it was the destroyer intended.
posted on June 22nd, 2010, 8:01 am
The rank images are tiny and only show the X box in their place.
posted on June 22nd, 2010, 9:28 pm
Tyler wrote:The rank images are tiny and only show the X box in their place.


The Database will be replaced soon, so the code is not necessarily compatible anymore I presume  ^-^
posted on June 26th, 2010, 8:40 pm
Last edited by Myles on June 26th, 2010, 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
fed strat page for mayson says this:

When Starfleet Science is complete queue up Canaverals and research Hyper Impulse Drive. Use Hyper Impulse Drive when being attacked by short ranged or mainly torpedo armed vessels or to escape and repair.


i think u mean sabre instead of canverals, and why produce sabres only when SS is done, sabres can be made from start.
posted on June 26th, 2010, 8:43 pm
Last edited by Tyler on June 26th, 2010, 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The 'plans' section Federation Intelligence Report mentions a fourth avatar planned.
The fourth Federation Avatar planned for the future is from SFI (Star Fleet Intelligence)


Is that a typo, or are they adding a Starfleet Tactical avatar I haven't heard about?
posted on June 26th, 2010, 9:06 pm
Tyler wrote:The 'plans' section Federation Intelligence Report mentions a fourth avatar planned.
Is that a typo, or are they adding a Starfleet Tactical avatar I haven't heard about?


I'm not sure what Starfleet Tactical is, but this is not an admiral that appears in official ST canon :)

myleswolfers wrote:fed strat page for mayson says this:

i think u mean sabre instead of canverals, and why produce sabres only when SS is done, sabres can be made from start.


Well, basically the next line should explain that where I mention to maintain continuous production of Sabers when Canaverals are not available :) . I can try to make that clearer  ^-^
posted on June 26th, 2010, 9:12 pm
Last edited by Tyler on June 26th, 2010, 9:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Starfleet Tactical is branch of Starfleet. I'm guessing it was a typo about Intel being the fourth avatar?
posted on June 26th, 2010, 9:23 pm
Nope, it is Starfleet Intelligence :)
posted on June 26th, 2010, 9:28 pm
What I was asking was 'was fourth a typo, or is there *add random word* also planned'. Starfleet Tactical was the first random thing I thought of. (because I like that division).

Because unless it's a typo, Intel being the fourth avatar implies there's another.
posted on June 26th, 2010, 10:46 pm
No typo at all :D

Each faction will have four avatars eventually - and maybe more in the far flung future. I'm sure you will hear more about this in a news post  B)
posted on June 28th, 2010, 7:56 am
Will the avatars be an element of the faction re-dos?
posted on June 28th, 2010, 9:48 pm
Redshirt wrote:Will the avatars be an element of the faction re-dos?


That would be a question best left to the developers if they so choose to answer it :)
posted on June 30th, 2010, 2:29 am
Dom, I dunno if it is incompatibility with the Opera browser, but a lot of the images, especially in the mixtech section... just appear as blank frames. Are there missing images?
1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 25
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests