The Federation
Post ideas and suggestions on new features or improvements here.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 1:10 pm
Memory Alpha considers the Steamrunner a "Heavy Frigate" Steamrunner class - Memory Alpha, the Star Trek Wiki
With these specs:
DITL gives the steamrunner these specs:
So memory alpha and DITL differ some. I have to admit the Type 10 phaser emitters seem a little over the top since that's the same type as can be found on the Galaxy. Also the Intrepid class wields Type VIII phasers while it is replacing the Steamrunner.
But either heavy frigate or light cruiser it would be an interesting addition.
With these specs:
* Type: Heavy Frigate
* Dimensions: Length, 375 meters; beam, 270.9 meters; height, 79.5 meters.
* Compliment: 200 officers and crew
* Performance: Warp 9.6 for 12 hours .
* Armament: Four type-10 phaser emitters, two photon torpedo launchers.
DITL gives the steamrunner these specs:
Affiliation : Federation
Type : Light Cruiser
Commissioned : 2342 - 2363, class remains in service
Dimensions : Length : 244 m2
Beam : 160 m
Height : 40 m
Decks : 9
Mass : 375,000 metric tons
Crew : 185
Armament : 6 x Type VIII phaser arrays, total output 13,000 TeraWatts
2 x Pulse fire photon torpedo tube3
2 x Standard photon torpedo tube with 155 rounds
Defence Systems : Standard shield system, total capacity 891,000 TeraJoules
Standard Duranium/Tritanium Double hull plus 4.8 cm High density armour.
Standard level Structural Integrity Field
Warp Speeds
(TNG scale) : Normal Cruise : 6
Maximum Cruise : 8.8
Maximum Rated : 9.5
So memory alpha and DITL differ some. I have to admit the Type 10 phaser emitters seem a little over the top since that's the same type as can be found on the Galaxy. Also the Intrepid class wields Type VIII phasers while it is replacing the Steamrunner.
But either heavy frigate or light cruiser it would be an interesting addition.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 2:56 pm
I miss the FC steamrunner, Proper torps and Phasers.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 2:58 pm
I forgot the Torps from FC.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 3:54 pm
Lol.
I'm going to break yet another lance for the Steamrunner. Read this article and i dare you not to get exited about this class.
I'm going to break yet another lance for the Steamrunner. Read this article and i dare you not to get exited about this class.
Steamrunner Class Starship
Class Overview
One of the last vessels designed and launched before the debacle at Wolf 359, the Steamrunner Class of starships was the quintessential utility vessel of starfleet. The class was originally designed as a replacement for the elder statesman of the fleet, the Miranda class, in the role of cruiser and deep space fleet escort.
The Steamrunner class is equipped with modest scientific and diplomatic quarters and sensors, and has proved to be a capable stand-alone deep space vessel.
Construction History
The Steamrunner Class was born out of necessity. The Miranda Class had long since past its expected service life by more than 75 years. In that time, Starfleet had yet to find an adequate replacement for the multi-role Miranda�s, so the call went out to the Fleetyards of the United Federation of Planets for a new, small, multi-role vessel to replace the Miranda class.
Over ten different designs were submitted to Starfleet. Several of these designs went into production under different contracts, the Norway and Saber Class vessels among those used by Starfleet. The accepted design for the Steamrunner Project was from the Nesrun Shipyards.
Pursuant to Starfleet Exploration Directives 902.3 & 914.5, Starfleet Defense Directives 138.6, 141.1 & 154.7, and Federation Security Council General Policy, the following objectives had been established for the Steamrunner Project:
1. Provide a multi-mission mobile platform for a wide range of scientific and explorative research projects.
2. Replace Miranda, Soyuz, and Merced class Starships as the primary instrument of Federation deep-space defense.
3. Provide autonomous capability for full execution of Federation defensive, cultural, scientific, and explorative policy in deep space or border territory.
4. Serve as a frontline support vehicle during times of war and emergencies.
Construction of the first prototype hull, now designated NX 51000, began in 2350 in Arm 3 of the Nesrun Shipyards. The nacelle / primary hull assembly was completed within the year, and the primary secondary hull and both Primary and Auxiliary Computer Cores were put in place by the end of 2351.
The question of what type of power plant to use for both Impulse and Warp engines. Due to the unique profile of the Steamrunner Class, a standard Impulse and M/ARA configuration had to be abandonded. The debate raged as to just how powerful of a plant the vessel needed until 2353, when the Akira Project began propulsion testing of its own unique warp core and impulse engine configuration.
When the Akira project design team rejected Consolidated Fusion Inc.�s M/ARA and Impulse engine design, Team Steamrunner jumped into the vacuum. Talks between CFI and Project Steamrunner went quickly, and within 2 standard months, the first test Impulse Engines and Warp Core arrived at Nesrun. Owing to the unique design of the Hull, and that the impulse engines were originally designed for a much larger vessel, some severe modifications to the NX 51000 hull took place. The most visible modification was the extraction of the primary Warp deflector array from the primary hull. Because of the necessity of the deflector to Starship survival at high warp speeds, the Deflector was mounted �outboard�, in a pod strung by structural beams between the Warp Nacelles. This unique configuration was not the most efficient manner of reconfiguring the deflector network, but it was the most expedient.
NX 51000 left Arm 3 of the Nesrun Shipyards in 2354 for Impulse engine stress testing near Theta Cygni V. Stress tolerances were well within expected levels, and the hull was towed back to Nesrun for interior compartment completion and final warp testing. The hull, now dubbed the USS Steamrunner, had final compartmentalization completed on December 1, 2354 and took its final shakedown cruise through the new year to January 31, 2355 when she arrived at Sol system for its official launch. By the time the USS Steamrunner entered into service in 2355, her sister ship, the USS Sulaco NCC 50001 was nearing completion at Nesrun, within no less than 10 more hulls being prepared for construction.
At the height of production, both the Nesrun Fleet Yards and the Balkinur Cosmodrome were producing Steamrunner Class vessels. Squat, ugly, but heavily armed for their size, they were slowly supplanting Miranda, Soyuz and Merced class vessels on deep space patrol and survey duties at the very fringes of the Federation. Production of the Steamrunners continued until 2359, when the first of the New Orleans Class vessels began entering service and the vessels outlined in the "Master Plan for the Renewal of the Fleet" began entering service. Despite its solid performance since its introduction, the Steamrunner fell into disfavor with Starfleet Command, who preferred the newer New Orleans class frigate.
The introduction of the New Orleans Class pushed the Steamrunner class out of its traditional role of Deep Space and Diplomatic vessel. The class was retired to refit status as the Steamrunner�s weapons and shielding were upgraded as Starfleet sought to find a mission role for this small, modestly equipped starship. It wasn�t until Wolf 359 and the realization that the Borg posed a clear and present danger to the Federation and her allies and the continued problems with the development of the Defiant Project made the decision easy as to what role the Steamrunner was to play. Soon, the class was refit with new Type X phaser banks and the forward torpedo launcher was made largely automated to allow for a higher volume of firepower. This gave the Steamrunner class unprecedented firepower for its size, second only to the size to firepower ratio presented in the Defiant project vessels. Owing to the number of Steamrunner Class vessels that were in active service, and complexity of the refits ordered by Starfleet, the turn-around time for these �new� Steamrunners was excessive. Over 20 were completed at Utopia Planetia and Station McKinley by the time the second Borg Incursion occurred. Of those 20 Steamrunner Class vessels that participated in the defense of Sector 001 in that battle, 9 Steamrunner class vessels were destroyed, 5 suffered significant enough damage that Starfleet decided to scrap the hulls. Of the six that survived the battle and were still space worthy, the most notable was the USS Appalachia.
By the outbreak of war with the Dominion, the Federation had uprated their entire fleet of Steamrunner class vessels. As losses mounted in the war, production orders began again for the Steamrunner Class vessel. It was a proven design, heavily armed for its size, and was well-suited for combat against Dominion Threat vessels. Production of the Steamrunner fell again on the Nesrun Fleetyards and the newly revamped Balkinur Cosmodrome, where production continues to this day. Several small modifications have since been made to the refit specifications on the Steamrunner Class, including the addition of EMH technology in Sickbay and Ablative Armor to the nacelle and Deflector dish assembly.
Ships of Note:
USS Appalachia NCC 52136
USS Shenandoah NCC 52200
USS Quirinus NCC 83942
USS Artemis NCC 83093
USS Athena NCC 83099
posted on February 15th, 2009, 4:04 pm
Being a replacement for the Miranda and built before Wolf 359 would explain the low registries. Sure makes it sound like a decent heavy cruiser.
Armada-canon stuck it as an Artillery ship, I doubt the ship will ever escape from that.
Armada-canon stuck it as an Artillery ship, I doubt the ship will ever escape from that.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 4:52 pm
Memory Alpha >>> Ditl in terms of canonization.
However, I do like that article about the Steamrunner.
However, I do like that article about the Steamrunner.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 4:55 pm
Regardless of the source of the article, I stand by my statement.
The Steamrunner will never escape the Armada artillery issue.
The Steamrunner will never escape the Armada artillery issue.
Actium

posted on February 15th, 2009, 5:14 pm
sadly you are right tyler ... even though i hate it
posted on February 15th, 2009, 5:16 pm
Last edited by silent93 on February 15th, 2009, 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sure it can! We just have to throw a hoodie over it, and sneak it out the back door. Then we'll take it to a battered starships shelter, where it can start making a new life for itself!
On a more serious note, I think the real solution would be to say 'who cares what Armada 1/2 said the Steamrunner was', and just set it the way people like it. After all, if memory serves, Tricobalt Torpedoes are illegal anyway.
Edit to Add - I was right. Tricobalt Torpedoes are banned under the second Khitomer accords.
On a more serious note, I think the real solution would be to say 'who cares what Armada 1/2 said the Steamrunner was', and just set it the way people like it. After all, if memory serves, Tricobalt Torpedoes are illegal anyway.
Edit to Add - I was right. Tricobalt Torpedoes are banned under the second Khitomer accords.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 6:04 pm
Well, what are we going to use it for? Yet another Phaser and Torpedo armed Federation Cruiser?
posted on February 15th, 2009, 6:11 pm
Last edited by Dominus_Noctis on February 15th, 2009, 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Exactly Rhaz 
Also...
The Starfleet-manufactured tricobalt device could also technically be classed as a subspace weapon, as it is capable of creating a tear in subspace, as revealed in VOY: "The Voyager Conspiracy". However, due to the high predictability of its subspace effects they may not be classified as subspace weapons and therefore not banned by the Khitomer Accords. Though infrequently, they are sometimes carried on Federation starships. -Memory Alpha

Also...
The Starfleet-manufactured tricobalt device could also technically be classed as a subspace weapon, as it is capable of creating a tear in subspace, as revealed in VOY: "The Voyager Conspiracy". However, due to the high predictability of its subspace effects they may not be classified as subspace weapons and therefore not banned by the Khitomer Accords. Though infrequently, they are sometimes carried on Federation starships. -Memory Alpha
posted on February 15th, 2009, 6:36 pm
Last edited by Tyler on February 15th, 2009, 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Which brings up the question of giving to a Steamrunner when the only Starfleet ship shown using it was an Intrepid.
Those are standard, though if their use were to change I'm certain the team (and forum users) could think of an alternative.
Rhaz wrote:Well, what are we going to use it for? Yet another Phaser and Torpedo armed Federation Cruiser?
Those are standard, though if their use were to change I'm certain the team (and forum users) could think of an alternative.
posted on February 15th, 2009, 7:21 pm
Dominus_Noctis wrote:The Starfleet-manufactured tricobalt device could also technically be classed as a subspace weapon, as it is capable of creating a tear in subspace, as revealed in VOY: "The Voyager Conspiracy". However, due to the high predictability of its subspace effects they may not be classified as subspace weapons and therefore not banned by the Khitomer Accords. Though infrequently, they are sometimes carried on Federation starships. -Memory Alpha
To me this just seems like the people who wrote the article tried to find some kind of explanation for voyager carrying tricobalt devices... As far as I understand subspace weapons are banned because they can damage subspace. Allowing some because they are "predictable" would be like allowing predictable biological weapons when biological weapons in general are banned - it doesn't make any sense.
Also, as far as I remember, no tricobalt weapons were seen in the dominion war, although many attacks on starbases and planetary targets were shown...
posted on February 15th, 2009, 8:32 pm
Meng wrote:To me this just seems like the people who wrote the article tried to find some kind of explanation for voyager carrying tricobalt devices... As far as I understand subspace weapons are banned because they can damage subspace. Allowing some because they are "predictable" would be like allowing predictable biological weapons when biological weapons in general are banned - it doesn't make any sense.
Also, as far as I remember, no tricobalt weapons were seen in the dominion war, although many attacks on starbases and planetary targets were shown...
The absence (or at least lack of mentioning) of subspace weapons during the dominion war also raises questions.
As i understand the Son'a were either part of/allied to the dominion and from ST Insurrection we know the Son'a have subspace weapons in their arsenal.
Currently the Norway class is in FO while this is not a combat-focused design, yet the Steamrunner which is focused on combat is only available through a warp-in

posted on February 15th, 2009, 10:10 pm
Personally I'd take the Steamrunner in an escort role over that crappy arty style that it's in now.
Sure it would be another phaser torp ship but i suppose you could make it fast like the saber but only short range weapons and give it the salvo ability like the excellsior. Would make a great rading ship.
Sure it would be another phaser torp ship but i suppose you could make it fast like the saber but only short range weapons and give it the salvo ability like the excellsior. Would make a great rading ship.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests