Taq'roja Klingons vs. Assimilators

Share and discuss your gameplay strategies.
1, 2, 3, 4
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:26 pm
Last edited by Anonymous on March 10th, 2011, 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Boggz wrote: I love that you think I'm somehow angry :lol:.  Caps don't mean I'm angry.  Caps means I'm emphasizing something so there's NO POSSIBLE WAY YOUR EYEZ CAN MISS IT :woot:.


you sound angry, and very petty. caps arent needed for clarity, especially when u are repeating the same point again in caps, hoping that it will make it somehow stronger.

Boggz wrote:  Sarcasm is the only thing left.  You express opinions as fact and go nuts on anyone who disagrees.  


sarcasm is the weakest form of argument, it shows you have nothing to say. and i love how you think that i'm somehow going nuts (wanted to use your sentence structure from earlier :P ),  if u consider logic and reasoning going nuts, i suggest you stay 100 metres from your nearest courtroom.

Boggz wrote: I've seen you play only in a tiny number of replays


you havnt seen me in any replays :), i havnt been in any. when i find time to play i am in a different timezone from other replay makers, and i spend a lot of my fo time making replays.

Boggz wrote:I don't have confidence that you're a strong player.  I don't agree with much of your commentary "suggestions", so I don't have confidence in your ability to judge the balance of things, nor your strategy.  


you wanna make this a pissing contest on who is the stronger player? wow, thats low even for you boggz. obviously you have more online time than me, and are a stronger player. what is obviously false is that you think you know it all and know more about fo than me. you are extremely arrogant to believe that u can dismiss my points simply by saying you are the stronger player.

Boggz wrote: I figured I'd try and provide EVIDENCE  to show you things that might refute what you're saying.


you tried to provide evidence, which is something good, you provided poor quality evidence though, which isnt as good.

Boggz wrote:   Since none of that makes any difference and you just argue over wording and semantics


again, what you call semantics is vastly different from what i call semantics.

Boggz wrote:I'll just make those watching who might be afraid to speak their voices (lest you berate them with your "facts") know that there are those who disagree with you  :thumbsup:.


lol boggz, protector of the timid and terrified denizens of the forum from the evil logical arguments of myles. i find it extremely humourous how you are trying to position yourself as being constructive. nobody here needs you, i think they can cross the road without you holding their hand.

Boggz wrote:Ba-zing!


OUCH, no, not another corny phrase, my health bar is dropping, please, i beg of you, dont give me another "boom, roasted", i dont think my spine could take such force, where do u get these boggz? do you talk to people in real life like this?




EDIT:
Lt. Cmdr. Marian Hope wrote:Calm down a bit guys. Though I must say I'm not really getting the difference between "the veq won't help" and "the veq won't do the job", but that's just me and English is a foreign language to me. :innocent:


i apologise if i have been unclear, i can understand how somebody with english as a secondary language could be confused :blush: , i dont think for a native english speaker it is confusing though.

just to clarfiy to anyone who doesnt have native english:

i was talking about the special in all my posts, the special wont help, meaning that the assim is already really slow, and any klingon fleet will keep up with it with ease and murder it. the special slows down things, and is generally useful as ships can go repair or get to turrets, but against something so incredibly slow, and it has no yard, the veq special wont give you much more than the veq already does. good torps, which are in general good vs borg. but with the veq, its a specialist ship, needs its own extension, and field research for special, and is really weak. the veqs will do the job, but other things will do it better, and the veqs will be a liability if the borg make something other than assims. like scubes or probes.
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:33 pm
Hahaha!

  I am a better player than you :D.  Call it arrogant if you want, but don't you think that counts for SOMEthing when it comes to assessing the value of a ship?  :D

P.S.  Can't WAIT (Caps meant in anger :badgrin:) for your response :D
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:35 pm
Boggz, shut up already. I'm so sick of reading your logic mixed with all that silly talking. Just because you're one of the most experienced players in the community DOESNT MEAN YOU KNOW ANYTHING. Nobody cares if you're right, because you're sarcastic and that makes everything you say pointless and wrong. If Myles wants to correct other's opinions for being wrong, then YOU SHOULD NOT INTERFERE because he is right and being right is the only important thing on this forum. And the Veq thing...you're totally wrong there...its like saying "Pyramids are slow" and calling that the same as "Pyramids have a low speed", when they're CLEARLY two DIFFERENT things.
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:38 pm
Last edited by Anonymous on March 10th, 2011, 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Boggz wrote:Hahaha!

  I am a better player than you :D.  Call it arrogant if you want, but don't you think that counts for SOMEthing when it comes to assessing the value of a ship?  :D

P.S.  Can't WAIT (Caps meant in anger :badgrin:) for your response :D


it is arrogant, very arrogant, it does count for something, but not for everything. and if u truly believe that you know it all because you are more experienced, then you are delusional. i hope you arent like this in real life, such a large ego could easily strain interpersonal relations. i feel a little sorry for you, i recognise some of my own worst qualities in your posts.

Primigenia wrote:he is right and being right is the only important thing on this forum.


:lol: i like that phrase, i dont think being right is everything, a lot of the time i debate for the debate, not for making people say i was right. my most enjoyable debates have been with tyler, and they nearly always end in agree to disagree.
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:40 pm
I didn't say I know it ALL (<--- caps for emphasis, not anger).  I just think I know more than YOU (caps for humor :lol:).
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:43 pm
Boggz wrote:I didn't say I know it ALL (<--- caps for emphasis, not anger).  I just think I know more than YOU (caps for humor :lol:).


and you are wrong in that belief. im not gonna have a pissing contest with you, because its clear you value yourself on how good at fo you are. in which case you arent the best, anyway, there are better than you. just because you are better at fo than some people, doesnt make your points correct and there's incorrect automatically.
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:46 pm
Myles wrote:and you are wrong in that belief. im not gonna have a pissing contest with you, because its clear you value yourself on how good at fo you are


  You're absolutely right.  My self-worth is directly tied to how I perform in FO.  More than that - my self-worth is proportionally determined by how many arguments I win in the forums.

  Thanks god my ego is so big!  It will CRUSH YOU (<--- Caps for dramatic effect)!

  Btw, I'd love to do a commentary with you some time so I can point out in REAL TIME (<--- caps for emphasis) where your "what Myles would do" things are horrifically misguided.  Then you'd know how it feels to have someone constantly disagreeing with you :woot:
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:50 pm
Boggz wrote:  You're absolutely right.  My self-worth is directly tied to how I perform in FO.  More than that - my self-worth is proportionally determined by how many arguments I win in the forums.


i'd like to think that this is sarcasm, but im just not sure, that is how low my opinion has become of you.

Boggz wrote:Btw, I'd love to do a commentary with you some time so I can point out in REAL TIME (<--- caps for emphasis) where your "what Myles would do" things are horrifically misguided.  Then you'd know how it feels to have someone constantly disagreeing with you :woot:


:lol: keep dreaming, i've watched replays where you are a co-commentator, your ego fills up the game and your loud voice drowns everyone out. nobody gets a word in. ray once made a replay where you talked so much that he practically wasnt a commentator, i actually felt sympathy for him, cos u muscled him out of his own replay :( every time you interrupted him i shook my head.
posted on March 10th, 2011, 11:55 pm
Hahha YES!  (<--- caps for excitement :woot:).


  I think the one you're referring to is where Clint and I took over the replay.  If that's not correct, feel free to provide EVIDENCE (<--- caps to point out that you NEVER (<---- caps for emphasis) provide evidence) for ANYTHING (<--- caps for emphasis).  Ray said during and after that it was just fine.

  Clint and I are skilled, veteran players of this mod.  Rarely do we throw any kind of weight around, except when some smarmy guy decides that he needs to tell people things that are WRONG (<---- caps for emphasis) because he'd like to feel important.

   
  Dismiss it as ego.  That's fine.  I'll wager that, after that replay and this very visible disagreement, people will start using Veq's to break AA vs. Klingon matchups.
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:00 am
Boggz wrote:   I think the one you're referring to is where Clint and I took over the replay.  If that's not correct, feel free to provide EVIDENCE (<--- caps to point out that you NEVER (<---- caps for emphasis) provide evidence) for ANYTHING (<--- caps for emphasis).  Ray said during and after that it was just fine.


ray never said anything during that replay except for the intro, you kept cutting him off 2 words into each sentence. whether ray is ok with it or not isnt in question.

Boggz wrote:  Clint and I are skilled, veteran players of this mod.  Rarely do we throw any kind of weight around, except when some smarmy guy decides that he needs to tell people things that are WRONG (<---- caps for emphasis) because he'd like to feel important.


lol you dont know what my intentions are :P , and im not gonna engage in a pathetic personal attack battle with you. i think we are done here. g'day
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:05 am
ok guys i would like to point out that experience does count for alot, whether it come across as arragant or not  :whistling:.
would u take advice from a mechanic who had only played with toy cars lol i dont think so  :lol:
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:08 am
Facist wrote:ok guys i would like to point out that experience does count for alot, whether it come across as arragant or not  :whistling:.
would u take advice from a mechanic who had only played with toy cars lol i dont think so  :lol:


it certainly counts for something.

nobody is questioning that boggz is a good player, he is far better than me. but that doesnt mean he is correct and i am not. that has to be decided on the merits of our arguments, not on the strength of the arguer.

example, dominus is way better at fo than i am. but i point out a typo in the guide, and he corrects it. if we work under ths assumption that experience is all that matters, then the typo would remain until somebody with dominus' level of experience corrects it. rather extreme example, but it shows that sometimes pros make mistakes.
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:11 am
A typo does not equal an assertion that a ship isn't worth using in a situation.  :lol:  Way to mess that comparison up :D.

and im not gonna engage in a pathetic personal attack battle with you. i think we are done here


Aaaaand that's why you just sent me THIS personal message?

i checked out the who's online page, and you have been sitting in the taqqy vs assim thread, preumably pushing f5 until i post.


awww does the argument mean that much to you

im glad i have pissed you off so much Cheesy

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Nice ...
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:13 am
Boggz wrote:A typo does not equal an assertion that a ship isn't worth using in a situation.  :lol:  Way to mess that comparison up :D.


the comparison is extreme, but is ok.

Boggz wrote:Aaaaand that's why you just sent me THIS personal message?

Nice ...


personal messages are supposed to be personal, i think you are way out of line for posting it here.

also, i feel perfectly happy personally insulting you over pm :D
posted on March 11th, 2011, 12:19 am
Don't PM me with an intentionally aggravating message and then forum-post like a troll and expect me not to expose your ass :lol:  LOL
1, 2, 3, 4
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests