Jesus/vista

posted on March 15th, 2007, 4:07 pm

I am com if I was any more com I would be a sleep.

Yes it is to some one how is not well versed in the US political system.

....

...

O some people are Microsoft colt members and don't wont to buleve what they learn from comersuls is not real.

posted on March 15th, 2007, 5:31 pm

First off evolution is a theory and so is creationism I happen to be religious and I still think that evolution is the most likely expansion so fare for our existence but that does not mean that it is the way we came in to existence there is still no concrete evidence to prove evolution. also i live in the U.S. and i have never had any teacher try to shove evolution or creationism down my throat in fact is there was any bias it was toward evolution.

And for your information the first amendment to not say the separation of church and state it says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
This does not mean that religion cannot be in government it just means that government can not force religion on the people.

posted on March 15th, 2007, 9:11 pm

Evalution is a fact did you evin read the links I posted.... Thay have found bones and fosalised remainse of all of the staged up to human. It is 100% a fact at this pont. - It has never ben provin that santa is fake but the facts we have tell us uther wise. I could say santa is realy and thare is no way you could make a full proff agument that he not. Same gos for evalution evalution is a fact but if you wont to debate it thares no whay earther side can win.

Thats way ower consatution says "under god" and Press bush had a prare be for he was anograted presadent. and I could go one....
But when people repersenting the us say god not all of us bleave or wonted to be fumilerised with we see as a silly colt like organisation.

The goverment is suposted to repersent us and for tham to asom wee all like the word god is a cleer vilation that we have all come to exspet.

posted on March 15th, 2007, 11:34 pm

ewm, are you offended by the word 'god'?

posted on March 15th, 2007, 11:42 pm

No I am ofened by the stupied / sick things that have / are being caring out in the name of god. I dont hate religon I hate what religon terns some in to. It may suprise you that I go to cherch now and than and I participate in chearch fushons now and than.

- I do not bleev in god.
- I think orgised religon devides people.
- I think religon is raging out of controle and has ben for ages.
- I dont hate god.
- I dont hate those how do I feel sorry for tham.

posted on March 16th, 2007, 12:24 am

Evolution is a Theory!!!!!!!

The only fact in life is there is no such thing as a fact

ask any real scientist or teacher and they will tell you that Evolution is a theory a very good theory one with a lot of evidence to support it but is still a theory non the less.

[ewm90]

posted on March 16th, 2007, 12:42 am

Last edited by ewm90 on March 16th, 2007, 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

We have the the facks you can hold tham in your hand.......

If you wach the news that just fownd the missing link.

Side notes:

Zbigniew brzezinski says, if Iraq terns in to a regonal war be for we leave we will be stuck in Iraq for 20 years or more and would the end of americn as the world super power.

Battal ship wich is what you have in your sig SHO260 be came obsolete in WW2 aftter the air craft cairer came in to play. - The japanes Battleship Musashi, was sank by air craft caryors be for its guns evin came in to rage.

posted on March 16th, 2007, 1:31 am

While the carrier did become come the center of the navy after WW2 the battleship was still useful and in servis into the 90's in fact it shelled Iraqi positions in Kuwait in the first gulf war.

[ewm90]

posted on March 16th, 2007, 1:34 am

Last edited by ewm90 on March 16th, 2007, 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

They have their uses as support ships but they are not what you would call: U.S. Military Spending at its Finest

[Mortographer]

posted on March 16th, 2007, 2:01 am

Last edited by Mortographer on March 16th, 2007, 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

I'd like to point out that while darwin did not prove evolution, this essentially has. The truth of the matter though is that it is an inherant impossibility for anything to be proved absolutely, but as far as almost proving it, evolution is just as valid, if not more so, than many theories which are not disputed simply because they do not conflict with religeous doctrine. One day it might be proven that black is white and we'll all get killed at the next crosswalk.

[ewm90]

posted on March 16th, 2007, 2:22 am

Last edited by ewm90 on March 16th, 2007, 2:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

Of cores you cant prove that a man was on the moon but its a fact their was a man on the moon.

But why at this point their is no competing theory like we can from a space station called Atlantis. but at this point we relay have no reason to differ with the virtually proven.

posted on March 16th, 2007, 3:24 am

I was just being a **** about him typoing evolution.

I thought you'd all like my joke of posting the definition of evaluation.

Lol.

Macs suck that's fact.
Macs suck.
Macs suck.
Macs suck.

But ewm, horrible things have been carried out in the name of science and evolution too.

Nazi Germany, much?

The "Aryan Race" was an evolution.

posted on March 16th, 2007, 2:16 pm

I'd like to point out that while darwin did not prove evolution, this essentially has.  The truth of the matter though is that it is an inherant impossibility for anything to be proved absolutely, but as far as almost proving it, evolution is just as valid, if not more so, than many theories which are not disputed simply because they do not conflict with religeous doctrine.  One day it might be proven that black is white and we'll all get killed at the next crosswalk.

No it doesn't. It simply tells us that there is already existing genetic information in the genes of the moth which expresses different kinds of colors over the whole moth population. It shows us that species can adapt to environments and so have an advantage to other individuals of the population. Say the white moths are raped on the brown underground but the brown moths survive. That's what is called natural selection and in time just the brown individuals remain and give their genetic information to the next generation (gene pool).
BUT that doesn't mean that the "white" gene is gone. It is still there but because it's a non dominant gene it's hide somewhere on an DNA sequence. AND KNOW here comes the proof that this is NOT meant by evolution: No genetic information was added to the existing moth genes though environmental influence ( e.g. mutagenes).
So the moth does not proof that out of a plain cell a higher organized organism was born. But that doesn't mean that it is impossible that right this could happen (the addition of genes to the old stock). Now this is the proof that the theory is still a theory because it was not yet shown that there was a happening like that which made sens, means which gave an individual a positive boost in fitness like a new color ( say red which hold others from eating it)

.... why do I believe that you all have absolutely no clue what you are talking about? You all adapt opinions from others and stick it to you own few of sight and out comes just a painful blabla?! First get your heads into the media before telling people how it is. There is no proof anywhere there are just parts of the whole thing which COULD be true. And every real scientist is not sharing the opinions of the most of which is posted here. Because it's not true. (sry)

[Smoerebroed]

posted on March 16th, 2007, 3:10 pm

Last edited by Smoerebroed on March 16th, 2007, 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

'cause we all are not so educated as you are, Jan of BORG. We are just simple potato farmers.

Oh btw: someone was asking for a high space creation theory:: go and ask Tom Cruise, or the dark haired lass from JAG or Isaac Hayes. They will surely explain EVERYTHING to you.

Oh btw: Darwin also made some mistakes, in his theory; I think especially regarding women and the concept of monogamy. So happy flaming i wish to you all

posted on March 18th, 2007, 9:22 pm

I'd like to point out that while darwin did not prove evolution, this essentially has. The truth of the matter though is that it is an inherant impossibility for anything to be proved absolutely, but as far as almost proving it, evolution is just as valid, if not more so, than many theories which are not disputed simply because they do not conflict with religeous doctrine. One day it might be proven that black is white and we'll all get killed at the next crosswalk.

Sorry Mort, but you fail to make the distinction between microevolution (which is proven) and macroevolution (which is not). You see, the ability for a moth to adapt is different from a single-cell lifeform sprouting legs. After all, even after the moth adapts, it's still a moth.