Jesus/vista

posted on March 12th, 2007, 4:54 pm

[=!=]RedShirt &nsbp; &nsbp; 
Posted: Mar 12 2007, 04:51 PM

QUOTE
Well alot of those Christ people are very offensive to me. Thay bash evary thing from gay people to evalution. Its ok to have a opion but when you fores it on uthers than its becomes dictatorial! I do not like it when uther tell me what to think.
- I have ben more than pashent with the jesus jerks but my pashents has liments.


So you bash them right back...

Just brilliant, ewm. Way to show your 'moral superiority'.

Oh, and the meaning of "Christian" is literally one who follows Christ. When did Christ EVER try to 'force his opinion' on others? Therefore, I submit to you that a true Christian would NOT force his opinion on you, and that your basis for complaint againt those who ARE Christians is unjust and unsubstantiated.

QUOTE

Well macs are buch beater than PCs os I gess that makes PCs junk. lol


*sigh*

Macs are crap for gaming, therefor they PCs are better than Macs no matter how 'junky' they are.

QUOTE
Thay all so have the abilaty to run bug free.
on mac you can!


No bugs, but no games either.

This post has been edited by [=!=]RedShirt on Mar 12 2007, 04:52 PM

Well I have tried pasents and as I posted be for human pashents has limits.
'moral superiority'... superior to any one.

Oh, and the meaning of "Christian" is literally one who follows Christ. When did Christ EVER try to 'force his opinion' on others? Therefore, I submit to you that a true Christian would NOT force his opinion on you, and that your basis for complaint againt those who ARE Christians is unjust and unsubstantiated.

and all so in power/controle. other Christian grups don't fite back nearly enough ... Funny you should say that. I was just reading this: http://www.ipodnn.com/articles/07/03/08/flash.mac.future/

posted on March 12th, 2007, 11:03 pm

Macs suck.

http://www.godhatesfags.com.

That's christians taking it a little far.

BUT THEY DON'T SHOVE THEIR BELIEFS DOWN YOUR THROAT!.

posted on March 13th, 2007, 6:07 pm

not now days, though it was (as many religions have been) used as an excused to go to war... the cruisades (sp).

i personly don't believe in a religion. i have nothing against those that do so long as they don't force their beleifes on me

posted on March 13th, 2007, 6:13 pm

Same here, I'm not religious.

But ewm see's a divide between him insulting jesus.

And me insulting his godless liberal ***.

posted on March 13th, 2007, 6:49 pm

Look, ewm, if you say they are bad, the worst way to get your point across is to make yourself look even worse.

[ewm90]

posted on March 14th, 2007, 4:45 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on March 14th, 2007, 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Macs suck.

http://www.godhatesfags.com.

That's christians taking it a little far.

BUT THEY DON'T SHOVE THEIR BELIEFS DOWN YOUR THROAT!.

Macs run wile PCs crash.

Thanks for proving my point.

Not nerly far enuff.

We have a presadent how is forsing scools to tech crashonisom as a altrnitive to evalution. and is forsing schools remove sintifacly provin facts becuss thay clash with religose bleefs. - If thats not craming it down ones throt I dont know what it!!!!

----------------

I dont care what you think of me. I do care what people thing. I am just saying what most thing but are to cowed to say. - Its time people stand up and remove religon from pollatics. Thare must be a spration between cherch and state!

posted on March 14th, 2007, 8:08 pm

altrnitive

As an alternative.

I'm Canadian. First off. Lol.

But, AS AN ALTERNATIVE!

AS A CHOICE!

FORCING IT AS A CHOICE IS NOT FORCING IT AT ALL!

LOLS PWNED.

posted on March 14th, 2007, 8:55 pm

But if one is a fact and the uther is basted on fath teching the same makes people think that are both fact and techers are not alowed to give thare opions.

posted on March 14th, 2007, 11:00 pm

But still, you try to TWIST things into your own view.

I, am not religious and I beleive in Evolution.

But if they teach both of them as fact and as even.

THEN THAT GIVES CHILDREN THE CHANCE TO MAKE THE CHOICE FOR THEMSELVES!

posted on March 15th, 2007, 3:04 am

Well by not telling tham that creationisms is just a theory and unprovin is twisting things. Plus a teachers job is to tech its her/his job to offer opions and different ways of vowing logic.

...

But one is a fact this other is a unproven religious bleef. and should be tot as so.

But if you don't give them the facts and different ponts of vuwe they cant make a fare desition. Religion is a faith not a sincens so is should not be tot in school, school should teach of it not about it.

[Rhaz]

posted on March 15th, 2007, 3:11 am

Last edited by Rhaz on March 15th, 2007, 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Evolution is also unproven.

Also MACS SUCK!

And the world agrees.

[ewm90]

posted on March 15th, 2007, 4:25 am

Last edited by ewm90 on March 15th, 2007, 4:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

I think not. where do you live in a cave?
Evaluation was proven by Charles Darwin:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/...40113075946.htm

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/3b700...ecbccdrcrd.html

About Darwin - Charles Robert Darwin was born on 12 February,1809 fifth of six children of Robert Waring Darwin and Susannah,daughter of Josiah Wedgwood. ... born in Briton.
------------------------

http://www.public.coe.edu/departments/Biol...darwin_bio.html

http://www.darwinday.org/
_______________________

Macs are better than PCs I dont evin know what that would make PCs if a computer that is vastly better sucks.

World agrees with me =-D

posted on March 15th, 2007, 4:53 am

Evaluation was proven by Charles Darwin?

 &nsbp; &nsbp;Evaluation has several distinguishing characteristics relating to focus, methodology, and function. Evaluation (1) assesses the effectiveness of an ongoing program in achieving its objectives, (2) relies on the standards of project design to distinguish a program's effects from those of other forces, and (3) aims at program improvement through a modification of current operations.

I've NEVER HEARD OF THIS THEORY BEFORE!?
PLEASE HELP ME OUT.

The theory of Evaluation?

WELL I EVALUATE THINE THEORY AND LABLE IT BLASPHEMY!

Wow I'm a ****.

posted on March 15th, 2007, 5:07 am

Yes 200y ago

(1) their are no objectives...... Some one needs to hit the books.
(2) What project desines is he/she toking about?
(3) NO! evaluation is a bunch of mutations that help life adapt. Thar are no aims/gaols its all basted on chance.

Go to school they will tech you allot of things.

The only theory left to Evaluation is in what way did it happen. We are 200y past the pont of asking did it happin.

BLASPHEMY! - Thank god the church is not running things any more.....

Yes you WON!!! ------------------------------------------------- a free trip to school!

posted on March 15th, 2007, 1:17 pm

Children.... calm down plz.

1. This thread is very confusing

2. "I'm not religious and believe in Evolution" makes a very funny sens to me

3. Charles Darwin brought up a hypothesis (Origin of Species) which was then ranked up on the level of a THEORY that brought it to the Theory of Evolution which remained until today. A theory is defined as a sum of scientificly established statements which are not yet refused nor ranked up to the level of an ultimate law...also known as a "nature law" like the law of gravity.
That means that evolution could be a fact but don't has to be. That's the reason why scientists permanently changer their opinion because a new thing arose on the dark horizon of uncertainty and change older statements...but HEY thats the way it goes in science. Just facts they found can be stored as a part of the whole thing. Through that the ones who say that evolution is a fact I have to say that you are trapped into the big paradigma which is as false as the creationist's opinion who remain strictly on their attitude.
And here lies the dangerous core. Belief and science is incompatible when it comes to an argue because it's a completely different thing. Science is a material when belief is a spiritual thing.
BUT that doesn't mean that evolution and belief is incompatible or science is working against religions or religions against science. The sad thing is...they just do so (but they musn't) and that's why I'm sick of the whole story. For me it's also important that state (including school) is separated from religion to guarantee that there is no twist between groups which could hide the things that really count.
You know what...I am Christian but I don't let myself influence from people who shout out what they think it's the ultimate truth. I search for myself and for me I find things in nature that shows me that there is someone. But I don't take the right to say how this one made it because I don't know. I just recognize.
Searching for truth is never false because there is just one truth like time is defined and we have to die and we will know what is true earlier or later.



what was that mac thing?