Hilarious Bush Quotes

[ewm90]

posted on February 7th, 2005, 10:40 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on February 7th, 2005, 10:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

- PREATOR DEFIANT
i think you shood read this: http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/k2/stn/arc...opic145966.shtm

and maby 180,000 wher kiled in the anishal expotion but thowsin and thowinds died after wherds.

knowing what we know to day about the bomb i whood never have droped it. at that time we did not know haw pawer full it was. it shaoked the pepal how made it and all of world to learned what had hapind.

we all most dproed it on a 3ed torget to thank god with did not.

posted on February 7th, 2005, 11:27 pm

Well you are indeed a moron, had we not dropped them millions more of innocent civilians would have died...then a million million service men...

[Anonymous]

posted on February 7th, 2005, 11:29 pm

Last edited by Anonymous on February 7th, 2005, 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Let's not get into a heated arguement okay? Remember what this topic was created for...

EDIT:

The past is the past and arguing about won't help change it at all.

posted on February 7th, 2005, 11:34 pm

But I mean jesus...everyone says many millions of lives were saved by the bombs and hes still rambling about the destruction they caused, not prevented.

posted on February 7th, 2005, 11:41 pm

You know the old expression:

"Too good to be true..."

Well, thats the way war is, sure, many people were free and some disaster averted but, of course, it came at a price. Many deaths.

But PREATOR DEFIANT has a point. Without those bombs launched what would of been the intial future? More death caused by a continous war?

posted on February 7th, 2005, 11:43 pm

Chances are yes, there was a 95% chance of more war because of the japanese klingon-ness when it comes to honor. Once they saw that they would die meaningless deaths and not even kill their enemy, they decided to give up.

posted on February 8th, 2005, 12:23 am

Technically Praetor the Emperor was convinced to order his people to cease hostilities when he saw what we did to Nagasaki. The first bomb didn't even impress them too much, they thought it was a one-shot or an act of God or something. We were indeed fortunate that Nagasaki's destruction ended the war, because of course we were all out of bombs : )

Careful about saying they weren't nukes by the way, they were fission devices, commonly called nukes, but they weren't THERMOnukes, which is what you're trying to say I think.

Also, ewm, we killed 300,000 mostly innocent civilians in March 1945 in Tokyo with firebombs. Tell me how the two nukes were so inhumane?

posted on February 8th, 2005, 12:37 am

We killed like 200,000 people in dresden during a firebombing, more then what were killed in the first day of the hiroshima and nagasaki bombings combined.

Nuclear weapons are essentially all the same expect the device you used to detonate it, and how much radioactive material is used, I don't see why saying a nuke is just a differant kind of a nuke is so important...

And the 2 atom bombs did their job of ending the war, thats undesputible.

posted on February 8th, 2005, 1:03 am

There where 2 more unsued bombs created at the time, besides Fat man and Little Boy, now will eveyone just drop it and get back to the topic.


I want justice. There's an old poster out west, as I recall, that said, "Wanted: Dead or Alive.", Thats one fo my favourite bush quotes.

posted on February 8th, 2005, 3:14 am

There where 2 more unsued bombs created at the time, besides Fat man and Little Boy, now will eveyone just drop it and get back to the topic.

Fair enough about returning to topic. But we really were out ... another plutonium implosion device like Fat Man went operational some 4 months after cessation of hostilities, around the New Year I believe.

[ewm90]

posted on February 8th, 2005, 3:37 am

Last edited by ewm90 on February 8th, 2005, 4:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

- PREATOR DEFIANT
all i am gona say is i think you rong but i respect your opinon.

- cts006 - coolhandab - USS Legacy
you are all rite we need to get back on topic.




did you here the haribal news bush is naw finaly feeling the heet from the defacit and his inrspoabulty with the us trashary.
and is naw cuting soshal programs and uther inporton funnding programs.

i dont remiber tham all but what i do remiber is:

he cuting the fundying for amtrak wich with out funding will go brackrupt and leev us with out a pasiger tranes sitom in amrica.

hes naw calasling hubal telisope wich is still finding this and is a huge resore and will be a grate lose to the sintifac comnity.

hes cuting funndying for litarsy programes well if your pore and have dislexsa i gess your scroowed.

and anuber of uther programs this is unexspetibal to me. hes all so useing the munny to increes awer miltary.

when will amrica whake up and stand up for its fucher?

posted on February 8th, 2005, 4:42 am

I'm starting to think Kerry would run the contry better. Bush is from Texas and is use to roughing it, but no one else is. Why can't he just take other peoples feelings into concideration?

posted on February 8th, 2005, 4:48 am

Because if every president did what the population wanted and not what was actually right, then we would all be speaking german or russian.

[Anonymous]

posted on February 8th, 2005, 4:49 am

Last edited by Anonymous on February 8th, 2005, 4:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Like I said, Kerry might run the contry better, but not perfectly.

Strange that I'm even disscusing this. I'm Canadian.

posted on February 8th, 2005, 4:55 am

Yes quite strange, you either cut spending on pretty much everything, or you raise taxes a whole bunch to fix the deficit, bush chose to cut spending. I think Kerry would have done the other but again, we still lose, and I think more so. Whoever is in the white house is not going to do things everyone likes, so for now we will just have to live with this system of government.