Hilarious Bush Quotes

Want to say something off topic? Something that has nothing to do with Trek? Post it here.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 14
NieKnight
User avatar
posted on February 5th, 2005, 8:18 pm
ok i don't know much about these issues however the bottom one move the animals fossil fules are running out we need as much as we can get our grubby little hands on :P
posted on February 5th, 2005, 8:43 pm
but the oil in the anamal refuges will only last a cupal of years. when thare are uter places we cood get oil from. its sad that pepal wont to do this.

bush is all so making new nookler wepinds desipe the band the usa crated to reduss nookler wepinds. dont you think we have a nuff i meen realy thares onaly so meny times you can blow up the warld.
NieKnight
User avatar
posted on February 5th, 2005, 8:52 pm
and you have the documents to prove this emw90? have you managed to get hard evidence that bush is making womd? if so the whole world must converge on the us of a and invade, the whole world is waiting on your responce do you have 100% hard evidence that the usa is making womd's?
posted on February 5th, 2005, 9:23 pm
Last edited by ewm90 on February 5th, 2005, 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
yep heres a britesh paper tocking about tham.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,898550,00.html

and at this pont thare all redy under devlement i have seen pichers on tham on the us news.



AND ITS EWM90 NOT EMW90!!! lol
posted on February 6th, 2005, 4:37 am
what is nookler wepinds . where ya from ewm90 .
posted on February 6th, 2005, 6:09 am
washington dc i have dislexsea i am realy bad speller.
posted on February 6th, 2005, 6:53 am
I was reading that article and it appears that we are the ones with WMDs. How ironic, isn't it. Bush is following the classical example of a slimeball who points blame on others for his own crimes or misdeeds. What a pitty. :shifty:
posted on February 6th, 2005, 6:56 am
Nice little retarded thought there donald, had we not had our thousands of nukes then the Russians would have been all over us. If we don't have them now then the other 13 or so nuclear capable countries could threaten us, like russia did.
NieKnight
User avatar
posted on February 6th, 2005, 2:31 pm
eWm90 wow a news paper has acess to top secert goverment meetings that must have some real good links, you must never trust the press they will always hype things up they proberly heard that gwb is planing on building a nuclear power plant and just conviently heard nuclear "hes making bombs he making bobs he said the n word!" the press will always throws the smallest of rumors out of control like the bbc did and still does, do you honestly think the guardian news paper would have heard about this befor the united nation or nato or the terroists did? come on really.
posted on February 6th, 2005, 3:34 pm
-NieKnight
i can aser you this one is real usa i can say for sher is bilding bucker busting nookler wepinds and posabul uther tipes two.


-PREATOR DEFIANT
the cold war is over but we are still bilding nukes. despite a trety we made to reduse nukler wepinds. rasha is realy mad over this one as well thay shood be.
bush has just ben puling out of treetys left and rite what kind of mesage duss that sint to ower alise?
posted on February 6th, 2005, 7:08 pm
We still need them to keep the peace ewm...As I said before without them other countries could walk all over us. And of course it's not like were going to use them like saddam would have, I think your getting the point now.
posted on February 6th, 2005, 8:47 pm
if you reed the "the pentagons new map" by thomas barnett

it out lines the pentagons new thing for the fucher and in it, it says that thay are not woryed about eny of the big moder contreys germanys, franes, briton, indea, sweedin, spane, and so on from going to war eny more do to roles made affter WW2.

thare idea for the fucher is fiting littal contrays and makeing tham dimocrays like iran, sera, africin contrys, and alot of saweth amrican contrys.

so why do we need new nukes???
posted on February 6th, 2005, 9:20 pm
Last edited by Anonymous on February 6th, 2005, 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
but the oil in the anamal refuges will only last a cupal of years. when thare are uter places we cood get oil from. its sad that pepal wont to do this.

bush is all so making new nookler wepinds desipe the band the usa crated to reduss nookler wepinds. dont you think we have a nuff i meen realy thares onaly so meny times you can blow up the warld.

Theoricly, the WHOLE world has enough nucluer power (The USA formost) to destroy the world 10 times with the weapons currently avaible.

I'll make a note that I'm Canadian and I don't know how much Bush effects you guys in the States but I feel for you. In the debates, man, he is a retard.
posted on February 6th, 2005, 9:30 pm
-USS Legacy
only 10 times triy more like 1000 times. us alown has a nuff to blow up the wald like 500 times.

lol most pepal in my contry are to woryed about offineding some you say some thing like bush is a retard most pepal realy what to know the person here well be for we say that amrica is so devided.
posted on February 6th, 2005, 9:33 pm
Last edited by Anonymous on February 6th, 2005, 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-USS Legacy
only 10 times triy more like 1000 times. us alown has a nuff to blow up the wald like 500 times.

lol most pepal in my contry are to woryed about offineding some you say some thing like bush is a retard most pepal realy what to know the person here well be for we say that amrica is so devided.

The only problem we have up here in Canada is a big spending Prime Minister. (Sponsership Scandel)

So much for world harmony...
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 14
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron