Columbia vs Chavez

posted on March 7th, 2008, 4:01 am

So, where do you all stand in regards to the gathering storm in South America?

posted on March 7th, 2008, 4:29 am

no where. We're not privy to the internal machinations that are taking place. All we see is a superficial reportage as presented by the media - with each channel portraying the story a little differently based on the foreign policy of its country in regards to the situation at hand.
The fact that you have to post "Columbia vs CHAVEZ" instead of Venezuela says more than enough.

posted on March 7th, 2008, 4:45 am

Okay, perhaps the Columbian Government vs Chavez would be a more accurate title.  However, it's also to unwieldy to display properly, and thus I shortened it. 

You assume that a bias lies behind the title I chose, but you failed to consider more practical concerns.

posted on March 7th, 2008, 6:18 am

well, personally, I think that this whole thing is staged by the communists [hereby going to be referred to as Pinko's or Reds], and is an effort to undermine the American people's belief in the effectiveness and competence of the government.  plus, the Reds also want us to believe that the US would be going into S. America next so as to weaken our already shaky support of the Iraq War, so as to further their commie agenda as to reinvade the middle east while we are busy in S. America.  Chavez is actually a cardboard cutout that is animatronic by Pinko scientists (ha) and they have been planing this for years as to get the vast right forests to get a good monopoly on oxygen production before we can turn over to safer fuels and those Godless Pinko's will sell us back our oxygen at quadruple the price of normal oxygen to drive the economy into the ground the cake is a lie the cake is a lie the cake is a lie the cake is a lie



and that is where I stand.

posted on March 7th, 2008, 8:02 am

I swear you copied that from the original AP report!

posted on March 7th, 2008, 2:49 pm

Well colaba and the usa are f*%k budys so if chives triyed eny thing it whould be "Iraq 2 the conquest of Venezuela" terning the few undisded non columben soath amarican/central american people off.

I shere holp chives has a noth brains in his head to relise the usa will not stand buy wile one of ower few alice left fran nafta/cafta get mad at us.

So, where do you all stand in regards to the gathering storm in South America?

Current RFO Status: WAR!
WAR Battle record: No Combat has Occured. (the bigest joke of the day we are at war with out a war.) O bob

posted on March 7th, 2008, 3:21 pm

whats going on in south america? im clueless XD

[Anonymous]

posted on March 7th, 2008, 3:31 pm

Last edited by Anonymous on March 7th, 2008, 3:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Lumpy, your post explains your contributions to the Hoedown. More need not be said.
Btw, whatever you're saying about the Pinkos, isn't that already being done by the other Reds - namely the Republicans?! lol

posted on March 7th, 2008, 9:48 pm

Current RFO Status: WAR!
WAR Battle record: No Combat has Occured. (the bigest joke of the day we are at war with out a war.) O bob

thanks for the reminder ewm, i forgot to update that

posted on March 7th, 2008, 10:02 pm

Well colaba and the usa are f*%k budys so if chives triyed eny thing it whould be "Iraq 2 the conquest of Venezuela" terning the few undisded non columben soath amarican/central american people off.

I shere holp chives has a noth brains in his head to relise the usa will not stand buy wile one of ower few alice left fran nafta/cafta get mad at us.

Well, babelfish couldn't translate the parts of this comment that seem to be in a foreign language, but I think I get the essence of what you're saying.

Chavez seems to fancy himself some sort of modern Che Guevara/politician crossbreed.  He flaunts his diplomatic stances, while at the same time backing rebels within the country he supposedly was helping establish "peace".  He's perhaps even less trustworthy than our own government.

posted on March 7th, 2008, 11:42 pm

Chavez seems to fancy himself some sort of modern Che Guevara/politician crossbreed.  He flaunts his diplomatic stances, while at the same time backing rebels within the country he supposedly was helping establish "peace".  He's perhaps even less trustworthy than our own government.

Um doesn't that pretty much sum up US foreign policy too. 

posted on March 8th, 2008, 8:24 am

Hey, at least they didn't fund the Taliban who turned around and attacked them back =/.

posted on March 9th, 2008, 7:05 pm

Well, so far as we know none of the rebel groups he funds have betrayed him.  Of course, all that means is that he has better taste in rebel groups than we do.

posted on March 9th, 2008, 8:05 pm

And your takes on US screw ups mean what in regards to Chavez?
Amazing why people feel compelled to bitch about something or the other when the person they, for reasons known not even to them, detest come out on top.

posted on March 12th, 2008, 6:13 am

If I really wanted to whine, I'd complain about your illegible formating. 

Anyway, I fail to see a clear point brought forth in the previous statement.  If you could clarify, that would be appreciated.

There, whine-free enough?