Klingons and Rommies...... Plus something else...

posted on October 6th, 2009, 12:48 am

Although I admit an early game sphere is a guilty pleasure as well.

HAH! That's because you become your opponent's nightmare

Alas, when I use the randominator, I get Klingons most times. It can only be Kahless' will

posted on October 6th, 2009, 6:01 am

I stopped using the Random setting when I got Feds for a third time in a row. Grrr.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 9:36 am

1. If the Feds are better at research, it makes sense they have more research stations to build and techs to research than the Klingons. My point exactly.

Needing more stations for the same amount of Research is inefficient and not cheap.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:36 pm

The "not cheap" is the point of having more research stations for the Feds.

They already research all special weapons on the shipyards.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:37 pm

So instead, you want to increase the cost by making them build more stations to drain resources faster?

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:42 pm

So instead, you want to increase the cost by making them build more stations to drain resources faster?

Federation = Economical Stations wise
Dominion = Spammers early game
Romulans = Fully loaded Research labs
Klingons = Weapon Obsessed
Borg = Adapting

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:47 pm

I know what they should be like, but making the Feds build more stations isn't correcting them. That's just making them 'Quantity over Quality' for research.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:51 pm

I think this is where things should be... canon wise....
//Race                   Quantity/Quality Ratio
Federation              2:1
Klingons                 5:3
Dominion                3:7
Romulans               3:2
Borg                       9[sup]999999999[/sup]/2 

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:52 pm

Check my previous posts.

I'm advocating for seriously nerfing the Feds, making them spend more cash in facilities AND confusing them by giving them the freaking amount of ships they all want.

ALL Feds models should be included, specially if it means adding another shipyard or two. Mwahahah.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 1:55 pm

I'm not following....... you are contradicting your self...

Because you want to make them slightly weaker but have a truck load of ships? The more variety you have the more powerful you are because of having such a large variety.

CHECK YOUR QUOTES!

posted on October 6th, 2009, 2:13 pm

No contradiction.

Having like 3-4 different constructors, one hybrid miner/constructor, several science ships, one "healing" medical ship, besides the two existing repair ships and a few downpowered combat ships will confuse the hell out of any serious player.

And go play Romulan/Klingon/Dominion/Borg.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 2:46 pm

Are you serious about buggering the Federation for nothing?

posted on October 6th, 2009, 5:45 pm

..., it's the 2 ship limit. The Dreadnought has a 2 ship limit just like the Tavara, that should be cut too. ...

BLASPHEMER

i hate you AND captain proton with all my will.  >:(

how dare yous suggest that we 86 the only thing those two factions have going for them.  why not just permenatly disable the federation engines while your at it.  have a pile of ships outside the shipyard just sitting there.  it would make the same ammount of sense.

posted on October 6th, 2009, 6:01 pm

You're not very good at reading, are you...

I didn't actually say I think it should be reduced, that would make the Dreadnought even more useless than it currently is. What I said was 'If we're going to do X, we might as well do Y.'

posted on October 6th, 2009, 6:43 pm

Baleful... please calm down. The Tavara may yet still have strength... just maybe a rise of inflation on its price. Don't worry though, if the Tavara would be reduced at all it wouldn't be Nerfed. Plus also there'd be some other power to make up for it. I personally wouldn't mind if it had a torpedo removed if the other Warbirds got their needed boost.