Bortas too strong?

You feel like a battlecruiser is too weak or a race too strong? Go ahead and discuss it here :)

Question: What is your opinion on the Bortas Ion Storm?

Total votes: 50
Bortas is OP and doesnt deserve to be in the game!1 votes (2%)
Bortas can be a little OP at times10 votes (20%)
I like Bortas, I allways win with them!4 votes (8%)
I think its just fine the way it is32 votes (64%)
this topic is by Funnystuff so I dont care3 votes (6%)
1, 2, 3, 4
posted on May 29th, 2010, 4:45 pm
Me too. This whole thread was stared because for about 5 games, in a row, my team managed to make a huge, and I mean huge, comeback in each game (we were losing terribly  :crybaby:) just because of the Bortas. Konsumat got really frustrated, and so I made this thread.
posted on May 30th, 2010, 12:09 am
Well, as I recall it was because of the BortaS mixed with the Qaw'Duj :D
posted on May 30th, 2010, 12:00 pm
bortas with qawduj now is way op, mainly because the qawduj polaron field is bugged, if you thought it stopped escape before, imagine how annoying it is now, with a 100% chance to knock out 5 ships engines lol (plus their other systems)
posted on June 3rd, 2010, 10:40 pm
Hehe so what you're saying is that superior micro is OP!  :lol:

Anyway, was the Qua Duj OP back then?
posted on June 3rd, 2010, 10:42 pm
funny the polaron field special in 3.1.2 is bugged, that was my point.

instead of disabling ONE random subsystem each second for 5 seconds it disalbes ALL subsystems for 5 seconds on 5 ships.

the guide quite clearly lists it as cheating

in previous patches using the polaron field (which worked as intended) to keep ships in ion storm was not cheating and was superior micro and good.
posted on June 3rd, 2010, 10:46 pm
myleswolfers wrote:in previous patches using the polaron field (which worked as intended) to keep ships in ion storm was not cheating and was superior micro and good.


EH, I always decided against using it since it was one of those infinite effect abilities... which were always really insanely evil  :(
posted on June 3rd, 2010, 10:47 pm
Yeah, I know, I just wasn't sure if it has been that way since 3.1.1 or if that was just a new error in 3.1.2
posted on June 3rd, 2010, 10:48 pm
New - it's in the Etiquette section of the guide too, as all nasty bugs always are :)
1, 2, 3, 4
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests