Who is the best Star Trek Villain (or bad guy)?

What's your favourite episode? How is romulan ale brewed? - Star Trek in general :-)

Question: Who is the best Star Trek Bad guy?

Total votes: 56
Kahn (ST III)19 votes (34%)
General Chang (ST IV)4 votes (7%)
Borg Queen (VOY)3 votes (5%)
Borg Queen (First Contact)2 votes (4%)
Nero (ST XI)2 votes (4%)
Shinzon (Nemesis)0 votes (0%)
Sona (Insurrection)0 votes (0%)
Dukat (DS9)21 votes (38%)
Mirror Kira (DS9)0 votes (0%)
Other (Specify Episonde and series)4 votes (7%)
Bad Guys? Star Trek had bad guys?1 votes (2%)
1, 2, 3
posted on May 11th, 2010, 12:44 pm
nero and shinzon were crap, always lets go blow up earth.

and rofl was just a rubbish villain. 2D like shinzon and nero.

i liked dukat and garak because of their complexity, you never knew them completely. both were sometimes good sometimes bad and rarely showed their full hand. character writing on ds9 was good for the villains.
posted on May 11th, 2010, 12:45 pm
General Chang all the way.  He sat down at dinner with his buddies and enemies and basically, poetically, told Kirk to F... off!  Now Kirk didn't take too kindly to that, even in his senior years....so that's what made it a great movie!

Cordrazine......lol, the wonder drug to cure all Star-Trek born infections!  I bet cordrazine is how they got rid of cancer and super aids!
posted on May 11th, 2010, 12:56 pm
cordrazine is a chemical drug that is used to reset the heart, but as you saw with mccoy, it can turn you insane if you are already alive :woot:.
posted on May 12th, 2010, 4:58 pm
myleswolfers wrote:nero and shinzon were crap, always lets go blow up earth.

and rofl was just a rubbish villain. 2D like shinzon and nero.

i liked dukat and garak because of their complexity, you never knew them completely. both were sometimes good sometimes bad and rarely showed their full hand. character writing on ds9 was good for the villains.
qft. dont like the stereotypes.
posted on May 12th, 2010, 5:32 pm
Sterotypes are required. If they were removed entirely, then the well written ones would quickly become the new sterotypes themselves and you'd be back to square 1.

Can't have the good without the bad, after all.
1, 2, 3
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron