Politics

Want to say something off topic? Something that has nothing to do with Trek? Post it here.

Question: republican or democrat or uther

Total votes: 25
republican4 votes (16%)
democrat9 votes (36%)
green2 votes (8%)
independent3 votes (12%)
usher2 votes (8%)
dont care5 votes (20%)
1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
posted on November 4th, 2004, 9:19 pm
In reply to Baron, of course we upgrade everything, the Iraqis had their tanks upgraded too with more armor and maybe night vision I heard. Not a match for a depleted uranium shell but just an example. Show me these hospitals that we never hear are bombed, has anyone else ever heard anything about these? Is he the only one?

In reply to Azmodan, let me ask you something, would you want Saddam right accross from your border and you know he has chemical and nuclear weapons? Would you like that knowing he has attempted to take other countries before? You can't possibly believe that the US, or some of the other 12 or 13 nuclear weapons wielding countries, are as likely to use theirs as Iraq. And again the Oil thing comes up, look back a few posts and you get your answer.

Ewm, lol, i'll admit that Bush should not have won in 2000, he did win this one fair and square so that should not be an issue. Why not use past examples from modern history? They help shape the present into something understandable.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 2:16 am
Well, all I can say about all this is-Bush kicks @$$, he was right about going into Iraq, and he's right about every other decision he's made.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 4:30 am
he was right about going into Iraq, and he's right about every other decision he's made.

WHAT THE DEVIL DO YOU MEAN!!!!!! IRAQ HAD NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!
posted on November 5th, 2004, 4:44 am
Last edited by ewm90 on November 5th, 2004, 5:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
bush calmes irack still have WMD and still cant find tham. i think its kinda funny he still thinks thares a chages of finding tham. if i was him i whood forget about WMD and figer out haw to deel with a moreand more dedly contry evry day.

PREATOR DEFIANT: bush won this fare. basted off feer and tarer. and distotions. the whay this contrey is going worys me.

i rely hope he has and idea on what to do with:

1. iran posabul bilding nuckler wepinds.
2. the araft diying and haw to controle a the plisanens neer isral. and will homos grab pawer win he diys?
3. north kroea have posabuly 6 nooks naw
4. the bad relashons with the rest of the world
5. the evry festring devide in america. that he sed whood not hapin in the 200 elcshon
6. arock spiraling tord sival wore
7. the huge 3,000,000,000,000 det in amrica.
8. to ashaly work on the conflick with the west bank that is at the root of all hatride tord the usa in asia minor.

thos are the bige ishowes rite naw
posted on November 5th, 2004, 4:57 am
im kinda glad bush got reelected. us changung presidents in the middle of a war would have been the perfect opprotunity for them(terrorists) to strike
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:00 am
thay taristed dont starike theam offin. not tomichon thay dont have much left of a traist organishation to atack with.

so it whood not have made that much difrants.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:05 am
if we changed presidents in the middle of a war, we would become weak. the terrorists would pick up on it. exploit it. and then we would loose another building/buildings that we value so highly.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:13 am
i am sary that is so not trowe that is bush propagnda tring to get you not to vote for kary.

feer feer feer feer feer feer feer feer feer feer feer feer !!!!

the only thing to feer is feer its self.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:16 am
i heard that from cairo1
[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP
User avatar
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:20 am
it dosnt realy matter who the prez is, if i wanted to blow up my naborhood, i would regardless of who was sariff at the time couse i know i would get away. lol The only danger with changing prez is that it would give more OPERTUNITY and PAIN of a strike, couse the new prez would be moving aournd a lot. i know i know, terroists are not out to take power blada blada. but to strike at the prez of amiraca after newly elected? ooo big prize. in reality the govermant and armory would stay at the same bourder power for maby a year while the govermant figers out were to put there men. lol so we are week no matter what.....run in fear panisys!!


ps....im not apart nor condone and tarriortist activits, just respect there skill.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:22 am
Last edited by ewm90 on November 5th, 2004, 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
well if you wher rely wored about that look at the facts:

1. fact the press wint to wore with out preparing.
2. fact pepal dont like us over thare be cuss thay dont think we have thare intrest at hart.
3. we dont have a nuff equipment solgers have to armer thare own vihicals with crap metal. and no botty armer avilabul. some troops are useing walky tocking from cvs to tolk tech uther.
4. the cuntrys sowly faling aport.

dont you think the press how got us in to this has a clowe haw to get us out? i think we are less safe naw than if we had chged to a press with milatary expreince.
posted on November 5th, 2004, 5:37 am
We HAVE the equipment, its just that we are missing the brains in the presidency
[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP
User avatar
posted on November 5th, 2004, 6:31 am
OK POEPLE...
Lumpy, and to the folks that say things like, we dont have the brians in the presidency. did you ever stop to think that maby ITS NOT THE FLIPPING PREZ BUT WHAT THE FLIPPING MEDIA SAYS? have we all forgotten what Kerry said, he said HE would have gone into irak too....WIAT...he would go too! would have anything better?! more equipment some how?! no! the that foolish media is out to bet the prezz. Also...maby you ahve forgoten that the prez dosnt go out to Irak and look at all his men...no ANY prez now stays on the home land...and DEPENDS on his men out there to tell him info. now as for the stuff the men need....IF YOU WNAT THEM TO HAVE THEM....STOP LOWERING THE TAXES!!! GEZZ. the less money the army getts the more unprotected we are, we should realy be mad at not the prez but them Celluar componys that buy 10,000.00 dollor cars two show off, those 10,000.00 dollors could be arrmor...and before any one says that hey rase taxes on them compnonys then.....the goverment cant jsut do that....you would have people SCREAMING discriminatoin, human rights violatoins, constitutoin vilatoins! its the people that have to change!
Ewn90, and to the people that say your stuff, one, ANY military is prepared for comabt...we did take over irak right? lol i mean shoot we won. two, who cares if they dont like us, the are dependt on us and we them, if they shoot at us they crash the econimy for a lot of people. and we do have half our hart looking out for them, in time they will lern. three...look above. fore...can it in any way be the prezs falt that the people cant get around who is demoscant or repucant? who is lidtitsian or conpersiove? come on its US the USA poeple that have to change! how?! working on that....lol

PS vote Matthew for Prez 2024!
posted on November 5th, 2004, 7:51 am
I quote bush,"Just a reminder, at NASA, space exploration is our primary goal."

no ****ing duuuuuuhhhh
posted on November 5th, 2004, 10:16 am
And little Defiant makes sense, Ewms still WAY off so I wont answer any of that jibberish (the word jibberish symbolises replys that have already been answered in my book) and lumpybob is actually borderline spamming, but carpathia made more sense. Ewm I have this to say, nothing you say is EVER shown on the news, it's pure pre-election democratic propaganda. Where are you getting all these so called facts? I mean talking to you is like talking to a Muslim bent on their beliefs.
1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests