Politics
Want to say something off topic? Something that has nothing to do with Trek? Post it here.
posted on November 1st, 2004, 3:49 am
Last edited by ewm90 on November 1st, 2004, 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
deleeted - i wonted to see if i cood get java scrip in a post.
posted on November 1st, 2004, 3:50 am
what is all that computer code for/about?
posted on November 1st, 2004, 7:55 am
Yeah...Uh ewm, pretty much everything you say is wrong for some reason or another. A democrat caused 9/11...a democrat. How can you stand beside them?
posted on November 1st, 2004, 1:33 pm
Last edited by ewm90 on November 1st, 2004, 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
haw can you say than. a dimacrat cosded 911 bin ladin is not a dimacrate.
that is realy rong.. next you will call karry a tarist hu.
that is realy rong.. next you will call karry a tarist hu.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 12:51 am
Christ, do you remember anything I say? I told you a few pages back why. Clinton, 1993, Somalia...
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 2:10 am
Last edited by ewm90 on November 2nd, 2004, 2:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
yes i do i have a back butin.
but man you need some prespective.
thae same aligation about clintan i can use for bush to and thay work beeter for bush. when bush be cam press.
1. be for 911 he did not meet with his nashanl suracty adviser about tarisam one time or reed or lisan to eny thinh he had to say abou tarisam.
2. he did not tolk about with the cia or fbi or eny one els.
clinten did miny times. over just one yere.
so dont give me the bull it was clintens folt that uperd. thats crasy tolk. or i can say repulican proaganda.
but man you need some prespective.
thae same aligation about clintan i can use for bush to and thay work beeter for bush. when bush be cam press.
1. be for 911 he did not meet with his nashanl suracty adviser about tarisam one time or reed or lisan to eny thinh he had to say abou tarisam.
2. he did not tolk about with the cia or fbi or eny one els.
clinten did miny times. over just one yere.
so dont give me the bull it was clintens folt that uperd. thats crasy tolk. or i can say repulican proaganda.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 2:13 am
ferther more it was in the PDB(presadnts daly breef) he fald to reed. about a tret of planes crashin in to bilding flown by tarists.
if you vote for bush tomore you deseve him.
if you vote for bush tomore you deseve him.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:18 am
Arguing about politics on the internet is stupid. Around half the US hates Bush, and the other half appreciates what he stands for and has accomplished for our country. The Democrats could run a paralytic chimp and it would still receive half the popular vote. If you guys want to talk about the UN, or our personal freedoms like the First and Second Amendments to the Constitution, and what the two parties would like to do to them, fine.
But don't say ridiculous things like how Kerry will fix everything in Iraq by forcing the French to play nice and do something useful for the first time in their pathetic history, and give every man woman and child a free ice cream cone, and "free" healthcare for everyone, and all the other nonsense. Thinking people do not tolerate such crass propaganda.
But don't say ridiculous things like how Kerry will fix everything in Iraq by forcing the French to play nice and do something useful for the first time in their pathetic history, and give every man woman and child a free ice cream cone, and "free" healthcare for everyone, and all the other nonsense. Thinking people do not tolerate such crass propaganda.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:25 am
1. dont bash the frinch.
2. i whood love to tolk about the un and ower freedams going by the wast side. but we still have not gotin past the bush propagnda.
3. Arguing about politics on the internet. but if i dont bush mite win and i whood be cofterbul with that seeing what he has not dun for this cuntry.
2. i whood love to tolk about the un and ower freedams going by the wast side. but we still have not gotin past the bush propagnda.
3. Arguing about politics on the internet. but if i dont bush mite win and i whood be cofterbul with that seeing what he has not dun for this cuntry.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:28 am
I'd like to toss in my two cents about Praetor's comment that a democrat caused 9/11. Islamic nutcases that want to enslave the world for the pleasure of Allah caused 9/11. That said, Clinton was too busy bombing women and children in Serbia to accept the Sudan's offer of Bin Laden's head on a plate in the mid 90's, and we have Clinton's inept State Department to thank for the insane North Koreans having possession of a handful of nuclear weapons.
The biggest Republican foreign policy failing of that magnitude in recent history was George H. W. Bush's failure to kill or capture Saddam the first time around in 1991. That error has been rectified.
The biggest Republican foreign policy failing of that magnitude in recent history was George H. W. Bush's failure to kill or capture Saddam the first time around in 1991. That error has been rectified.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:35 am
Dude it's open season on the French. They have blocked us at every turn. They wish to see us defeated to bring "balance" to the world. They continue to arm the enemies of the Free World. French rockets and French demolitions have been murdering both US troops and innocent Iraqis every week, along with the usual communist Chinese and former communist Russian arms.
The French actively protect and feed information to the Serbian war criminals like Karadzic whenever a NATO/Russian strike force goes after him. The French tried to conceal a massive arms cache in Afghanistan that was just uncovered by some Canadian troops and was being used to kill Afghanis at the polls.
French synagogues and Jewish cemeteries are continually defaced with vile Nazi symbols. That hasn't even happened in Germany lately, much to the German people's credit. Man, the Vichy French couldn't put the Jews on trains fast enough in 1941 and '42.
France refused to participate in NATO and European security until 1994, when the Soviet threat was long, long past. The French have never cared about anyone but the French, and likely never will.
Now tell me again why I shouldn't "bash" the French?
The French actively protect and feed information to the Serbian war criminals like Karadzic whenever a NATO/Russian strike force goes after him. The French tried to conceal a massive arms cache in Afghanistan that was just uncovered by some Canadian troops and was being used to kill Afghanis at the polls.
French synagogues and Jewish cemeteries are continually defaced with vile Nazi symbols. That hasn't even happened in Germany lately, much to the German people's credit. Man, the Vichy French couldn't put the Jews on trains fast enough in 1941 and '42.
France refused to participate in NATO and European security until 1994, when the Soviet threat was long, long past. The French have never cared about anyone but the French, and likely never will.
Now tell me again why I shouldn't "bash" the French?
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:45 am
Last edited by ewm90 on November 2nd, 2004, 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
i dont tink you have you facts rite ether youer much closer than PREATOR DEFIANT
but still alot of probloms with what you sed:
the trists dont wont to enslave the world thay wont to make it muslom, kill for persanl resons, or get in pawer.
and diring clintan n-korea had no nooks and thay wher being woched by the usa. bush be came press and out sorted that to china with is evry thing elss we make cheeply. and wil bush was the press he has not 1 not 2 not 3 not 4 maby 5 maby 6 nooks.
but still alot of probloms with what you sed:
the trists dont wont to enslave the world thay wont to make it muslom, kill for persanl resons, or get in pawer.
and diring clintan n-korea had no nooks and thay wher being woched by the usa. bush be came press and out sorted that to china with is evry thing elss we make cheeply. and wil bush was the press he has not 1 not 2 not 3 not 4 maby 5 maby 6 nooks.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 3:46 am
i have a s-korean working under me by the whay.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 4:11 am
the frinch are a prawed pepal. some times anoing and think heded
but thare aliyes. i dont like what the frinch are doing but thats the frinch. and as for freedam fiys thats just dumn.
but thare aliyes. i dont like what the frinch are doing but thats the frinch. and as for freedam fiys thats just dumn.
posted on November 2nd, 2004, 5:40 am
I think your both wrong.
1. I hate the french, not to be a racist but it's sad when the phrase 'shaking like a french soldier' comes into the vocabulary. They are basically the anti-american european country at the moment, and have been for some time. Frankly we should take it over with another blitzkrieg, and split the spoils with Britian, Germany, Belgium, and Spain.
2. And how the hell could Bush be responsible for 9/11? I mean you expect too much from 1 person ewm. Had Clinton not moved Delta force, the 75th and the 160th out of Somalia then things might be alot differant. Chances are sep 11th wouldn't have happened but i'm sure we would have been attacked in some lesser fashion like the cole. Keep in mind cool that this is before Serbia got hot.
Thats about all I see wrong, coolhand seems to have a better perspective then ewms extreme left handed views.
Oh and coolhand, if you don't want us to debate on the internet then go somewhere else. Don't tell us not to and join in, thats called a hipicrit
1. I hate the french, not to be a racist but it's sad when the phrase 'shaking like a french soldier' comes into the vocabulary. They are basically the anti-american european country at the moment, and have been for some time. Frankly we should take it over with another blitzkrieg, and split the spoils with Britian, Germany, Belgium, and Spain.
2. And how the hell could Bush be responsible for 9/11? I mean you expect too much from 1 person ewm. Had Clinton not moved Delta force, the 75th and the 160th out of Somalia then things might be alot differant. Chances are sep 11th wouldn't have happened but i'm sure we would have been attacked in some lesser fashion like the cole. Keep in mind cool that this is before Serbia got hot.
Thats about all I see wrong, coolhand seems to have a better perspective then ewms extreme left handed views.
Oh and coolhand, if you don't want us to debate on the internet then go somewhere else. Don't tell us not to and join in, thats called a hipicrit

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests