Please explain

[ewm90]

posted on May 28th, 2007, 11:23 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on May 28th, 2007, 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

How dose this work? Its ether this or its a ship thats so heavy is woulds crack in half and scrape the osion flore.

How dose Jesus avoid being a snack? Or some thing on the bottom of a dinosaur's foot?

I don't know how to make this not sound like a joke but its a real question.

The reason I made this thread is becose I just herd that Kentucky is going to have a mussem that covers Nowas ark. They all so said their was dinosaur on the ark.

Attachments

posted on May 28th, 2007, 11:52 pm

lol
he had god on his side what more can any man ask for?

posted on May 29th, 2007, 7:44 am

lol
he had god on his side what more can any man ask for?

Exactly.
And where do you find a word about dinosaurs in the Bible?
However, the museum must be a very big building then anyway.

posted on May 29th, 2007, 9:46 pm

Well Christianity is a very curative type of religion for intents the word abortion or gay was not in the bible ether but they seem to be a main forces of some Christian religions.

lol
he had god on his side what more can any man ask for?

Exactly.
And where do you find a word about dinosaurs in the Bible?
However, the museum must be a very big building then anyway.

posted on May 30th, 2007, 7:25 pm

"thou shall not lay with a man as thy lay with a woman"

what was that about being gay not being in the bible?

posted on May 30th, 2007, 7:29 pm

Well it said nothing of sex. Pulse allot of the quotes from the bible or in code. I would need to know what context that was said in.

posted on May 30th, 2007, 7:35 pm

thou shall not LAY
wtf ewm?

posted on May 30th, 2007, 7:39 pm

As I said the Bible is in code and can be spoon to support any vowe pont.

The Karon that very very similar to the bible can be used to justify tarisom but thats only if you chose to look at it in that lite.

[ewm90]

posted on May 30th, 2007, 7:44 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on May 30th, 2007, 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

further more:

In fact, the Bible accepts sexual practices that we condemn and condemns sexual practices that we accept. Lots of them! Here are a few examples.



    *  DEUTERONOMY 22:13-21
      If it is discovered that a bride is not a virgin, the Bible demands that she be executed by stoning immediately.
    * DEUTERONOMY 22:22
      If a married person has sex with someone else's husband or wife, the Bible commands that both adulterers be stoned to death.
  * MARK 10:1-12
      Divorce is strictly forbidden in both Testaments, as is remarriage of anyone who has been divorced.
    * LEVITICUS 18:19
      The Bible forbids a married couple from having sexual intercourse during a woman's period. If they disobey, both shall be executed.
    * MARK 12:18-27
      If a man dies childless, his widow is ordered by biblical law to have intercourse with each of his brothers in turn until she bears her deceased husband a male heir.
    * DEUTERONOMY 25:11-12
      If a man gets into a fight with another man and his wife seeks to rescue her husband by grabbing the enemy's genitals, her hand shall be cut off and no pity shall be shown her.

[Fullphaser]

posted on May 30th, 2007, 8:30 pm

Last edited by Fullphaser on May 30th, 2007, 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Its really to bad, maybe they can bicker with biologist, who pretty much have them down as loons, but then attacking geography and archeology on the same note. Add that to paleontology I didn't know that many fields of science could be completely wrong.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v215/ ... 562454.jpg

posted on May 30th, 2007, 9:32 pm

Your chart had the opposite affect on me than what you where trying to convey becos religion according to that chart  every thing so easy wile scientific research vets out the errors and will tell you when they think they have a mistake.

If you cant say you are wrong you should not be creating your own facts. I am wrong allot but their is NO evidents to say that evaluation is wrong. There is NO evidents to say that being gay is wrong. Thar No evidents that abortion is wrong infect their is evidents that says that is the human thing to do - Crating a life in a horrible situation is not right at all.

posted on May 31st, 2007, 5:12 am

If you cant say you are wrong you should not be creating your own facts. I am wrong allot but their is NO evidents to say that evaluation is wrong. There is NO evidents to say that being gay is wrong. Thar No evidents that abortion is wrong infect their is evidents that says that is the human thing to do - Crating a life in a horrible situation is not right at all.

Abortion and homosexuality are no variables which can be somehow determined as 1s or 0s, so as right or wrong. The question is, if it is right for you or not and if it is right for your society or not. And if the majority decides that abortion is equal to murder it will be persecuted like murder.
If the majority decides that abortion is absolutely fine no one will ever care about it when it is done.
Evidence doesn't matter at all. Evidence can't matter at all if you are discussing morals because it is simply not possible.
Evidence in this context belongs to science and neither homosexuality nor abortion are scientific discoveries.

posted on May 31st, 2007, 5:44 am

Your chart had the opposite affect on me than what you where trying to convey becos religion according to that chart  every thing so easy wile scientific research vets out the errors and will tell you when they think they have a mistake.

If you cant say you are wrong you should not be creating your own facts. I am wrong allot but their is NO evidents to say that evaluation is wrong. There is NO evidents to say that being gay is wrong. Thar No evidents that abortion is wrong infect their is evidents that says that is the human thing to do - Crating a life in a horrible situation is not right at all.

err... the chart is a joke in reference to the ideology that religion prohibits change while science endorses it. Hence why several million people are ready to base their lives off the words of 5 men

posted on May 31st, 2007, 3:30 pm

I beg to differ look at the results basted on the past we can have a good idea of what thing will will probably be if they are used in the wrong way today.

Well for our society it is the right thing to do, When we looked at Gay and abortion as bad things where changed because they where not working for our society so to change them back would be not wise at all.

Well if the majority did changer their mind I would move. But for now the majority is for pro chose but the minority is getting their way. Some thing is very wrong here.

Spoking like a true evangelical.

No they aren't BUT the revolts of past and present destions on the subject are by looking at the past you can see the future.

Fullphaser____________________________

I agree but if its not talked about information will not be shared in both directions.

If you cant say you are wrong you should not be creating your own facts. I am wrong allot but their is NO evidents to say that evaluation is wrong. There is NO evidents to say that being gay is wrong. Thar No evidents that abortion is wrong infect their is evidents that says that is the human thing to do - Crating a life in a horrible situation is not right at all.

Abortion and homosexuality are no variables which can be somehow determined as 1s or 0s, so as right or wrong. The question is, if it is right for you or not and if it is right for your society or not. And if the majority decides that abortion is equal to murder it will be persecuted like murder.
If the majority decides that abortion is absolutely fine no one will ever care about it when it is done.
Evidence doesn't matter at all. Evidence can't matter at all if you are discussing morals because it is simply not possible.
Evidence in this context belongs to science and neither homosexuality nor abortion are scientific discoveries.

posted on May 31st, 2007, 7:10 pm

so ewm is saying that cheating on your husband is RIGHT!
lo l