New Orlean Reconstruction

[Anonymous]

posted on January 13th, 2006, 2:37 am

Last edited by Anonymous on January 13th, 2006, 2:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

And what does Valerie Plame have to do with Al-Qaeda?

Also, one of the reasons that it was only on Fox could be because CNN ans NBC has an overwhelmingly negative and pessimistic view on Iraq fueled by politics. It is in part because of this that the third rerun of the O'Reily Factor at 4:00 am beats out the usual 8:00 pm NBC news program 50% of the time!!!

[ewm90]

posted on January 13th, 2006, 3:14 am

Last edited by ewm90 on January 13th, 2006, 3:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

well incolwed the UK gardeon, BBC, washington post, new york times, ABC, CBS and the rest of the news meda thay all say the same thing.

FOX news is slanted unfare bisted and sperds disinformation.

have you ever knotested on FOX new thay have repulicans intervowed thay look well groomed and seem to know that thay are tolking about than thay have a demacrat no one respects how is dresed porely and gives uncleer meseges.

i live how bill O'Reily all ways shuts off the mic of pepal he duss not agree with make the aguments he has one sided.

[Anonymous]

posted on January 14th, 2006, 1:55 am

Last edited by Anonymous on January 14th, 2006, 1:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

If Fox is so evil, than why are the other ones doing so poorly?

Oh, and if it seems that I didn't take your comment seriously, thats because I didn't

[ewm90]

posted on January 14th, 2006, 2:01 am

Last edited by ewm90 on January 14th, 2006, 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.

what uther ones doing porly?

well you dont have to take eny thing serisly if you dont wont to. i am just that saying i tolk you so is geting so old to be papl how dont take me serisly.

all of the perfeshanl news meda make fun of how one sided and propagnda drivin fox is. thare the one ony ones how get sugechons from thare corpite hed all most daily on how to report the news. FACT!

Foxs it a feel good station thay tell pepal how bleve in what thay like what thay wont to hear with out the truth if its negitve.

posted on January 14th, 2006, 2:27 am

The other news channels are in trouble, and they know it. They are taking every opertunity to criticize Fox, and all they have succeded in doing is making themselves look like idiots. In fact, Ted Turner himself criticized Fox for devoting time to "frivolous" topics like missing children!!!

posted on January 14th, 2006, 2:49 am

i dont see the uther news companys intrubal infact meny do better than fox.

news is not a copration i dont tern on the news to feel good if thats why you tern on the news you shoud look at swim shoot modals you will get just about as meny facts.

posted on January 14th, 2006, 2:53 am

...abiet slanted on a liberal perspective.

[ewm90]

posted on January 14th, 2006, 3:37 am

Last edited by ewm90 on January 14th, 2006, 3:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

eny thing that disagress with the conservive perpective i am gessing will be called the liberal perspective.

conservative or libarl it is the truth it has ben povin over and over agin by polls, traind perfeshanls, reserch, and tests.

evin if it is a liberal perspective wich its not duss that automatic make it wrong??

posted on January 14th, 2006, 8:57 am

well go watch BBC 24 or SKy news then. man. it is very paranoidal just to suspect all news channels are bad. it is just a way some channels do their report. i find cnn just crap because they like to dramatise every accident with picking the worst off victims and showing worse case scenario's

it is just what you want.

our dutch news shows are seen not reliable aswell as it is too liberal in the views of other countries.

it just depends what kind of news you want and how it is presentated.

posted on January 14th, 2006, 9:34 pm

evin if it is a liberal perspective wich its not duss that automatic make it wrong??

It depends if they let their political views get in the way of honesty (*cough* NEW YORK TIMES *cough cough*). Its fine if they express their political views in the editorial section, as long as they STAY THERE. That goes for ALL newspapers and news networks.

posted on January 14th, 2006, 11:29 pm

well if you wont honesty, abit of advise dont lison to polations.

the 1# job of a polation is to be relected that sed you have to pic the poatiction that you think can solve the probloms that you learn about on the news.

the new well repot sensational stories not be cuss thay hate bush but be cuss sensationalism sells.

you will see more sensationalism on FOX than on eny uther net work or new out fite in the mane streem theys days.

if you remiber the clinton years Cnn new york time and all uther news out fits had bill clintons sexal scaned on the frunt page agin its not be cuss thay hated bill clinton it be cuss sensationalism sells.

posted on January 14th, 2006, 11:47 pm

That still doesn't come close to justifying how the New York Times milked the Abu-Gharib prison scandal. Last time I had checked, they had done something like 80 front page stories on it. Now THAT is inexcusable!

posted on January 14th, 2006, 11:48 pm

agin its sensationalism and sensationalism sells. it was shoking and haribal and whood make sher pepal paiyed for the paper to read it.

posted on January 15th, 2006, 2:00 am

There's nothing "sensational" about repeating the same story over 80 times!

posted on January 15th, 2006, 3:13 am

when it is a good story you will melk it al long at you can. thay did the same to clinton. wile clinton was in power i thot the cnn was more conservitve. its not about polatics its about munny.