New Orlean Reconstruction

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 4:07 pm

Casper
well Iraq was a huge gambal i dont know if we can pull it off. i think we bit off more than we can chowe by invading iraq. when you in vade a nuther contry and you dont have the harts and minds BEFORE invading it made the chase of geting tham aftter much harder.

so i think it was a mistake we did not do a nuff preperation be for invading as bush says you need do both have a diplimatic and milatry aproch to an invation wich we have not all ways dun in past fases of tring to tern iraq.


[TD]Roach
this is a polital thread what duss you comint have to do with eny thing i am realy confsed....

flaming hows flaming?

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 4:31 pm

even in politics they don't talk about one topic over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. that is called digging dead corpses out of a grave.

or shall we start a topic about why a terrorists where able to take down the WTC? that is still an open discussion.

come one i am sure there is more recent US politics to talk about like Arnold that fell of his bike or i donno what. but i guess that isn't so big news because it doesn't effect the whole world. because i already stated many times you ewm ignore all other politics but the US

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 4:36 pm

well if you dont like dont look at it!!!!

WTC? whats that i never herd that abeviation be for?

thare is so much to tolk about i cant cover evry thing if you wish to start a nuther topic you are welcom to.

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 4:40 pm

i did try to talk about, the benzene leakage in china, north korea or the gas war with russia and other stuff, but all swept away by you.

and WTC = WORLD TRADE CENTER

[ewm90]

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 4:55 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on January 23rd, 2006, 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

i dont know a nuff about the gass lick neer rusha to realy offer a opinon uther than is a haribal sichation. what are you refering to the cimcal plant thats psoing runtion watters or the crassy man how left gass canisters in japan wich made pepal sick.

thare wher meny probloms that led to 911 meny of wich have not ben fixed to day. i think the tarist attack on 911 has ben debated oer and over by me on uther threads and the mead i dont think thare are meny ney ponts of vowe left. but i am opined to debate it if uther wont to.

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 6:46 pm

The thing with the Ukranians Siphoning off their gases?
Or a different issue?

And either way, invading Iraq was likely a good thing.
We eliminated alot of equipment including:
T - 55, 72 and 80B Tanks.
Mig -27, 29 and 31 Fighters.
Su - 24 and 27 Fighter-Bombers.
An untold amount of AK - 47/74's and RPG - 7/NV's.
Explosives, and ORGANIZED terrorist personnel.

Who would have simply fled to any other country the U.S. was in the process of invading and increases the casualties that we face. Just like other islamic rebels are running to Iraq now, to take up their dark crusade against the coalition forces. And the united state, with less organized cold-war russian equipment to face in the future, could lower its expenditures on armed forces. Although now we have an Iran to look for, and a China. But who knows if that is in our lifetime.

posted on January 23rd, 2006, 8:40 pm

non of wich was a risk to the usa or isreal or to eny uther contry. haveing an amry is ok you need some thing to defind your contrry.

posted on January 24th, 2006, 5:27 am

None of which was a threat to israel?

DO YOU KNOW THE PURPOSE OF THE SCUD?
ITS RANGE WAS EXTENDED SPECIFICALLY FOR ISRAEL.

[ewm90]

posted on January 24th, 2006, 1:48 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on January 24th, 2006, 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

and if iraq had used tham isreal whood have wiped out iraqs army. not to michon the us respose. sodom has dun some dumb thing but he is not dumb a nuff to stab a tiger with a swis army nife.

posted on January 24th, 2006, 2:36 pm

aren't dictators stupid anyway?:wacko: that is why they are dictators.


:fish:
:2guns: :wheelchair:
:guns:
:tank:

posted on January 24th, 2006, 3:08 pm

ashaly most dictaters are crasy eval genasise that how thay stay in power and why thay are so hard to deel with.

[[TD]Roach]

posted on January 24th, 2006, 3:13 pm

Last edited by [TD]Roach on January 24th, 2006, 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

better kill all the cray people in all those clinical wards. they might take over the world

[Anonymous]

posted on January 24th, 2006, 3:18 pm

Last edited by Anonymous on March 20th, 2007, 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

My, god, when you take a break for a day, look what happens...

Casper
well Iraq was a huge gambal i dont know if we can pull it off. i think we bit off more than we can chowe by invading iraq. when you in vade a nuther contry and you dont have the harts and minds BEFORE invading it made the chase of geting tham aftter much harder.

*edit*
Yeah, well now the situation is to shaky to comment on, but to be fair we were doing good at the time of the comment... and Iraq is still no ****ing Vietnam!!

non of wich was a risk to the usa or isreal or to eny uther contry. haveing an amry is ok you need some thing to defind your contrry.

Au contraire, ewm. You forget that the reach of Saddam's money was alot farther than his missles. Apparently, you also forget that Saddam funded several of the terrorist groups currently plauging Isreal.

aren't dictators stupid anyway? that is why they are dictators.

Not at all. If they were stupid, they couldn't have made it to the top in the first place. The problem lies in the fact that most dictators have egos the size of Jupiter, and than some.

ewm, I will reply to your big one when I have the time. I don't at the moment.

[ewm90]

posted on January 24th, 2006, 3:40 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on January 24th, 2006, 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

RedShirt,Jan 24 2006, 04:18 PM] My, god, when you take a break for a day, look what happens...



Bullshit.

ewm, let me get this through your head:  IRAQ IS NOT VIETNAM.  WE ARE NOT LOSING, AND WE ARE NOT IN DANGER OF LOSING.



Au contraire, ewm.  You forget that the reach of Saddam's money was alot farther than his missles.  Apparently, you also forget that Saddam funded several of the terrorist groups currently plauging Isreal.



Not at all.  If they were stupid, they couldn't have made it to the top in the first place.  The problem lies in the fact that most dictators have egos the size of Jupiter, and than some.

ewm, I will reply to your big one when I have the time.  I don't at the moment.

well i am just glas you did not anser the list of things we are doing be for. that list was geting longer and longer i was geting tireder and tiereder lol.


well i realy hope your right i realy do, but from do not see realy evidents that i cant trust at this pont to that afect.


know i knowhe gave munny to hamass and to the family of suided bomers how whint after isreas. but thares a difrans of funding the enamy of your enamy and atacting your enamy.


i wish you would ent i am geting tiered and confused of ansering big list i think it works beter to just post 2 or 3 conserns in a post in sted of 26

[Casper]

posted on January 25th, 2006, 6:31 am

Last edited by Casper on January 25th, 2006, 6:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

non of wich was a risk to the usa or isreal or to eny uther contry. haveing an amry is ok you need some thing to defind your contrry.

ewm, do you remember that footage of iraqi scud rockets impacting israel during the first golf war? how is that not a threat to the israelies?


Do you remember WWII ewm? Hitler made packs and treaties constantly, and he constantly broke them. and he nearly destroyed europe. Saddam was following that same pattern, and going further in the open. We wouldn’t have let hitler get away with half of the crap we let saddam get away with.

how can you say the iraqi army wasn't a threat to any other country or nation