GUNS!

posted on January 25th, 2006, 3:38 am

if pepal asome pepal are out to hert you if will make it hard to trust uther pepal.

Thats life. I have very few people that I trust completely, mostly because of past experiences with people who bring shame to the human race.

You are better off not trusting that many people. That makes you less likely to fall in tough times.

[ewm90]

posted on January 25th, 2006, 3:46 am

Last edited by ewm90 on January 25th, 2006, 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

well if i did not trust eny one i whould not be ware i am to day.

i lisined to a intervowe of the fander and CEO of fedex kinkos he sed the best way to run a busness is to balins a checkbook well hired trander prefeshanls to set brod bandreys and to TRUST you inpliy.

if you can do you you will not be abule to run a succesfule bissnes or govern uther pepal if you can trust tham.

trust is not only inbissnes if you can opin your self up to relation ships with Trust you will never have a good relation ship with a woman.

Trust is the fandation of every thing with out it you be come a very lonly person.

of cores thare need to be limets you use comin sens.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 1:10 pm

Wow! I missed alot over the past few days

ewm90: Just because there are police somewhere does not mean that they will be in the spot you need them, when you need them. Depening on where you live (in my area) it may take up to 5 minutes before the police get to your house when you make a call. This is more than enough time for someone to kill your entire family and ransack your house.

Here is something that no one has asked yet:

If a burglar was going to hurt or kill a member of your family (wife, child, mother, father, etc); would you do anything to stp them? If you had a gun would you take them out first? To discuss this as a simple mugging or something is one thing, but when it comes down to protecting the ones you love, that is an entirely different story all together.

I hope you would be willing to take a preventative action to save someone you love. Otherwise it is questionable that, do you really love them?

about this have you ever heard of that farmer who defended his land and shot a repeat burglear when he was in his house, he got life due to the justice system favouring the teenage burglar, caused national outcry.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 3:13 pm

i dont know wich farmer you are refring too. do you have a link to info about this case.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 3:31 pm

ewm, don't start it with the links. In my experience, whenever the "link" excuse is pulled, things get very, very ugly.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 4:36 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/717511.stm

a lot of people sympathiesed with tony martin and many of us britons would do the same thing in his situation.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 5:05 pm

well it is against the law to kill a burglar who is unarmed.


but because of good media cries like what you did ewm in this forum you get those situations

posted on January 25th, 2006, 6:39 pm

[TD]Roach pepal are resposube for thare own behaver if thay are not mucher a nuff to hold a debate thay should not be posting here.

i am not going to soger cote thing to triy to make tham more exsepibal. i will avode some tuchy sume subjects and will not perpusly man a nuther menber mad in the debate threads.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

about the link

more the reson to limet or do away with gun use of the gonral public.

if guns where not involved in the sichatin probly no one whoud have ben kiled.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 10:29 pm

no he would have just stabbed him or beaten him with a cricket bat.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 11:12 pm

to kill some one with a nife or cow bar rerires a leval of hate that is guy mite have had at lest it whood have givin the kid a chase to run you can out run a old guy with a cow bar or knife you can not out run a bulit.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 11:32 pm

I don't think your point about hate is vallide in the sperof the moment with adrenalen and fear that comes from the break in a person could easily bash someone on the head and kill them with out a stronge hate for them out of instinct.

also you can get out of the way of someone that is shooting and like you pointed out not everyone is super accurect

posted on January 26th, 2006, 12:14 am

it is valide its comin sins if you have to go up and strugal with some and look in thare eyes you will have to have more than just adrilan to kill tham.

a gun you just pull a tiger from far away its easy and quick.


its much hader to get away from a gun than eny uther non projectile wepond thats a fact and comin sens.

posted on January 26th, 2006, 12:15 am

that ******* who tried to rob tony martins house was a gypsy - he wouldnt have hesistated in harming tony martin 1 ******* second!

posted on January 26th, 2006, 12:19 am

yes i know i say that i sed it you read what i posted if he did not have a gun it whould posibly have givin the kid a chace to run.

[[TD]Roach]

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:09 am

Last edited by [TD]Roach on January 26th, 2006, 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

TD]Roach pepal are resposube for thare own behaver if thay are not mucher a nuff to hold a debate thay should not be posting here

ewm you don't know what responsible means.

what you did with those pictures of children that accidently died by gun shots was manipulating someones emotions. ASK yourself why you didn't show fat lazy 50 years olds? that died by accidental gun shootings.

because if you show that nobody cared about them.

if you show something about innocent sweet children that where murdered by guns. People start to think about their own children. It hits emotionally harder then a fat lazy ******* that dies.


you can't tell me that if you start spreading word about so many innocent children dying by guns that you aren't trying to manipulate someone into having certain ideas about guns.

i can do the same thing about mexican immigrants in america. lets campain they should get out of the country. Now in what way you should be doing that? By stirring up peoples emotion very hard. How?

show that statisticly more mexicans are involved in killing then caucasians. do that aswell with other things like theft and drug dealing. Show mexicans that live of governmnet pay roll and show that that they are just lazy and steal honnest white mens jobs.

These are all half truths only showing a minorty of what mexican immigrants do in the US. But if you continuesly show that on tv. people will change their oppion about the subject. That is done in sects, in Neo nazi groeps, in klux klux clans even Hitler did the same thing with Jews.

and how was that so succesfull? it was all playing on peoples fear. the people assumed that if you hear about it constatly, it must have been true.

you can also do such campains about not sending food in sudan where hunger takes millions of lives. just show the minority of the people that are hunger stricken who steal from from aid services and that kind of things. and people start thinking differently. It spreads hate.

what you did was the opposite. you gave those children an angelic status of innocence and playing on the fear of parents that the threat of loosing their child is very high if not dealt with guns.



but back on that shooting case, shooting an unarmed person is an offence. can't help you there. shooting unarmed people even if he is a burglar is an offence. you are only allowed to give warnings. things change if the burglar also has a weapon.