Proof of concept: Multi-vector assault mode

Announcements and news by us. Post comments about them here.
1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
posted on November 30th, 2007, 12:17 am
There are plenty of canon ships to work in for proper balancing, thats not possibly a reason for their introduction. As for older ships being phased out, yes, the Miranda and older Excelsiors were BEGINNING to finally be phased out, but they are still around Nemesis timeline, and will be until a larger amount of Akiras and such are produced.
posted on November 30th, 2007, 10:33 am
i meant non-cannon ships being neccesary for other races.
posted on November 30th, 2007, 11:04 am
For the Romulans and Dominion, yeah, both of those races definitely needed a couple of make up ships, (Although the Romulans already had a good number of fan made ships that would have fit the bill).
posted on November 30th, 2007, 4:19 pm
Fan made ships...are non canon just the same. I prefer the ships that FO made to fan made ships. If you notice fan made ships...they are ALL 'Tactical heavy super tactical cruiser with ablative armor and phase cloak battleship'. They're all mostly uber and unstoppable. Which is far worse than a realistically designed non-canon ship by the FO team.
posted on November 30th, 2007, 8:41 pm
Yup, it seems that usually fan made ships are all incredibly powerful and hence useless for an actual balanced game.
posted on December 1st, 2007, 1:37 am
Rhaz wrote:Fan made ships...are non canon just the same. I prefer the ships that FO made to fan made ships. If you notice fan made ships...they are ALL 'Tactical heavy super tactical cruiser with ablative armor and phase cloak battleship'. They're all mostly uber and unstoppable. Which is far worse than a realistically designed non-canon ship by the FO team.


I was referring to that Romulan Griffin class I think it is, as one of those potential fan made ships that have been around forever.
posted on December 1st, 2007, 5:46 pm
Ahhh, the Griffin from Armada 1 and Armada 2? That ships already in Flops, lol.
posted on December 1st, 2007, 7:26 pm
Just an example.
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 12:18 am
errr arnt we going slightly off topic here

will this MVAM be used for other ships or just promethius (also wot will be the odf code to get this working)
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 1:05 pm
Obviously it will only be used with the Prommie.
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 3:43 pm
in Fleet Operations its only used for the prometheus as a seperation weapon. the code will be puplished along with the next patch release :)
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 7:06 pm
What version patch are you aiming for to release with V3?
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 9:06 pm
PREATOR DEFIANT wrote:I was referring to that Romulan Griffin class I think it is, as one of those potential fan made ships that have been around forever.
The only non cannon ship that really doesn't bother me is the Achilles, and that is simply because it doesn't look insanely uncannon, it seems like something the federation would do. Back on topic though.
posted on December 2nd, 2007, 10:30 pm
Fullphaser wrote:The only non cannon ship that really doesn't bother me is the Achilles, and that is simply because it doesn't look insanely uncannon, it seems like something the federation would do. Back on topic though.


The Defiant is a ship that barely look canon at all, the Achilles on the other hand looks like a 3 year old's finger painting designed into a ship.
posted on December 19th, 2007, 12:02 pm
i cant wait for this patch to be released i'll be able to create the mod i always wanted[br]Posted on: December 07, 2007, 12:12:37 pm
ok sry for the double post but it has ben a while.
getting back onto topic will the seperated and refused ships contain the orig ship name and all damages bee kept. also would this work to make engaged armour work properly as the fused weapon keeps changing the ships name (unless i'm doing it wrong) thx
1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron