Th E Descent Class

Post ideas and suggestions on new features or improvements here.

Question: which ship should replace the Descent Class Dreadnaught?

Total votes: 25
Prometheus, with or without MVAM.11 votes (44%)
Galaxy 3, (or USS Titan as i call it).9 votes (36%)
Some other ship class, (post your proposal)1 votes (4%)
None, i like the Descent, leave it alone.4 votes (16%)
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
posted on October 18th, 2005, 10:06 pm
They sure do. Even if the Decsent is replaced, I would still like to see it in the map editor.
posted on October 19th, 2005, 4:02 am
Yike Galaxy three looks pretty ugly from where I am standing I am all for not the promethus but mabey a non expirimental versiona battle version of the prometheus with Q torps and MVAM
posted on October 19th, 2005, 12:30 pm
:o Ugly??? *Smacks Fullphaser upside the head with a pool cue* it looks cool. i think it makes a very worthy refit model, that the galaxy class's legacy can be proud of.
but, i suppose as Baron said:
Everyone has its own opinion I guess  :P

*mutters* j/k :D


better warp- Well, I always play with warp off, anyways  ;)

:huh: i don't think you get what i'm saying dude, you or anybody else has no choice about whether warp is turned off or not. you cant turn it on, that is unless your talking about another mod *gasps* i would purify you but my pool cue broke after i hit fullphaser with it so your safe... till i can find a new cue :D
posted on October 19th, 2005, 5:23 pm
Last edited by Ozymandias on October 19th, 2005, 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Personally I dont like the design for the Descent, so I do think it needs to be replaced the Galaxy-3 although not cannon is definatly what a refit of the galaxy could look like. It seems to have the same hull stile as the sovey and also assuming that technology is advancing can presumably have a more efficient worpcore, ie more energy for weapons and shields, so more shields and either more weapons or faster fireing weapons. Anyway I would at least like to see the Descent replaced, but not by the prometheus deffinatly. Perhaps it could be taken out and replaced by a different ship for each avatar.

p.s. Darn you beat me to posting the poll :P
posted on October 19th, 2005, 6:47 pm
:o Ugly??? *Smacks Fullphaser upside the head with a pool cue* it looks cool. i think it makes a very worthy refit model, that the galaxy class's legacy can be proud of.
but, i suppose as Baron said:

*mutters* j/k :D



:huh: i don't think you get what i'm saying dude, you or anybody else has no choice about whether warp is turned off or not. you cant turn it on, that is unless your talking about another mod *gasps* i would purify you but my pool cue broke after i hit fullphaser with it so your safe... till i can find a new cue :D

Now now I do not think we need to resort to violence... Heh I just do not (I hate when firefox pulls the find is actually the apostrophe stunt) think the Galaxy 3 fits the federation lineage it looks way to much like a bad attempt at a kitabash gone all wrong, it just looks ugly the prometheus on the othe hand has got that areodynamic appeal
posted on October 19th, 2005, 6:56 pm
i think we need to get optec or doca in to make a desision if they want to change the ship completely or just give it new textures
posted on October 19th, 2005, 9:31 pm
One thing I AM sure of... the Prometheus is NOT Dreadnaught material. It may be powerful, BUT IT'S JUST TO SMALL. At a mere 414 meters, it's smaller than the Akira, Nebula, Excelsior, and other larger class that NEVER WERE DREADNAUGHTS. Trekmania lists it as a Tactical cruiser, something I WHOLEHEARTELY AGREE WITH.
Trekmania
posted on October 19th, 2005, 9:38 pm
Now now I do not think we need to resort to violence... Heh I just do not (I hate when firefox pulls the find is actually the apostrophe stunt) think the Galaxy 3 fits the federation lineage it looks way to much like a bad attempt at a kitabash gone all wrong, it just looks ugly the prometheus on the othe hand has got that areodynamic appeal

The Prometheus definately deserves to be ingame, BUT it is simply NOT dreadnaught material.
posted on October 20th, 2005, 1:34 am
Lets just use the Prometheus, it's badass and canon.
posted on October 20th, 2005, 2:24 am
It beats throwing in that phaser cannon abomination.
posted on October 20th, 2005, 2:38 am
Lol
posted on October 20th, 2005, 4:13 am
i agree with PD and Rhaz the gal 3 duss not work well in fo.
posted on October 20th, 2005, 12:29 pm
i agree with PD and Rhaz the gal 3 duss not work well in fo.

and you know this how? considering its never been in FO :rolleyes:

It beats throwing in that phaser cannon abomination.

er if i'm not mistaken, doesn't the Phalanx class have that "phaser canon abomination"? :shifty:

well it looks like the Prommie is winning (by quite a margin) BOOO :P

@fullphaser :
Heh I just do not (I hate when firefox pulls the find is actually the apostrophe stunt)
:huh: this means??
posted on October 20th, 2005, 9:22 pm
Lets just use the Prometheus, it's badass and canon.

As a DREADNAUGHT?!? You might wanna check your ship for radiation leaks, cause somethin' must be fryin' your BRAIN! :lol:
posted on October 20th, 2005, 9:28 pm
I don't recall saying it should be used as a dreadnought class dumbass.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests

cron