Replacing Decent Class

posted on January 4th, 2007, 2:13 am

I think he's talking about the Galaxy Mrk III Listed in some novels and supposedly appearing at the end of the Dominion War... Basically a Galaxy with Intrepid and Soverign class tech like EMH, bio-nueral computers, etc...

and while you could debate till doomsday if the Super-Dreadnought Galaxy-X is cannon, It definitely doesn't belong in fleet ops

[Silver Gryphon]

posted on January 4th, 2007, 2:22 am

Last edited by Silver Gryphon on January 4th, 2007, 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

I gotta agree with eoraptor. the galaxy X was a cool hot rod that was a great frolic and lots of fun for one episode. they had a right to go out with a bang I think that they should replace the current descent model with a model reminiscent of the prommy. IE; arrowhead saucer, Keep the nacells excelsior 2 style though. And only 1 blasted drive section hull!!!! That thing is even more outlandish than the Gal-X with its twin defelctors (Talk about superfluous (Its a fun model, just not a good regular timeline ship ) After all its logical that one of starfleet's most powerful ships would be a spinoff of a battleship prototype And it needs some sort of special ability.

posted on January 4th, 2007, 2:58 am

Well, The Phobos Mesh has twin drive-hulls, and no one complains about it! Maybe it's an execution rather than a design thing.

posted on January 5th, 2007, 12:38 am

I think he's talking about the Galaxy Mrk III Listed in some novels and supposedly appearing at the end of the Dominion War... Basically a Galaxy with Intrepid and Soverign class tech like EMH, bio-nueral computers, etc...

and while you could debate till doomsday if the Super-Dreadnought Galaxy-X is cannon, It definitely doesn't belong in fleet ops

lol, I think you give the Galaxy 3 too much credit.

It actually never appeared in any reliable source. I only like it because it seems to be what a post-dominion war retrofit of the Galaxy would look like, with the more sovy-ish hull and soxy nacelles, and a sovy deflector dish as well. It's just like the relation between the Constitution class and the refitted Constitution class (e.g. Ent-A). Too bad I lost my pics of it.

Oh, btw do you have a pic of the Phobos anywhere?

posted on January 5th, 2007, 3:19 am

Well then they should replace the galay model with a mark 3 model, alter the name and stats slightly and thatd help continuity

[eoraptor]

posted on January 5th, 2007, 8:05 pm

Last edited by eoraptor on January 5th, 2007, 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

RedShirt,Jan 5 2007, 01:38 AM] lol, I think you give the Galaxy 3 too much credit. 

It actually never appeared in any reliable source.  I only like it because it seems to be what a post-dominion war retrofit of the Galaxy would look like, with the more sovy-ish hull and soxy nacelles, and a sovy deflector dish as well.  It's just like the relation between the Constitution class and the refitted Constitution class (e.g. Ent-A).  Too bad I lost my pics of it. 

Oh, btw do you have a pic of the Phobos anywhere?

I'll have to dig for my renders... a lot seem to have disappeared... if not, I'll boot to XP and do up one right quick.

[edit] as promised

Attachments

[Anonymous]

posted on January 7th, 2007, 2:48 am

Last edited by Anonymous on January 7th, 2007, 2:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

I does have double hulls, BUT it's an stand-alone design and therefore could be made to use one centralized core WITHOUT haveing to do major logistical headaches from rerouting everything and making room for a new core, as would have to be the case with the Descent.

posted on March 31st, 2009, 2:11 am

well lookign at those ship websites

FEDERATION STARFLEET

that one seems to have some very nice ships, could be incorperated well

i wonder if theres some out there for other races.......

posted on March 31st, 2009, 2:14 am

Ray, when it asks you whether you want to post in this thread because it has been inactive for TWO YEARS, think, don't post. The Descent Class has already been changed, this thread is outdated and not the place for new Federation ship designs 

posted on March 31st, 2009, 3:05 am

Wouldn't it be an idea to lock threads after they outlive their usefullness?

posted on March 31st, 2009, 3:31 am

i was posting for that fact that it had websites with cool ship designs whats wrong with that?

and i was asking the peopel who had posted those ship designs if there were any others for other races, for the groupd expirience idea thats beaing started,

but seriosuly its like everything i do know, has a whole swarm of negativity comming to it, you didnt have to respond to this post, so why do you always call everything i say stupid, seriosuly i should just lave fleet ops.............

posted on March 31st, 2009, 3:34 am

You should start a new thread then titled something like "Cool Ship Designs for the Federation" ... instead of posting them in a thread about the Descent, which has already been changed... in a version of the game that is already released...

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 4:42 pm

5 words: excalibur class transwarp heavy destroyer

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 4:50 pm

5 words: excalibur class transwarp heavy destroyer

9 words: that ships ugly, this thread is 2 years old.

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 4:55 pm

i just answered to it, cause it was pushed to the top