Officer/Vet new ability ideas

posted on November 4th, 2010, 4:27 pm

This one, the 4-nacelled Galaxy with blue markings. Unfortunatly, it's a Bridge Commander ship...

CRs Europa (2.0)

Attachments

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:19 pm

And those other ships are not galaxy class. They just have their saucer built in the same general style, same as with teh Nebula class.

Cheyenne class you mean. Big difference.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:34 pm

Cheyenne and Nebula are both variants of the Galaxy saucer .  The Cheyenne was just made as a "wreckage" ship for the Wolf 359 scene in TNG.  The Nebbie was actually used, but they were both supposed to be part of a litter of vessels based on the Galaxy design.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:38 pm

Yeah, but the design didnt go past the appearence, size wise theyre quite differnt, that only changed with teh SGI nebulas when the CGI folks took the easy route and just used a galaxy saucer, of the same size.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:42 pm

This one, the 4-nacelled Galaxy with blue markings. Unfortunately, it's a Bridge Commander ship...

CRs Europa (2.0)

No offense, but i find that design hideous.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:45 pm

If you don't like it, that's your opinion. Not offensive, since everyone likes things others don't.

Yeah, but the design didnt go past the appearence, size wise theyre quite differnt, that only changed with teh SGI nebulas when the CGI folks took the easy route and just used a galaxy saucer, of the same size.

Cheyenne and Nebula are both variants of the Galaxy saucer .  The Cheyenne was just made as a "wreckage" ship for the Wolf 359 scene in TNG.  The Nebbie was actually used, but they were both supposed to be part of a litter of vessels based on the Galaxy design.

The Cheyenne saucer isn't only made from a smaller model, but both side use the lower saucer. Funnily enough, it looks different yet the details weren't changed.

They're from the same family, though.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 7:48 pm

Aye, they are, IIRC the in story reason give was that logisticaly making ships that share as many systems and components as possible simply makes more sense, especily systems that WOULD need regular replacement, such as outer hull plates.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 8:13 pm

No offense, but i find that design hideous.

i agree, how many more nacelles are they gonna blu tack onto a galaxy.

posted on November 4th, 2010, 8:15 pm

Wanna place a bet?

posted on November 4th, 2010, 8:29 pm

Wanna place a bet?

i am scared id lose that bet lol.

[John1337]

posted on November 8th, 2010, 6:06 pm

Last edited by John1337 on November 8th, 2010, 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

What about this "splitting" photon torpedo for a vet or an ability?

btw: the .gif should load in the next seconds ... 12 mb overall

posted on November 8th, 2010, 9:23 pm

I think that was the idea behind the type 3 torpedoes

posted on November 8th, 2010, 9:28 pm

Can't....stop....watching....gif.....


But yes, as Dom said I think that was the intention of the type-3 torpedoes 

posted on November 12th, 2010, 7:00 pm

What about this "splitting" photon torpedo for a vet or an ability?

btw: the .gif should load in the next seconds ... 12 mb overall

As the folks above said..... we allready have it ingame, type3 torps