Cheetah Class

Post ideas and suggestions on new features or improvements here.
1, 2, 3
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:05 pm
Dominus_Noctis wrote:Silly Boggz, the two on top are the two on the bottom   :D

Repeat after me: there are only TWO (count 'em) nacelles .... wuuuuuuuuuooon tuuuuuuuooo  :innocent:


  Lol .... WHAT?
 
  How can they be on the top and the bottom?  :D
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:06 pm
:lol:
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:08 pm
Boggz + Hamster = 2 nacelles are four nacelles

Solution: Decouple the hamster from your head  :woot:
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:09 pm
its like a head crab
there's only one solution

..

..

crowbars for all
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:19 pm
RedEyedRaven wrote:Boggz + Hamster = 2 nacelles are four nacelles

Solution: Decouple the hamster from your head  :woot:


  The Hamster is non-detachable.  We iz not a Galaxy-class Star-vizzle :D.

  So are the two visible nacelles the only ones there?  There are two on top.  Are there just none on the bottom either?
posted on March 27th, 2010, 11:21 pm
Boggz wrote:  The Hamster is non-detachable.  We iz not a Galaxy-class Star-vizzle :D.

  So are the two visible nacelles the only ones there?  There are two on top.  Are there just none on the bottom either?


You are Boggzter.  :thumbsup:


Yes, there are only two :)
posted on March 28th, 2010, 12:24 am
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS NACELLES

kidding theres only 2
posted on March 28th, 2010, 1:14 am
When I read this topic, my brain said this:

Cheetah Class = Romulan Original Design Ship

Needless to say, I was kind of surprised and disappointed.  But I'll get over it.

Regards,
-Grey
posted on March 30th, 2010, 3:42 am
myleswolfers wrote:THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS NACELLES

kidding theres only 2
I was waiting for that joke.  :whistling: I would like to see more non-standard classes like the constellation, the remore is one of the cooler looking designs in the game IMhO because it's laid out differently from the default nacelle/hull/saucer design. same reason I'd like to see a centaur'esque design or more miranda style ships.

:sweatdrop:
but I'm weird like that
posted on March 30th, 2010, 8:49 am
I can understand that, they're more interesting when they have an unusual shape.
posted on April 1st, 2010, 4:27 pm
Very cool Tyler. Im for having this put in, all three variants.

Where do you see this in the FO tech tree though? Or As a warp-in?
posted on April 1st, 2010, 6:02 pm
I was wondering if this could be a Warp-in.

And I found out the difference with the Constellation to the Cheetah... it is the underside of the saucer.

Appearently it has ventral side torpedo tubes and maybe somekind of guidance beam (what is that pointy thing for anyway?).

Attachments

Schematic_Constellation.jpg
posted on April 1st, 2010, 7:00 pm
i think the constellation would be a good ship to see as warpin. just cos it was in canon lol.
posted on April 1st, 2010, 7:03 pm
So... old.... I mean they were being scrapped when the Galaxy was fairly new  :sweatdrop:
posted on April 1st, 2010, 7:07 pm
maybe a war refit like the excel I. just not as powerful. i think they were probably commissioned around the time of the excel I, they appear TMP era ish.
1, 2, 3
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

cron