Nerf the warp-in 2010. We need YOUR vote !!!
You feel like a battlecruiser is too weak or a race too strong? Go ahead and discuss it here :)

Question: Would You support the warp-in nerf idea

Total votes: 67
Yes, I'm a warp-in nerf idea supporter20 votes (30%)
No, I fail at life47 votes (70%)
1, 2, 3, 4
tom
User avatar
Topic Starter
333 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:49 pm
Last edited by tom on January 8th, 2010, 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seeing Warp-in balancing thread turned into a great war of OP vs UP, i want my own, so:

Please support the warp-in nerf idea. We guarantee a better future for You and Your children.

[glow=red,2,300]VOTE WARP-IN NERF 2010[/glow]



and remember: its not your privilege, it's your STINKIN' DUTY

EDIT: I fail at English
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:51 pm
Amusing options...
Boggz
User avatar
Donator
3111 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:51 pm
Lol :D


  I don't know if I'm saying it needs a nerf, it (or more likely SFC) just needs a supply cost so that it's on par with the way the other factions get more ships out early  ^-^.


Cute idea with the spin-off though.
Mal
User avatar
Donator
2736 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:54 pm
What if you need to choose both options? :whistling:
Dukemts
User avatar
68 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:54 pm
remind me again "Nerf"? Sorry forgot...
such a muppet i am.

:fish:
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:55 pm
Make its usefulness go the way of the Galaxy.
Dukemts
User avatar
68 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:56 pm
Oh, thanks
:woot: :thumbsup:
Boggz
User avatar
Donator
3111 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 10:58 pm
Lol you guys are so touchy when it comes to altering the Feds at all  :lol:.

 NOOOO DON'T TAKE AWAY MY PLASMA COIL NORWAY-SPAM!  I NEEEEEDS IT TO PWNZORS   :crybaby:

 NOOOO DON'T TAKE AWAY MY SENSOR BLACKOUT SPAM!!!!!!  I NEEEEEEDS IT TO PWNZORS     :crybaby:

 NOOOO DON'T TAKE AWAY MY COMPLETELY FREE CANNON FODDER!  WE NEEDSES IT SO BADSSSSSS   :crybaby:
tom
User avatar
Topic Starter
333 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:00 pm
Tyler wrote:Amusing options...

Boggz wrote:Cute idea with the spin-off though.

Thank you.

[align=center]VOTE WARP-IN NERF 2010[/align]
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:01 pm
Boggz wrote:Lol you guys are so touchy when it comes to altering the Feds at all  :lol:.

I'm only touchy about the Galaxy, which has already become non-buildable.

Galaxy.
Boggz
User avatar
Donator
3111 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:02 pm
Tyler wrote:I'm only touchy about the Galaxy, which has already become non-buildable.

Galaxy.


But it's not useless!  Battleships at 5 minutes ftw!!!! :)
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:03 pm
Battleship with mult-targeting torps that have no energy cost. In your face, Vector Torpedo.
tom
User avatar
Topic Starter
333 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:11 pm
Mal wrote:What if you need to choose both options? :whistling:

there is only one good option, if u still hesitate -> VOTE WARP-IN NERF 2010
ISS_Enterprise_D
User avatar
276 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:12 pm
Tyler wrote:Battleship with mult-targeting torps that have no energy cost. In your face, Vector Torpedo.


VETERAN Battleship with shield-breaking multi-targeting torpedoes that have no energy cost. Suck it, Mixed-Tech Sang
The Undying Nephalim
User avatar
844 posts
posted on January 8th, 2010, 11:18 pm
I don't think my Borg Cube can possibly survive that without some nerf.....
1, 2, 3, 4
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron