Dear GOD, thats wrong.

posted on May 28th, 2010, 8:25 pm

The other people are just jealous they can't get in bed with Kirk.

posted on May 28th, 2010, 9:29 pm

He probably will sleep with anything that he can talk to, it was even implied in an episode he slept with that girl who was a monster with hundreds of tentacles in disguise after Spock told him what she really was.

 

Dear LORD....I'm on an airplane home right now and I literally busted out a loud guffaw for that one.  I can't hear what ppl are saying....go go NC headphones!

[Nebula_Class_Ftw]

posted on May 28th, 2010, 9:51 pm

Last edited by Nebula_Class_Ftw on May 28th, 2010, 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Even worse is that her (its?) people took over the ship after dehydrating most of the crew into dodecahedrons of salts. They even crushed one dodecahedron just to prove a point. And he still slept with her. Scotty was the one actually doing something helpful (getting the aliens drunk.) Kirk did help a little bit by showing the aliens love, but he could've done more if he kept it in his pants.

You know Kirk would've banged that floating energy cloud if Zephyryn Cochrane wasn't married to it (maybe even then if the cloud wasn't so hostile...)

posted on May 29th, 2010, 3:44 am

Kirk...keep it in his pants?  The man couldn't even keep his shirt on!

They made a bloody 'Shirtless Kirk' card for the CCG, for crying out loud!

James Tiberius Kirk is a synonym for slut.

posted on May 29th, 2010, 3:55 am

The whole "no relationships between officers of different ranks" thing was invented by Voyager if I remember correctly (and firmly glued in place by Enterprise.) Some sexual tension would certainly make Star Trek II,III, and IV more interesting...

I think TNG had a bit of that as well. Regardless, those rules may refer to chain of command rather than rank and may only apply to direct subordinates. Thus it would be inappropriate for Picard to have a relationship with any officer or enlisted personal on his ship but there's nothing wrong with Geordi getting it on with an ensign from the science department. There may be a lot of unwritten rules surrounding it as well.

Kirk...keep it in his pants?  The man couldn't even keep his shirt on!

They made a bloody 'Shirtless Kirk' card for the CCG, for crying out loud!

James Tiberius Kirk is a synonym for slut.

Ouch!  but not necessarily wrong...

[Tyler]

posted on May 29th, 2010, 4:01 am

Last edited by Tyler on May 29th, 2010, 4:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kirk isn't the posterchild of Anything that Moves for nothing.

Kirk was trying to manipulate tenticle woman as part of the plan to get the ship back. He just picked the method that suits him best.

I think TNG had a bit of that as well. Regardless, those rules may refer to chain of command rather than rank and may only apply to direct subordinates. Thus it would be inappropriate for Picard to have a relationship with any officer or enlisted personal on his ship but there's nothing wrong with Geordi getting it on with an ensign from the science department. There may be a lot of unwritten rules surrounding it as well.

TNG seemed rather open-minded about crew relationships. Picard and Nella Daren didn't seem to be much of a problem and was accepted by the most of the crew, and she was a Lieutenant Commander and Stellar Sciences head. Low success rate, but not unusual.

It was just Janeway that had a problem with it, most likely more of a personal view.

[navyguy]

posted on May 29th, 2010, 5:13 am

Last edited by navyguy on May 29th, 2010, 5:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Why do pepole feel the need to push the "gay issue" iam for one sick of hearing about gays, if thats what you do behind your own doors fine, dont bring it up when it has no bearing here, really. STAR TREK IS ABOUT EXPLORATION NOT HOMOSEXUALITY.

posted on May 29th, 2010, 10:45 am

No-one's 'pushing' anything, Kirk/Spock merely happens to be a popular subject.

A big part of Trek is giving moral messages, promoting a better way of thinking. Exploring is seondary and minor. The lack of gay in Trek is why it's relevent to Trek.

posted on May 30th, 2010, 2:27 am

http://www.entertainmentearth.com/prodinfo.asp?number=GK69854

This link, right here, sums up the legacy of James T. Kirk.

posted on May 30th, 2010, 5:50 am

whats even sexual about that?

posted on May 30th, 2010, 2:16 pm

It's Cologne, as in, stuff you put on to try to get laid (male equivalent of perfume.)

posted on May 30th, 2010, 3:55 pm

Dont ask don't tell. hummm

Dont say any thing that has me feel like the world is not built for you!

Can you see exploration is about looking at all that things including gay issues? I promises you gay will exist in the future.

Why do pepole feel the need to push the "gay issue" iam for one sick of hearing about gays, if thats what you do behind your own doors fine, dont bring it up when it has no bearing here, really. STAR TREK IS ABOUT EXPLORATION NOT HOMOSEXUALITY.

If you paint a trash can gold, its still a trash can!  -Nikki Sixx
Part of being narmal is painting trash cans gold. Part of being exstrodanary is buying paint remover.