Mac Vs Pc

posted on September 25th, 2006, 12:55 am

Ewm do u actually read what i post or do you just reply in ewmlish with what you think i say ?

Look I dont do Video editing and i know you dont either so you can scratch that as a point to getting a mac

[ewm90]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 1:02 am

Last edited by ewm90 on September 25th, 2006, 1:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

Do some reserch man. I learnd the basics of DV speshal efects on after efects on a mac. I am inthe graphics word and spind time arownd 3d artist VD artists and more. Pleace dont prech tp me about what is better for vidoe editing I know what duss what.

Dont underestimate me be cuss of my spelling. Meny of this earths gratest minds where dislexsic.

[Frodo]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 2:00 pm

Last edited by Frodo on September 25th, 2006, 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

the PC is much better for editing, especially now with the powerful processors and graphics cards. I've been to the editing studios of UK television channels and they have a few imacs but everything is mainly done on PC. it can not be denied that the PC with any OS is better all round nor can it be denied that the iMac is rubbish and sales figures are on the drop. if the Mac had summt better then the PC then they would have grabbed a bigger slice of the market, Microsoft can not be accused of sabotaging the Mac either. the mac fought well but its just not good enuf.

posted on September 25th, 2006, 3:11 pm

Oh shut the **** up ewm seriously you dont even read what i post and then you just reply with your own bullshit seriously

this is the kinda **** that made me flame you before

posted on September 25th, 2006, 3:28 pm

What kind of horse **** is this that I missed 3 pages.

Ewm, tell me one good reason why after effects is better on a Mac than a PC.

posted on September 25th, 2006, 4:31 pm

I just speek the truth.

Frodo it is true that PCs have better vido cars with makes tham better for rindering movies. But MACs have hier bit rates and more colors than PCs do. Macs all so use much less ram in thare OSs than windows used wich meens more can be load at one time than can be loaded on PC.

MACs and PCs use the same proseser.... IMACS are not for editing..... some perfer MACs for editing some like PCs you have to see what works for you best.

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:13 pm

Oh my God when will you learn

What gave you the Idea that Macs have higher Colour bit rates thats a lie what can you get on a mac ? 24bit 32bit ?

Same as a ******* pc is what it is

And dont give me crap about Ram, If you own a pc and you want to spend money on editiing you can get up to 4gb ram alot cheaper than you could if it was on a mac

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:37 pm

You can get up to 16Gb if you buy a server mobo... and Apple ram is no better than PC ram. If anything its the same **** sold by apple, not to mention apple doesnt even use the ram with the higehst bus speed.

[ewm90]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:37 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on September 25th, 2006, 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Thay get 64 bits at lest 2x what windows gets.

Look stuff up be for you post some thing man.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301341 < offishal site for MAC osx tiger systom requerments

Its the same man dude same price. Mac OSX tiger used 256MB min to run At least 3 GB of free disk space

Windows offisal site for Vista requierments: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvi...e/vistarpc.mspx
512 MB min to run win XP 1GB recomended. 40 GB HD + 15 GB free.

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:42 pm

Yah, and ive seen XP run decent on an ainchent laptop with 128mb of ram, dont try and bullshit a bullshit.

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:42 pm

Ewm you keep pushing this 64 bit video capability i just curious what does that allow MACs to do that PCs can not?

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:46 pm

OK F U c k you ewm where do we begin

1, The human eye cant even tell past 24bits
2, What the **** are you talking about Vista isnt the current OS windows XP is and windows XP runs at 256mb so STFU

and another thing PC ram is cheaper than Mac ram ever figure that one out ?

Seriously ewm stop protecting the Macs they have nothing going for them its all alot of bullshit for people who are thick

[redmanmark86]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:52 pm

Last edited by redmanmark86 on September 25th, 2006, 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

well i do 3d modelling and i also do video editing and my mate does video editing in uni.

now i wont lie he will tell you for video editing he prefers mac, mainly cuz he just finds them more unreliable and less prone to crashing. and i believe cuz he finds final cut pro and adobe after effects just a lil bit easier to use.

but he will tell you any day a PC is better though for sheer compatiablility and 3d party support. you know i read that for every one mac program your find 1000 windows versions. mac have to do most of the work themselves cuz no1 really develops for it and they dont give you much uprade options either and so you know, even though the MAC now uses intel chips, due to the fact most programs have not yet be re writtern in the new extensions the mac has to emulate so is 4 times slower then its current IBM younger brother!!!

lets see who can make a better PC or Mac with 700 pounds yhea EWM

[ewm90]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 5:54 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on September 25th, 2006, 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Run more color hirer refedh rates. it lets you alicate more ram to systom aplications and less to the Oprating systom. It lests you run your aplications in a very stamable invierment evin more so than linex. Macs have a biltin intagrated FTP program that is much easer to use than pulling ftp stuff up in the browser wich window duss not. Mac has a font crictor list wich displays all avlibal fonts for each type face alll windows has is a the alfa numaric key pad. Mac is much more frindly to PC meda than PC is to Mac meda. MACs are eser to fix when and if some thing gose rong. Macs have a Far superer UI than windows is useing that is verchaly the same as WIN 95.

Thares a few exsampals for you SHO260.


cts006 you are refering to Windows XP not Microsoft Windows Vista Beta 2 that I was tolking about.

Acording to wikipedia vistas Color management.
Windows Color System features a completely redesigned Color Infrastructure and Translation Engine (CITE) at its core. It is backed up by an enhanced color processing pipeline that supports bit-depths more than 32 bits per pixel, multiple color channels (more than 3), alternative color spaces and high dynamic range coloring, using a technology named Kyuanos[20]

posted on September 25th, 2006, 6:00 pm

First off ewm, "Run more color hirer refedh rates. it lets you alicate more ram to systom aplications and less to the Oprating systom." that statement is absolute bullshit.

Second of all, apple ahs been reduced to making there own FTP program as no-one else would, where as you ahve like 200 different 3rd party ones that are amazing for the PC. Mac more friendly to PC media my ***... It doesnt even come with a program for viewing fullscreen videos mac or pc media.

The win95 interface, whcich I actuly use since I always go back to the classic interface rather than the ugly XP one. Is still around because it works, its light weight, and people like it. I was also refering to XP as you mentioned it above and it is the current version of windows, sine vista is like 6 months off.