Mac Vs Pc

Want to say something off topic? Something that has nothing to do with Trek? Post it here.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9
posted on August 6th, 2006, 1:49 am
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:00 am
Last edited by ewm90 on August 6th, 2006, 2:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cens thay use the same prosesors I find that strange thay use the same ram same muther bords same hard drives... What am i mising


Well I have not eather that is true in the past the parts wher a bit difrant so if you used a part that was not oked by the appal computer comany you mite have probloms tbut those days are behind us.

Well being a graphic artist I think thay are very very good investment.

I do I looked at the dell form looked at uther froms of people how had the same computer as I did and no one has a sultion.

Ya I consinter a new power suply but than I would still have to get a new muther bord and prosor than whould wont more ram by that pont I thot I mite as well get a new computer. and yes if you cool down computers thay do run faster. but that still would not help me with upgrading ram aand uther computer componits. But thanks for the tip.

Yes as far as I know thay are very sinaler to PCs now.

Image


That site duss not tuch core dule prossors.
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:09 am
Bottom line Macs are over priced for what they offer you can even see that now but go waste ur money on it
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:13 am
Well being in the graphics I need one I have used a Pc for a long time and fownd that macs are so much better for that. and now that thay used intell thay are evin better.

Image
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:16 am
well if you say so but all the benchmarks say otherwise for performance

and the fact that the pc's are more cost effective says it all

and proof ofcourse is the fact that business dont use macs they use windows instead :P
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:16 am
dude just go buy a PC that uses intel, and why do you keep posting those images? :blink: whatever advantages that a mac has over a PC is gonna be negligable at best.
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:20 am
Well thats not ben my exsperise Macs color display and refresh rates are not maginal at all thay are very notisasabule.

Image
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:25 am
ok dude stop with the pictures its just getting annoying theres no need

secondly think what you will but CTS has proof that the mac monitors alone are crappy compared to other brands and to top it off they tend to be twice as expensive
posted on August 6th, 2006, 2:28 am
Thanks for the tip I was un aware of that fact.
posted on August 7th, 2006, 6:36 am
Last edited by Smoerebroed on August 7th, 2006, 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only thing i can contribute is the following link; Accept it from me with a smirk and a sarcastic grin:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=67867270

EDIT: happy flaming and good luck in your holy quest for righteousness
posted on August 7th, 2006, 11:43 am
hahaha thats funny
posted on August 7th, 2006, 12:20 pm
Last edited by Smoerebroed on August 7th, 2006, 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sad but true, we already had a reference to the nationalsocialists
posted on August 7th, 2006, 3:09 pm
What is this about the refresh rates... It does not matter that OSX comes with its refresh rate set higher than Win XP, since Apple doesnt even sell a monitor that has a refresh rate with there mac's.

"Much of the discussion of refresh rate does not apply to LCD monitors. This is because while a phosphor on a CRT will begin to dim as soon as the electron beam passes it, LCD cells open to pass a continuous stream of light, and do not dim until instructed to produce a darker color." - Wiki Refresh Rate
posted on September 21st, 2006, 2:46 am
you know reading this today just wanted me to post this here


http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=34491
posted on September 21st, 2006, 5:18 am
Last edited by ewm90 on September 21st, 2006, 5:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Well thare is a bug with this new swich to the new prosser made by intell that has messed up macs abulty to run some apilcations. It you whate for a wile untill thay werk the bugs out macs shers will go back up.

It makes no sens that mac is doing well and than for no reson faile... Well man thares a reson for every thing you just got to put 2 and 2 to gether.

cts006

What is this about the refresh rates... It does not matter that OSX comes with its refresh rate set higher than Win XP, since Apple doesnt even sell a monitor that has a refresh rate with there mac's.


ewm90- Well if I look at a Pc screen that has not had its refreshrate changed I get a head ake. If I look at a Mac I fell fine at all times.

cts006
"Much of the discussion of refresh rate does not apply to LCD monitors. This is because while a phosphor on a CRT will begin to dim as soon as the electron beam passes it, LCD cells open to pass a continuous stream of light, and do not dim until instructed to produce a darker color." - Wiki Refresh Rate

Well evin when macs only had CRT moniters the refrash rate was as hi as it is now. Macs have all ways had a hi refresh rate dating back to when the mac was called a appil.

Heres a pro appal link to make up for the nagitve one :P http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computerac...apple-imac-24in
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

cron