Bush 2

posted on November 14th, 2004, 12:17 pm

we whood not be if thare was not reson to be. looking at this prees kariter it realt says to me nothing is inposabul with him.

he has shon over and over that he duss not kare about amaricans that are not rich. it whood not supprise me if he evin thot we wher dumb.

so it not a big step for me to see the pree saying those dumb pepal can be fored to jone the milatry and be told its good.

posted on November 14th, 2004, 12:20 pm

without the conflict in middleeast, he wouldnt be the president anymore. and thats a fact, i think, we all can agree.

posted on November 14th, 2004, 8:47 pm

I don't. I think a big reason he was voted on was religious and moral reasons. He's a Christian against things like abortion and gay marriage which Christians are against. Oddly, Kerry is a Catholic and he's not against any of those. I think thats a big reason why he lost, he was trying to play every side he could and didn't stand by his values.

I saw in a vote right before the election few people even cared about the war, and any new developments in it wouldn't change their mind about who they would vote for.

[ewm90]

posted on November 14th, 2004, 10:56 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on November 14th, 2004, 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

the resom my bush won in my iese are:

1. free of tarisam and arock ware 30%
2. distoshons and hipe 20%
3. relinon 10%
4. no gay marige, morle belifes, abortion 20%
5. other 20% econamy, thingin he a good presadent/grate preadent.

pepal voting for kary:

1. 40% so bush duss not win.
2. 25% think he a good presadent and coo help amrica recover the det and help the helth care syitom bild back op help re stabal lise forin relashons... and on and on
3. 5% he is a Grate presadent
4. 15% be cuss he is a dimacrat.
5. 15% his milatry recerd and thing he is beter with sucraty.
6. 5% distoshons and hipe.

this is a basic barack dawn its more complicated and miny more ishowe but maby this will help.

my nubers mite be abit odff but thates a crowed back dawn of the voters.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 12:43 am

Most of that makes sense, some kerry stuff dosen't. "3. 5% he is a Grate presadent" lol, 1 he wasen't president and 2 why is he great? Another was his military record, how would that make him better with security?

[ewm90]

posted on November 15th, 2004, 12:46 am

Last edited by ewm90 on November 15th, 2004, 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

thes nubers are not facts. thay are specluation

and this is haw i see most pepal feeling about bush and karry.


if he has a milatary recerd he whood know haw the milatry works and what it can and cant do. and how it thinks. and he has served in it and has bin sint in to combate sho he has ferst hand exspresn of what a solger can be exspekted to do in combat.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 12:47 am

Simply stateing some of it dosen't make sense.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 12:50 am

it makes sins to me what do you think pepal feel about the formaer canidates for presadent?

posted on November 15th, 2004, 2:00 am

Well the voting was nearly half for each candidate, so how can you put 5% of people voted for Kerry because they think he is a great president and not Bush?

[ewm90]

posted on November 15th, 2004, 2:20 am

Last edited by ewm90 on November 15th, 2004, 2:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

i cant beev that eny time thare is a cadate thater all was are core suporters that bellev he is a nuther JFK. and it was not 1% or he whood not have ben nomanated as the dimacratic canidate.


the order thare listed in duss not meen eny thing 1.-6.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 2:43 am

JFK? who is that? is that the person who made the harry potter books?

posted on November 15th, 2004, 3:06 am

jon F kinady a very famis amrican presadent how got shot and kiled wile as preadent.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 3:15 am

then how did he make the harry potter books if he is dead?

[ewm90]

posted on November 15th, 2004, 3:34 am

Last edited by ewm90 on November 15th, 2004, 3:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

i am not sher but is was not a former american presadent that had haff his hed shot off.

posted on November 15th, 2004, 6:20 am

I'm not sure where you guys are getting the impression that the US military is full of dumb people. Sure some rear-area supply types are beating up criminals and terrorists in Abu Ghraib or whatever, but the guys who are doing the shooting in the Combat Arms units are typically pretty smart, or else they'd be dead by now.