V3 Canaveral Design. It's Your Vote That Counts!

[Optec]

posted on January 4th, 2005, 1:10 am

Last edited by Optec on January 4th, 2005, 1:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

To take a small break from all the Dominion stuff i just decided to make a new design for one of the oldest Federation ships. The Canaveral Class. The model which is still in use was one of the first i ever did ^_^
I think i got up with a acceptable basic design but i'm still undecided were to put the nacells. Therefore i will let the fans decide! Vote now!

Option A:


Option B:

[ewm90]

posted on January 4th, 2005, 1:30 am

Last edited by ewm90 on January 4th, 2005, 1:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

i like Option A:
i whood like it more if the war engens wher not tilted at all. ,but that are both realy cool desinse.

what i meen is that the warp engens are ponted tord the sides and i tthink that a need consept.
but i think i whood like it a lital bit beter if thare was a whay it figer out a whay to make that poned as thay are in the ncc-1701-e.

posted on January 4th, 2005, 1:36 am

I personally liked option A more. It looked better with it's nacells up.

posted on January 4th, 2005, 2:40 am

oe posably use a difrant look for the worp engens.

posted on January 4th, 2005, 6:54 am

They are kinda E-E looking. Maybe if they were tilted at a 45 degree angle instead of what looks like around 15-20. That or completely upwards like the Excelsior/Ambassadore where the attachment comes out and curves upwards.

That and possibly change Necel the design to look more TNG style or like the ones on the Akira.

[Thunderbolt]

posted on January 4th, 2005, 1:07 pm

Last edited by Thunderbolt on January 4th, 2005, 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Hi there Fleetops crew nice mod beta 2 here nice interesting ships way better than A2 and I can't wait till 3.0 comes out it looks brilliant the dominion looks great. Anyway I think option A would look good or maybe higher angled nacels to 45 degrees like what Preator said.
Great Job and Happy New Year

Andy

posted on January 4th, 2005, 1:25 pm

Thx, and Happy New Year to you too

Here is a new nacell design. what do you think about it? (just the nacell itself not the position)

posted on January 4th, 2005, 2:34 pm

the thing that bothers me is that i am so used to looking at the nacell design cerintly used. eny thing uther slite chage in direstion looks off.

if you wher to make that look like thare was no top and botom to the nacell design. like in kerks enterpise or the cerint werd enterpise that whood whrk beter for puting in a side.

but its ok to me as lick as thay to look like thay are ponted in the rong dirction. but i love the consept realy cool.

[Thunderbolt]

posted on January 4th, 2005, 4:57 pm

Last edited by Thunderbolt on January 4th, 2005, 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Yea that looks good it looks better than the other one, I think it looks good without the adjusted angle as the way it is

posted on January 4th, 2005, 6:05 pm

I like the new nacells. And for the positioning of the Nacells I vote for the A configuration.

posted on January 4th, 2005, 6:34 pm

kinda like this whood be cool i did it quick but this shood give you the idea of what i am thinking.

Attachments

posted on January 4th, 2005, 6:47 pm

or hers a nuther idea:

Attachments

canaveralnacell_2_.jpg (2.79 KiB) Viewed 888 times

canaveralnacell_2_.jpg (2.79 KiB) Viewed 888 times

posted on January 4th, 2005, 6:56 pm

hm yep, i think the new nacell will be textured like your first idea, ewm90

posted on January 4th, 2005, 7:38 pm

i like option A and i liked the old caneveral design

posted on January 6th, 2005, 10:29 pm

the new canaveral design w/ option A looks like a Nova class.....I prefer the third design optec, but, it is your choice that matters.