TaQ'roja mining station cost reduction

Post ideas and suggestions on new features or improvements here.
1, 2
posted on July 4th, 2011, 5:21 pm
Agreed.  Taq is the early game avatar (in theory) and suffers in some situations because her BoP's perform less well against small vessels than Martok's do.  This is a small change, but one that I'm sure would be tested before implemented.

  No need to lose your head over it, Drrr :lol:
posted on July 4th, 2011, 6:21 pm
Didn't all miners get a cost reduction back a long time ago?  If so, then the cost reduction Taq'roja got was nerfed.  So I see this as totally reasonable.  Obviously it'll be tested, but I think it's a great idea, Sgt. Cortez. :thumbsup:

Just keep in mind that a lot of these ideas aren't a danger to balance, because they can always be implemented in the redoes if they don't work with current balancing.  So suggesting ideas is never bad. ^-^  This one's actually a pretty small change, as we're talking about a small cost decrease on about 4 objects (in this case 4+ mining stations), which is not very troublesome.  It would be pretty clear to see what's going on after Optec and Detektor test things out. :D
posted on July 4th, 2011, 6:32 pm
I support this. :thumbsup:
posted on July 4th, 2011, 6:38 pm
Mal wrote:Didn't all miners get a cost reduction back a long time ago?  If so, then the cost reduction Taq'roja got was nerfed.  So I see this as totally reasonable.  Obviously it'll be tested, but I think it's a great idea, Sgt. Cortez. :thumbsup:

Just keep in mind that a lot of these ideas aren't a danger to balance, because they can always be implemented in the redoes if they don't work with current balancing.  So suggesting ideas is never bad. ^-^  This one's actually a pretty small change, as we're talking about a small cost decrease on about 4 objects (in this case 4+ mining stations), which is not very troublesome.  It would be pretty clear to see what's going on after Optec and Detektor test things out. :D


The percentage should be the same, but obviously the actual reduction will be less.
1, 2
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests