Miss rates

posted on June 21st, 2010, 5:52 am

flying a ship thru a  D'deridex would be beastly ill do it

posted on June 21st, 2010, 5:58 am

Flying through them is good, I'd probably try it with a Galaxy for the Evulz.

posted on June 21st, 2010, 10:34 am

Flying through them is good, I'd probably try it with a Galaxy for the Evulz.

you mean ramming speed? easy chewy.

would a galaxy fit through that gap, i would guess no.

posted on June 21st, 2010, 10:37 am

That's where the evil come in, because it most likely wouldn't. Those poor crews...

posted on June 21st, 2010, 10:42 am

Hi everyone, to return to the title of the topic : i like all the ideas quite much, except if there are technical/development reasons not to realize them!

posted on June 21st, 2010, 10:47 am

That's where the evil come in, because it most likely wouldn't. Those poor crews...

i thought u liked the galaxy class, yet you are willing to destroy one so callously, you are worse than troi.

lol i derailed my own thread.

posted on June 21st, 2010, 10:55 am

I do, but anyone can be a bastard when they feel like it. Don't go comparing people to miss 'state what's already been said', that just ain't right.

posted on June 21st, 2010, 11:01 am

sorry for comparing you to that thing, but the desire to crash a galaxy class starship is something u share 

posted on June 21st, 2010, 3:20 pm

Say what? It has over 1,000 people onboard and I don't give a shit about any of them? ENSIGN TAKE US TO RAMMING SPEED NOW, and prepare my...emergency beam-out  .

posted on June 21st, 2010, 8:03 pm

beam out to where?

posted on June 22nd, 2010, 5:06 pm

My cloaked Defiant of course  . Never forget to bring a cloaked escape ship in the event of otherwise certain doom.

posted on June 22nd, 2010, 5:14 pm

actualy i like most of the ideas, exept one:
Support ships should not have higher hit rates. Why? Support stays suport, not combat. Combat ships are made for aiming and shooting stuff, support not. If we change it, it would make combat ships senseless. And btw: Most guys on warships learn how to locate targets and how to avoid some stuff.
On the other side: it might make sense if you reduce the evade chances for support vessels, so those get hit more.

posted on June 22nd, 2010, 5:28 pm

actualy i like most of the ideas, exept one:
Support ships should not have higher hit rates. Why? Support stays suport, not combat. Combat ships are made for aiming and shooting stuff, support not. If we change it, it would make combat ships senseless. And btw: Most guys on warships learn how to locate targets and how to avoid some stuff.
On the other side: it might make sense if you reduce the evade chances for support vessels, so those get hit more.

missing the target is caused by enemy fooling with your sensors, support ships have good sensor arrays, so would be able to see through the ECM. they are filled with science-y stuff, and crew like jadzia dax, smart people who can figure out how to bypass ecm etc.

[Brother Gabriel]

posted on June 22nd, 2010, 5:39 pm

Last edited by Brother Gabriel on June 22nd, 2010, 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

combat prooven crews of combat vessels cant do that? 
think about it urself: vessels where the crew is trained for combat, trained to work against ships which also got those ecm stuff. common u cant be serios that a science guy aims better than one that is trained for it
edit:
remember: the best knowledge doesnt help if you dont know how to use it

posted on June 22nd, 2010, 5:50 pm

I think the advanced sensors of the science ships and the experience of the combat ship crews could realistically cancel, with neither being better at hitting their target.