Gameplay questions

posted on April 18th, 2011, 11:35 pm

Why does the klingon fleet lack a light weapons platform. I'd be nice at times to have a terrible and cheap turret.

Also has anyone considered moving the nova to chassis 1 with star fleet command or star fleet science as its second dependancy. Giving the feds a non short range unit choice.

posted on April 19th, 2011, 12:38 am

Giving the feds a non short range unit choice.

they already have one

it's called the "saber"

posted on April 19th, 2011, 12:46 am

Why does the klingon fleet lack a light weapons platform. I'd be nice at times to have a terrible and cheap turret.

It's called the b'rel. It even cloaks

posted on April 19th, 2011, 12:55 am

or Canaveral

posted on April 19th, 2011, 1:50 am

It's called the b'rel. It even cloaks

Thats not cheap considering the supply costs.

posted on April 19th, 2011, 3:04 am

See this is the kind of response I expect from flops players, not the passion and thoughtfulness I got in my romulan needs torpedoes post.

posted on April 19th, 2011, 5:38 am

haha well if you really want a cheap turret for the klingons you probably won't give them just because what warrior seeking honor would ever want a turret fighting for him?

posted on April 19th, 2011, 7:01 am

Klingons aren't meant to be turtlers in FO(similar to Romulans). You should bring the battle to the enemy and keep him from getting to your expansion. But if you really want to protect your expansion, the incredible HWP is just fine.

posted on April 19th, 2011, 9:27 am

Thats not cheap considering the supply costs.

But consider the possible supply gains if you use it correctly

Truth of the matter is that the Klingons have a number of fairly cheap capable vessels and a low level turret would be redundant.

posted on April 19th, 2011, 11:31 pm

they already have one

it's called the "saber"

I think he meant medium range. Feds lack medium range ships at lower levels.

posted on April 20th, 2011, 12:25 am

@Andre
More what i was saying is that the klingons have no "thowaway" ships.

posted on April 20th, 2011, 12:36 am

@Andre
More what i was saying is that the klingons have no "thowaway" ships.

brels

posted on April 20th, 2011, 1:11 am

Tokra you dont play klingon much do you? You cant throw away any of your ships and expect to win.

posted on April 20th, 2011, 1:16 am

Yea klingon ships take way to much supply to throw away, and by to much supply I mean any supply because of how expensive supply is for them. But still small klingon ships are great in the late game as raiders especially with team games

posted on April 20th, 2011, 3:52 am

Tokra you dont play klingon much do you? You cant throw away any of your ships and expect to win.

ktingas then :p .

But yeah, klinks supply is too heavy for smaller ships by a tad.