Bug: Veteran Sang' differences between avatars

posted on January 5th, 2010, 5:50 pm

A potential bug between the amount of damage done from TaQ'roja's Sang' on Veteran rank, and Martok's:

kliW_sangr61o:
damagebase = 23.081


kliW_sangZr61o
damagebase = 24.182

Shouldn't TaQ'roja's be doing more damage given the +2 in offensive power? Not Martok's?

Credit goes to Sutee for discovering this

posted on January 5th, 2010, 5:58 pm

How funny, maybe the Duras got cheated on from her torpedo supplier.

posted on January 5th, 2010, 5:59 pm

Since the TaQ'roja Sang has a higher value, I'd hardly consider this a bug considering TaQ'roja is the Z extension.

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:00 pm

Feel the need to correct Gamers statement  :thumbsup:

First mistake: Duras, it should be Duras' because their are two of the sisters

Second: Her, should be replace with there.

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:00 pm

If you check in game supposedly, the Martok ones kills much more strongly than TaQ'roja's  B)

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:03 pm

Feel the need to correct Gamers statement 

First mistake: Duras, it should be Duras' because their are two of the sisters

Second: Her, should be replace with there.

Duras since it is the family not the (long dead) sisters, and it is their for multiple people as far as I know.

If you check in game supposedly, the Martok ones kills much more strongly than TaQ'roja's  B)

The Z extension is the one doing more damage, which is the TaQ'roja avatar as it should be.

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:10 pm

The Z extension is the one doing more damage, which is the TaQ'roja avatar as it should be.

I will test again and post exact numbers, but in game I believe that the TaQ'roja avatar does less damage in game (as I stated in the post just before).

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:17 pm

Martok one has identical accuracy and hit chance, with less damage per shot. I don't see how it can cause more damage.

posted on January 5th, 2010, 6:19 pm

I don't know - going off something somebody else said: I'll get the results back in a few minutes

posted on January 5th, 2010, 7:08 pm

Seems my initial statement might be in error - maybe the way I did my testing is incorrect, but I will hold off for now and say I was wrong until I can justify the statement. Sorry about that