Star Trek XI - TV Spot 4 HD

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 5:30 pm

This is similar to other trailers but don,t be fooled it not the other trailers.


More info on trailer:

See Star Trek ‘Kids Trailer’ Aired During Kid’s Choice Awards (w/ Analysis) + Pine Appearance | TrekMovie.com

Side note:

In hind sight its probably not a good idea to go swimming in a warp core...

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 5:38 pm

The thing's gonna be a flop cause no one will take it seriously because of 1 simple reason: Simon Pegg, a very good comedian, is playing a serious role as Scotty. But, then again, he may be the comic relief.  I'd go with the latter.

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 6:10 pm

I don't know how it will be. All I can say is there are some unexplained events.

I have looked at trailers before and thought they gave a good over all feel of the movie.... They don't.

Trailer non-scents stung to gather to sell tickets and many times no reflect to movie authentically at all.

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 7:00 pm

im really looking forward to the movie i dont think its going to be a plop because they are already on about a making a sequal for sure. of course everyone will love it or hate it like marmite lol

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 7:04 pm

Maybe you should make this a poll

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 7:09 pm

good idea i would say cant wait to see,not really bothered or death to j j abrams lol

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 7:15 pm

a sequel is already confirmed.

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 11:10 pm

Can't wait 

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 11:23 pm

its completely messing up everything.

so: 1st cpt of enterprise was not kirk. i dont think that spoc lived on earth during his young years.
concerning the ship build in the backround: i thought "sT enterprise" wanted to tell us that the NX enterprise was the first ship?

i dont know where this shall lead to. i think it will be real crap. nemesis was a good end to me. next film had to be a ds9 themed, or voyager themed. not this "okay we cant get any more futuristic, so lets go back as far as possible"

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 11:25 pm

It's screwing with time travel; canon will be used but not prescribed to for everything 

posted on April 2nd, 2009, 11:45 pm

If you watch the preview he assumes command may be a formal captain had not yet bean assigned or Pike was hurt/indisposed or some thing.

posted on April 3rd, 2009, 12:07 am

Isn't it possible we could blame any canon screw-ups on the Temporal Cold War from Enterprise?

posted on April 3rd, 2009, 12:24 am

No, because that was supposed to take place before Kirk etc within the SAME timeline... whereas this movie takes place inside a different timeline. Still, time is dependent on the observer, so what does it really matter 

[Tyler]

posted on April 3rd, 2009, 12:26 am

Last edited by Tyler on April 3rd, 2009, 12:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Temporal cold war. Temporal as in time, time as in happens in multiple timezones, many of which were not shown.

It gives you something to blame, from an in-universe sense (and makes it easier to ignore since you won't be likely to focus on it if you can blame it on something).

posted on April 3rd, 2009, 12:28 am

Ok, think of this movie as a parallel universe then, created when someone screwed up the timeline: budding