Best Star Trek Ship?

posted on October 17th, 2004, 4:10 am

well for starters my previos post. lol the one with the Images and text? From the Cannon magazine. lol two i have a goten this from,

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schemati...leet_ships2.htm

2) Pre-production drawings of the Sovereign class show a saucer separation. In separated mode, the quantum torpedo tube/captain's yacht is connected to the engineering hull. This configuration is also reproduced in the parts of the AMT/Ertl model kit. It is unlikely, however, that the ship is actually separable.

Note the last sentence cant not be sadi to be cannon becouse it was not said by any one in the ST franchise, BUT also note that the model was made to look seperatible. that is cannon.

I would like to see your proof as you ahve not given any. all you say is that there is lack of proof that seperatoin is true...but i have given the proof.

posted on October 17th, 2004, 5:10 am

Theres no proof showing it has separation and all the proof needed to show it cannot separate. Have you ever seen a game where it can separate? I'm guessing no, therefore chances are it can't separate. You seem bent on a hope that is all but impossible. Resistance is futile, canonism will prevail.

[[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP]

posted on October 17th, 2004, 5:38 am

Last edited by [F-I-I]VAdm-MJP on October 17th, 2004, 5:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

you show one thing? i have shown 3. LOL

Have you ever seen a Defander class in game? or the nebula variants? if its in a game or not dose not count souly alone, you must take into account all the arias of the franchise.

posted on October 17th, 2004, 5:40 am

it dose seprate and i know i got one of those star trek magizines and it has the offical drawings btw the drawing abive is offical

posted on October 17th, 2004, 7:43 am

Listen, you havent shown me any definitive proof, and i've shown all the proof required. Only thing from you i've heard about is this magazine, well that apparently isn't good enough. You might as well let this drop because i'm certainly not

[[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP]

posted on October 18th, 2004, 5:56 pm

Last edited by [F-I-I]VAdm-MJP on October 18th, 2004, 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I have showed you the magazine. lol and i ahve given you that site link to. do you even read my posts? lol and still i have not SEEN proof from you. I think tonight i will post a Poll on this, along with my findings, ill put the link here.

PS. the reson i ahve not posted to this is couse the subscription to it stoped some how. lol

posted on October 19th, 2004, 3:25 am

wow

posted on October 19th, 2004, 7:34 am

I actually don't click on others links usually, and when I do rarly look around. Just tell me why you think the Sovern can separate (and make it good because so far all you've given is crap) and show me, because I really think your wrong and I WILL go to the end of the earth to show you i'm right. It's in the job discription.

[lumpybob209]

posted on October 19th, 2004, 11:56 am

Last edited by lumpybob209 on October 19th, 2004, 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

this is the article exactly from Star Trek:Magazine. :cry: why :cry: why did they cancel it :cry:

HIDDEN ABILITY

John also took the trouble to work out exactly how the E's saucer would separate, even though this had never been mentioned in the script. " I just knew that the saucer separation was part of it. I figured that was something that always had to happen, and I wanted to make sure it had been worked out beforehand. So it's already been established where the separation line and the break lines should be.
"I wanted the two parts of the ship to look very indepenant of each other and not as if they had to be together. I drew a version with the saucer off where it looks like kind of a retro dart. I wanted that part of the ship to look very fast but also aggressive."
For all the changes, John says still has many, many traces of Matt Jefferies original design. "There was a lot of stuff I wanted to keep from the old ship. There were two triangles on the saucer, which I found out later were supposedly landing gear, and the big scoop on the back. Even though we had to change the ship, I wanted to show that these things still exist.

posted on October 19th, 2004, 1:17 pm

yes and there is the drowing but i dont wnat to post it here becouse it is too big that is why i linked it. and you still ahve not showed me anything.lol

posted on October 19th, 2004, 5:53 pm

Waiting for this evidence...Don't think you'll find it tho.

posted on October 20th, 2004, 2:06 am

DUDE...can you not read? i ahve given you 3 things of proof...you have given 1, IM whaiting for your proof.

posted on October 20th, 2004, 3:01 am

i typed the entire article about the soverign saucer separating, what don't you belive????

posted on October 20th, 2004, 4:29 am

I posted the bloody images and text of magazine, i dont like it when people dont read my posts, its insaltying to me. i read yours. lol

posted on October 20th, 2004, 4:41 am

I read your posts, how could we be having this convo if I didn't? I said, like I said the first time, that I don't usually click on links. I think you should have been able to convence me easier had the Sovern actually ever had separation.