NEWS! From The New York Times

[ewm90]

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 1:58 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on September 2nd, 2004, 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

News!!!

in the new york times yeter day it sed st mite take 2 seenon off be for starting a new show.

the cast of old and new wont to take a 5 year brake. but upn duss not wont this. the reson whay thay wont the brake st rating are laging and thay think voowers are tierd of the same ideas over and over. so thay think the brake will reinvgrate vowwers.

wein a new show starts thay sed for sher thare will be a new cast with no link to eany uther crowe. but the ever evaprating voorer pool is desterbing.

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 3:09 pm

i dont like the idea of changin the whole crew and stuff... but maybe some things to cerrect the star trek storryline of enterprise would be cool... or they shall make a romulan series ;D

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 3:15 pm

Yeah I'm up for the Romulan series. For the Empire!

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 4:15 pm

well im not kinda romulan fan or trek junk, but i like the romulan culture and their ships pretty much

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 4:17 pm

this new post is about saveing startrek not about detales.

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 4:25 pm

about startrek business ideas

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 4:33 pm

I'm not exactly sure what they should do. It's possible taking a 5 year brake may give Star Trek time to get better but it's also possible in that time paramount might give up on Star Trek. For those who want to read this article and don't have access to the New York times, visit the New York Times website here You need to register with their site, but it's completely free and you can read the article online.

posted on September 2nd, 2004, 4:41 pm

sounds good in the new i read it sed that thay whood not stop makeing movies but just the showe whood be supended. in the meen time thay whood beld exsitents for it with comershals and uther propaganda.