Is The US Judicial System Need To Be Reformed?

posted on January 25th, 2006, 10:01 pm

I think the U.S. court system is seriously in need of reworking.

I know of a case just recently were a man that owned a ranch on the border of Mexico captured some illegal immigrants that were crossing over on his property and in the process of capturing them one of the immigrants got pistol whipped. The man then turned the Immigrants over to boarder patrol. The Immigrants then came back and went before a U.S. court and sued this man for emotional damages and ended up winning the mans ranch as compensation.

I just want to know how the courts thought it was just to let illegal immigrants into a court so they could sue a man that they were trespassing on his land will illegally coming into the country.

There is also the thousands of cases were people suing other people for anything they can blame on some else and end up winning millions of dollars for there own stupidity. And the courts just encourage the people to do worse things because they can get out of taking responsibility for there actions.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 10:28 pm

this happens a lot in the uk, a uk farmer killed thiefs who had repeatedly stolen from his property and when he shot them where taking his property at that time, he killed one and the other got away with a leg wound the farmer was sued and sentenced to life while the teen robber was given a caution. its stupid and I blame the U.S. for this, its your culture that brought the oh i am going to sue you for anything and everythnig over to the rest of the world and it ****** me off. I understand suing people for say accident caused in drink driving, but if it was bad weather and i crashed into you then noi think its wrong


another example my sister and her bf work in the mountains doing outward bounds extreme sports in north wales. a child stopped breathing and his heart stopped (unknowns reasons). my sisters bf performed cpr and saved the child although broke his ribs his parents tried sueing my sisters BF for braking there kids rib when hey saved his life. its only that my sisters BF is bankrupt that it failed.

posted on January 25th, 2006, 10:34 pm

Ya Eufnoc when I was in boy scouts they trained us in cpr but tould us not to use it because we would probly be sued if the person was hurt in the proses

posted on January 25th, 2006, 10:46 pm

heres how to save there life so they can ruin yours!!! but if you don't try and save them then there family sue you for not trying!!!

posted on January 26th, 2006, 12:26 am

well so far as how i under stand how it works is:

a wordin is elected by a state goverment all most all state populations suport abuse in thare perisons. so to make sher the mayer gets elected agin thay hire wardins that wont to abuse inmates.

this meen most forumer inmates that are relested have a very hi-chance of comiting new cimes are not reabilatated do not learn skills to live can fit in with evry one elss.

i dont see this sad sichation chaging eny time soon.

posted on January 26th, 2006, 12:48 am

thas why so many ppl wanna be a lawyer when they growup in the states. cause u can get **** rich by all these stupid cases...

posted on January 26th, 2006, 4:42 pm

i definetly think they need to redo the justis system in the US, it's stupid the way people can sue others for their own stupidity

[ewm90]

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:09 pm

Last edited by ewm90 on January 26th, 2006, 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

i dont have a problom with pepal sowing uther pepal i just have a problom of how evin if the respitent of the law soot is not giltty has to plaiy legal fees.

thares a colt in the usa caled scientology that sows pepal how stand up to it. evin when the cases are thown out the victom of the law soots is brock and must declare bank-rupsy this has let thay kill of Non profits like C.A.N. colt aware-nes net-work.

i think it dus need to be redun but in away wher it still lets the lital guy fite the big guy when abused.

a news up date on C.A.N :

http://skepticfiles.org/can/pagan.htm

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:29 pm

its america, people can sue companies if they don't tell them that putting plastic bags on your head might lead to death

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:37 pm

or putting pets in the microwave could kill them. or eating food full of fat will make them fat.

[[TD]Roach]

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:44 pm

Last edited by [TD]Roach on January 26th, 2006, 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

*looks at his bucket of lard while he is eating it* You are right eufnoc! no warning. **** those lard makers!!!! I am going to sue their a.s.s. off

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:44 pm

companys can aford it. i am not going to fell sorry for coprations that have a nuff munny to fill a stadom with on stocks alone. dering clinton i think the normal CEO erned some thing like 5x times what the midal class made in a year now its bloted to like 35 times.

compansy can aford it. i am more woryed about the evry day consumer how has to paiy for the rich corprations CEOs.

i think at some pont we can paiy atichon to coprations being abused by conumers as soon as we make shere the consermers are pretected ferst.

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:49 pm

Companies can afford it? what kind of screwed world do you live in? who wants to give money to some guy that ate too much hamburgers because he though he wa healthy?. besides those law suits aren't good for business and for the economy. so that is absolute b.u.l.l.s.h.i.t. beside they just go raise the price of their produced good to get their money back.

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:52 pm

if a perons from the midal class gets sowed he derclares banrupsy wich now meens under us law thanks to bush you must loos ever thing you own be for geting help from the goverment!!!

if a copration gets showed thay loss a litalbit of munny and than its bissness as ushwal.

posted on January 26th, 2006, 5:59 pm

little bit? prices goes as high as hunderds of millions. you can start new project with that in a business. and a single person can't state bankrupcy unless he ha a business.

and isn't it with bankrupcy that you already are in in dept? otherwise you can't claim it. seems logical to me that law. and besides then you should have placed the money that you left over from the business onto someone else his or hers name in the family who isn't in the business. then you have the money left.

but anyway you can only state bankrupcy when you are out of cash anyway. unless you want fraud