A ship from the past? Or Future?

posted on December 9th, 2009, 6:51 pm

If there is no reason you haven't done a lot of listening (or reading)

BTW, the Miranda is not buildable.

How would you know there is no reason? did you bother to ask... no.. and you cant listen on the forum so stop trying to be smart.

clearly i meant the Miranda-II class.

posted on December 9th, 2009, 7:13 pm

How would you know there is no reason? did you bother to ask... no.. and you cant listen on the forum so stop trying to be smart.

clearly i meant the Miranda-II class.

  Lol Eraldo I'd really stop making these aggressive posts.  "Stop trying to be smart" ...
 
  How would he know there is no reason?  He's saying there IS a reason and that if you had "listened" to other people's requests (my own included) for having a buildable Miranda you'd know.

  Yeah we knew you were talking about the Miranda II, but everyone ELSE is talking about the Miranda-I, so maybe you're not the only person in the world his comment refers to.

  Be a grown-up 

posted on December 9th, 2009, 7:41 pm

How would you know there is no reason? did you bother to ask... no.. and you cant listen on the forum so stop trying to be smart.

clearly i meant the Miranda-II class.

In fact I not only bothered to ask, I wrote it down so that everyone can read it . And yes, it is the official reason. Miranda will not be buildable outside of mixed tech.

posted on December 20th, 2009, 2:24 am

Not to be a dunce douche but... isn't the "Proxima" class actually the "Yorktown" class?

[imge]http://i141.photobucket.com/albums/r71/JRdinosaur/fed1.jpg[/img]

I could have sworn that's what the Yorktown looked like back in TOS...

posted on December 20th, 2009, 2:55 am

Fixed.

posted on December 20th, 2009, 10:48 am

What on this thing is similar to the Proxima?  o.O
The shape of the nacelles and the old starfleet-insignia, yes, but the Proxima has got two engineering hulls, four nacelles and a different saucer.