The Excelsior II Class, Which version?
Which race do you like most? What do you like - what you don't like? Discuss it here.

Question: Okay, the Excelsior II class looks great and all, but the Nacelles to me look incorrect. Which version would you rather have?

Total votes: 38
Version A (The one currently in the game)22 votes (58%)
Version B (The other version shown at 1st post)7 votes (18%)
Either is good for me.2 votes (5%)
Niether, I don't like either version.5 votes (13%)
I want to propose my own variant (please post an image)0 votes (0%)
Why not have both? (Please specify how)2 votes (5%)
1, 2
Baleful
User avatar
Donator
336 posts
posted on September 1st, 2009, 9:53 pm
i've noticed...

while closely looking that the different Federation ships in the game,  while they all have "blue" nacells,  they are not the same SHADE of blue.  some arnt even blue at all.

but again, perhapse i'm too critical of details like that.
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on September 1st, 2009, 10:25 pm
Baleful wrote:some arnt even blue at all.

You mean like the Norway?
Actium
User avatar
posted on September 13th, 2009, 11:17 am
i dont like classes with a " II " in there name ... i like more creative stuff or names  :thumbsup:
Tyler
User avatar
10075 posts
posted on September 13th, 2009, 12:12 pm
The 'II' is there for a reason, they are a MkII of the ships. A direct replacement, but not a refit. A completly new Class with no cinnection to the original would have a new name.
Rhaz
User avatar
907 posts
posted on September 14th, 2009, 7:06 am
'Keep in mind that the Excelsior II is not a refit.'

QFT on Dominus Noctis.

I think people assume too frequently that the Excelsior II is just a comprehensive refit (akin to the Lakota class). It is a whole new class of star-ship and the name and similar shape are just there to pay homage to the great Excelsior class.
1, 2
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests