Modding Question

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 1:22 pm

MaP has said repededly that his work will continue any way. ARE YOU BLIND?

FO has shared material in the past, but MaP just came on to the forum and start blasting the mod and the team instead of talking to them via PM or aim about it.

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 1:50 pm

cts. FYI, and if you had read one of my past threads the romulan models that I used may have been from FO, but were taken from Project Armada (which still hasnt' been removed from SFC3files.com). Also for the record I am in the process of replacing said models, the statement I made was with regards to materials which, if you check yourself then you'll find I'm quite right.

Aside from that and not that its any of yours or anyone elses (but myself and the FO team members) buisiness, I would appreciate other members to not jump to conclusion in future.

What it seems certain people don't realise, is that those romulan stations constitute 1/6 of the entire FO project, so its more understandable that they would request their removal.

As for my own project. It'll continue. Although it is on temporary hold for now, whilst I build some other models.

Optec. When and if your online give me a yell if you see me. Theres something I'd like to discuss with you.

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 2:25 pm

dude if you don't want anyone elses comments why dont you send them a pm instead of posting said buisiness on the forums
in other words stop complaining man it's getting real old real fast

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 2:49 pm

So is people dredging up facts which don't concern them.

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 3:41 pm

This is a forum dedicated to the people that like FO, if someone posted here it means that they want to show those people something or discuss something. IF this is non of our buisiness than as Ryan said, dont post but reach FO team via email, pm, msn messenger,.....

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 3:56 pm

i agree, and also moose, i disagree with you, why should the fo team have to freely give there models away which they have spent long and hard making, they also started up from the begining with no knowlodge but they built on it, it would be like foricing shakespere to shear his plays with someone else as they where new to making plays and having to shear the glory, its not right.

MAP: don't go insluting members they have a right to comment, if they misunderstood somthing don't have a go, and posting somthing for optecs eyes only is a little stupid when we have a pm thing, its like telling everyone not to look, its going to get people to look, so basicly attention seeking. on a side note i liked the review you did on fleetops a few years back.

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 6:38 pm

That was the fun MaP, now we have the evil vengful like MaP.

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 9:54 pm

Vengeful? He's just said he understands their decision

Not using PM? I believe people having a direct go at him in these forums should be done pm, don't you?

Last I heard this matter was solved and the thread locked, but some of your replies simply dredge it back up despite Optec's wishes, Can you not just leave well enough alone??

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 10:37 pm

If people misunderstand something then they should re-read the posting until its understood.

As for being vengful. If that really was the case, would I really have bothered posting the statement regarding the models in the first place knowing the resulting request by Optec for me to remove them?? Would I have also agreed to it?? If I was THAT vengeful then I would have gone straight ahead and continued to use them. Seems one or two of you are missing that point and instead jumping to conclusions and taking sides.

Also its been well known that project members (and I'm not just talking about the FO team either), usually don't bother responding to direct questioning via any kind of personal contact (something which has been well documented). Therefore the most direct method is via their forum (and I could have done this on AFC forum instead, but do any of you see my posting there?? I think not as you all probably know what would happen on that forum.......)

Anyway, before anyone else bitches at me for this or earlier postings, then perhaps you'll take note that while each and every person continues to bring this topic back up I'll continue to defend myself as I see fit, until its closed or I'm banned (and if I am banned then perhaps the case will be closed, perhaps it won't. We'll just have to see).

Oh and as a point of reference. Eufnoc. With regards to the "glowing" review I did. I've not done one since because Beta 2 simply won't run on my pc (see my thread in the technical stuff part of the forum), and no, it isn't my hardware thats at fault, or the installation of the game as all seems to install well. Its just running the game thats the problem.

[Eufnoc]

posted on May 22nd, 2005, 10:37 pm

Last edited by Eufnoc on May 22nd, 2005, 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

misunderstanding post delelted.

posted on May 23rd, 2005, 2:08 pm

MaP i personally wasn't bitching at you :angel: just suggesting that if you have personal buisseness that you use the pm service then nobody would any the wiser to it (makes sense to me)

you say you will continue to defend yourself as you see fit, well fair enough i guess but your just giving everyone more incentive to add their 2 pennies.

sorry to uk9999 but i urge optec, doca cola or detektor to close this thread and end this discussion.

there no need for anyone to defend nor attack anyone agreed?

that was a hypothetical question, no need to answer ^_^

posted on May 23rd, 2005, 4:27 pm

Agreed... oh damn