Missing For The Klingons

Post ideas and suggestions on new features or improvements here.

Question: ? ¿ ? ¿ ? ¿ ?

Total votes: 19
Of Core - thay need alot more ships1 votes (5%)
Yes - thay need a huge ship Class7 votes (37%)
Yes - thay need a new pawerfull Class5 votes (26%)
Maby - unsher or i dont understand2 votes (11%)
No - thare ships work well4 votes (21%)
No - no thay have to meny as is0 votes (0%)
Heck No - thay need less ships0 votes (0%)
1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
posted on December 19th, 2005, 4:30 pm
lol not to be picky Ryan but a ship half the size of the Akira with the same mass would be more dense and hence have an advantage in battle as more dense armor ---> stronger armor. but yeah lol mass is a pointless point for comparison because apart from that it doesn't have any meaning in space. And when your talking about gravity you cant really say it = 1 the weight of a 60kg person on earth would actually be closer to 600N as gravity on earth is 9.81..... or more or less 10.

Yeah this is pointless so i'll stop now how did this start anyway? :P
posted on December 19th, 2005, 4:34 pm
people wanted to know something about what was missing for klingns i think- something about big klingon ship
posted on December 19th, 2005, 4:38 pm
Yeah people wer comparing the vorcha to akira, I think your better off comparing roles and also maybe engine size (as the power output of the engine has a bearing of what shields and such other things the ship can take) than mass lol.
posted on December 19th, 2005, 4:39 pm
someone go look at the tech manual or something lol
posted on December 19th, 2005, 5:01 pm
Ok its possible (but this is off a random website so someone should look it up) that the akira has a warpcore output of 119,970 AmbiWatts
and the vorcha : 86,731 TeraWatts

As you can see the Akira can produce a vast amount more of raw power however I could be wrong so somone should check.

this is from: Here and Here

so not exactly a cannon source ^_^
posted on December 19th, 2005, 5:02 pm
OK I HAVE HUGE PROB do you need cd to play fleetops? because thats what my comp says
posted on December 19th, 2005, 6:04 pm
i think so. actually, i'm pretty sure ya do.
posted on December 19th, 2005, 7:13 pm
weight isn't gravity but is affected by gravity.

i know how they managed to do the weight but actually if you think about it is stupid to put a weight for a starship anyway. you have to know how much it weighs or atleast the equipment on a planet. but every planet has it's own gravatational force so not everything weighs the same and every planet, see venus, the moon and earth


but in my mind i found it funny people trying to weigh something in space. just don't take fictional facts to serious
posted on December 19th, 2005, 7:34 pm
Like I already said Roach, it would be better to measure things by power output, seems to make more sense.
posted on December 19th, 2005, 8:14 pm
well look ok lets get back on topic people wanted a larger klingon vessel

my oppinion is they are fine maybe give the

vorcha a pulse disruptor as seen in TNG and DS9 it was a very powerful weapon give it something like 15 dammage every 9 seconds

that would be as much as i would want oh and give the negvar a cloak cause it does have one we have seen it cloak on tv

thats the only change i could really want
posted on December 19th, 2005, 9:52 pm
it already has 14 damage phasers wich are stongest in game i think
1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests