Ideas With Lava

[warp]

posted on November 19th, 2006, 9:41 pm

Last edited by warp on November 19th, 2006, 9:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

We have now by object:
F1: Tileset: Asteroide: Resources
F2: Tileset: Asteroide: P1
F3: Tileset: Asteroide: P2
F4: Tileset: Ice: Resources
F5: Tileset: Ice: P1
F6: Tileset: Ice: P2
F7...
F8...
F9...
F10...

I have found a new idea.
We have now Asteroide and ice tileset.
I had thought tileset with lava.
Then we have:

Lava resources,
Small en large lava asteroid(e)
Small lava field
Lava dust field

But then we have still a problem with the "F #".

the solution is:
F1: Tileset: Asteroide
F2: Tileset: Ice
F3: Tileset: Lava
F4
.
..
...

click on F1: Asteroide
F1: Tileset: Asteroide: Resources
F2: Tileset: Asteroide: P1
F3: Tileset: Asteroide: P2

click on F2: Ice
F1: Tileset: Ice: Resources
F2: Tileset: Ice: P1
F3: Tileset: Ice: P2

click on F3: Lava
F1: Tileset: Lava: Resources
F2: Tileset: Lava: P1
F3: Tileset: Lava: P2

I think that, of that lava possible it is
what thinks you there of??

posted on November 19th, 2006, 9:52 pm

sounds fine to me

posted on November 20th, 2006, 7:15 pm

Lava... in space???

posted on November 20th, 2006, 7:42 pm

Lava in space is impossible.

posted on November 20th, 2006, 8:19 pm

Lava in space is impossible.

why would that be so is sound and such, bu you know it's star trek.

posted on November 20th, 2006, 9:12 pm

Lava in space is impossible.

I beg to difer if lava can exist under watter it can in space. But lava needs a sores to origrinatt from astroids are much to small evin comits are to small you will need a moon or planet to generate lava.

posted on November 21st, 2006, 1:13 pm

it's unrealistic if it doesn't originate from a planet or a large meteor, otherwise it's just too damn cold to stay a liquid.

posted on November 21st, 2006, 6:44 pm

the space is (mystery)= everything is possible
but tis is Star Trek!
here is everything possibly and he who weet exist it, however,

in voy: there exist a water planet!

But lava needs a sores to origrinatt from astroids are much to small evin comits are to small you will need a moon or planet to generate lava.

mean you with that is : a moon, planet , small comits that there in lava on is??
or not? can you give a littel more info.

posted on November 21st, 2006, 6:54 pm

it's unrealistic if it doesn't originate from a planet or a large meteor, otherwise it's just too damn cold to stay a liquid.

Meteors areway to small to make magma you need exstreen heat an presher with a meteor of eny size cant make. small moons may evin be two small.

A meteor duss not have the whate to crate the frition and presher needed to make magma so thare for you can not get lava from tham.

Lova is so hot it could servive in spase. If lova can stay in a sotra liquid state at the bodom of the sea whare thare is lital to no sun lite it can in space for a short time.

posted on November 21st, 2006, 10:20 pm

it's unrealistic if it doesn't originate from a planet or a large meteor, otherwise it's just too damn cold to stay a liquid.

100% correct

posted on November 21st, 2006, 10:32 pm

100% correct

in response it it star trek

posted on November 24th, 2006, 2:00 am

I just think it'd look pretty cool. Maybe not lava, but volcanic-like. Like that moon of Jupiter.

[eoraptor]

posted on November 27th, 2006, 8:17 am

Last edited by eoraptor on November 27th, 2006, 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

why would that be so is sound and such, bu you know it's star trek.

Have to agree with this post. if these games were going for realism, they'd all bee like "2001; a Space Odessy" Just a lot of music because there is no sound in space unless you're in direct physical contact with the thing making the sound. I think a Lava tile set would round out the tile set effects quite nicely.

Lava-Rocks-Ice...

If you want to not call it lava/fire, per say, call it an orangish plasma stream or something. I'd also like to see the return of the black hole to the tileset, disable someone's engines and see them shredded by the tidal forces of a singularity

posted on November 27th, 2006, 3:02 pm

Now you hear the ubers argument ever:

It's not canon!

Ok...next one..thx...

posted on November 27th, 2006, 3:08 pm

My opinion: It would just be wierd. Cool looking, mabye, but wierd none the less. I mean, how can you explain liquid rock just floating around in space?! You don't have to have taken chemistry to see that it just wouldn't work because the rock would solidify very quickly.