Ideas For Ds9

posted on October 14th, 2004, 12:17 am

Last edited by ewm90 on October 14th, 2004, 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

1) make it move but realy slowly like hafe a inch every 3sec.

2) make it abul to bild definat class ships and (uther ships depinding on wat race runs it = run-abouts for feds. a borg can bild new kinda borg ship week. kinons get the d7. romulans get the old sawnt class from kerks time. domein get a new ship. if its posabul.)

3) give it lots of wepind banks that fier difrant wepinds depinding on what race controles it.

4) can repare ships

Cmd.Paul

Donator

387 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 10:20 am

i'd say DS9 is a nutral station or a station in the fed campaign

Jarod

321 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 3:07 pm

i completely agree with cmdr. Paul

[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP

posted on October 14th, 2004, 3:34 pm

Last edited by [F-I-I]VAdm-MJP on October 14th, 2004, 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

that or somthing you can take (like StarFleet HQ in some A2 multyplayer maps) that makes the Bagorian impulse shuttle. (from the map..think its defender) or makes a new/old Cardas ship. i say it dosnt move.....oh and wodnt you be able to have mutible ones? i mean like was DS9 the only station with that configation?

Cmd.Paul

Donator

387 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 4:18 pm

ds9 is a cardassian starbase, it makes no sence to let the feds build one, i mean other than it looks nice it is no fun because then all races should be able to have something like that,

ds9 should be a nutral station or a station for the feds in a campaign mission, nothing more nothing less, just like defiant with cloak, it's one ship, ds9 is one station and not even a fed design

Atlantis

872 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 6:20 pm

Ds9 didn't build the Defiant anyway. The mirror universe one did, i think, but not the 'real' one....

[TD]Roach

1138 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 6:30 pm

i find the DS9 station eyecandy but not a very good station. the defences are aren't that great and those rings are easily destroyed. the normal fed bases are more compact and those better shielding efficiency in my eyes

Lt.Cmdr Worf

311 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 8:11 pm

DS9's defenses were pretty impressive...i mean something like 63 phaser arrays and 63 torpedo launchers??? Sounds deadly if you ask me... I mean the station did destroy an impressive amount of Klingon ships..as well as defending itself well against the Dominion before Starfleet had to relinquish it. But I agree..the feds shouldn't be able to build it.

It should be available only as a map object and only for a Fed campaign mission.. like you have to defend DS9 from the Dominion/Cardassian fleet...like create a huge map that has a wormhole... one half the map is the Gamma Quadrant and the other half is the Alpha Quadrant..and the only way to get from the G Quad to the A Quad would be the wormhole..then another part of the map on the A Quad side would have a Dominion base near a planet like Cardassia Prime and Dominion ships come from there as well...and maybe a normal Fed base like Starbase 375 where you begin the mission and have to get to DS9 before the Dominion does. Whomever gets to DS9 first would have a decisive tactical advantage in that the station could destroy any ships coming out of the wormhole... but not put the station too close to the worm hole but close enough that the ship comes into extreme weapons/sensor range.

Cmd.Paul

Donator

387 posts

posted on October 14th, 2004, 8:30 pm

something like that, i mean it's not that i dislike ds9 it's just not a fed buildable station

[F-I-I]VAdm-MJP

posted on October 14th, 2004, 8:48 pm

i agree, as i said before. but for multyplayer maps i think that they should be able to build things. lol i already explaned it in my last post, but a typo my have mis led you. have to fix that.

MartinCrull

128 posts

posted on October 19th, 2004, 4:28 pm

I like having it be both findable on the map, and also reinforceable.

Lumpybob