vor'cha

[tom]

posted on February 21st, 2009, 4:06 pm

Last edited by tom on February 21st, 2009, 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

after the patch i think that vor'cha cost should be reconsidered. it's cost is almost the same as luspet and negh'var.
before one could argue that disabling the ship for 16 sec was worth the cost of the vor'cha but with the special ability nerf it's become a little overpriced imo.
i would appreciate if someone from FO team could take a look at the vor'cha.

posted on February 21st, 2009, 5:25 pm

just took a look at it and it seems to be fine. its a light battleship and as such its expensive. its weapons are quite powerful, too

[tom]

posted on February 21st, 2009, 7:49 pm

Last edited by tom on February 21st, 2009, 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

thx optec. i just feel that it was more powerful b4. it's still cheaper then those of the romulans though

posted on February 21st, 2009, 9:02 pm

A good wing of Vor'cha can still turn alot of attacks into space dust without even bothering with any other ship classes.  That makes their price very reasonable to me.  Certainly not cheap, really, but simple and very effective.  The way real Klingons like it.

posted on February 21st, 2009, 11:31 pm

a good wing of k'vorts can do that too but that's not the point.
the thing is if i have to decide between vor'cha and luspet, the luspet is going to hunt today while the vor'cha can howl at the moon about the days it was in service in my fleet. the only thing i would even bother myself with vor'cha is it's speed but that's a v limited usage.
what i'm saying is that the path has turned my main late-game cruiser into a misclick while i'm putting luspets for production.