Atlantis
Member
 Offline
Posts: 277
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2004, 12:08:52 AM » |
|
Ahh nice. The Galaxy-X's was that cool chock-off Phaser Cannon  THAT was a weapon |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I need to know if we did serious harm to this life form."
"Let's see. You ran your ship through it, fired phasers at it, and blew a hole in it with a photon torpedo. I'd say it's a pretty good chance..."
|
|
|
cts006
Member
Offline
Posts: 1956
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 17, 2004, 04:18:03 AM » |
|
this ship is 1000 times better than any models, and original designes for teh federation yet. Keep up the good work, the discovery as a warp in would be cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2004, 12:52:16 PM » |
|
Is that Discovery class going to be put in? Probably going to be a super ship with both kinds of Torpedos.
W00T 500 posts, in your face Eufnoc!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 17, 2004, 12:53:29 PM by TMP Rules »
|
Logged
|
  *^* |
|
|
Lt.Cdr.White
Member
Offline
Posts: 752
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2004, 03:12:50 PM » |
|
Just mentioned the Discovery because of the "coolness device". Didn't want to get all the attention.  But however, it's no way a supership. Actually it's merely between Sabre and Intrepid class, but with different weapon arrangement: http://www.treknology.org/starships1.htm |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Trust your feelings! |
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2004, 06:00:48 PM » |
|
Did you make it? You seem to mention it every 5 posts, just wondering if you were trying to get it put in. I wouldn't mind destroying CTSs fleets with it  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
Lt.Cdr.White
Member
Offline
Posts: 752
|
|
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2004, 07:08:42 PM » |
|
http://forum.fleetops.net/index.php?showtopic=616Remember? Everything already discussed. However, I really like the Avalon class. Looks like an Intrepid done with Sovereign class technology. And I mentioned the Discovery only because it has the detail just as the Galaxy-X, the Phalanx, the Avalon and partly the Sovereign. It's simply that the idea seems to become very common.  That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Trust your feelings! |
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2004, 10:59:18 PM » |
|
To make unholy super-ugly kitbash? Yeah that seems very common.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
cts006
Member
Offline
Posts: 1956
|
|
« Reply #22 on: April 18, 2004, 10:22:34 PM » |
|
Did u just say the avalon was ugly?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #23 on: April 18, 2004, 10:26:45 PM » |
|
Actually I was refering to kitbashes in general.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
cts006
Member
Offline
Posts: 1956
|
|
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2004, 08:42:48 PM » |
|
This doesnt look like a kitbash.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Overlord/Zeich
Staff
Offline
Posts: 185
Tarken
|
|
« Reply #25 on: April 19, 2004, 10:44:55 PM » |
|
The Alavon doesn't look like a kitbash to me. In general kitbashes are usually pretty bad. I like both the Discovery and the Alavon. To me the Alavon looks like an Achilles class with a bit of Galaxy X to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Enter Daybreak
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #26 on: April 19, 2004, 10:49:30 PM » |
|
Usually kitbashes are ugly. Take the Griffin class for example, UGLY. Some non-trek kitbashes are even uglier.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
cts006
Member
Offline
Posts: 1956
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 20, 2004, 01:43:15 AM » |
|
griffen class is a cool romi design.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PREATOR DEFIANT
Member
Offline
Posts: 4518
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 20, 2004, 02:06:06 AM » |
|
No, the Federation Griffen class.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
*^* |
|
|
cts006
Member
Offline
Posts: 1956
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 23, 2004, 02:08:32 AM » |
|
Okay...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
