Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Generalarrow Star Trekarrow !REAL! Star Trek XI trailer out!!!!

May 17, 2008, 06:19:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: !REAL! Star Trek XI trailer out!!!!  (Read 3450 times)
Triarii
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #30 on: January 26, 2008, 08:03:40 AM »

Quote
Hmmm, I was told that AvP 2 was actually good... compared to the first AvP.

Well, according to Wikipedia (the flim is actually called Aliens vs Predator 2: Requiem, BTW)...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliens_vs._Predator:_Requiem

Whilst it did apparantly make a substantial profit at the box office, it was absolutely smashed by the critics (16% on Rotten Tomatoes). The original was smashed as well (22% on Rotten Tomatoes)...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_vs._Predator_%28film%29
Logged
Dr. Lazarus
Schrodinger's Sidekick
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1091



« Reply #31 on: January 27, 2008, 01:43:40 AM »

Someone used their Photoshop skills to create an image where you can see a bit more:

http://screenrant.com/images/enterprise-detail.html
Logged

Dominus_Noctis
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #32 on: January 27, 2008, 01:58:32 AM »

The hull looks extremely thin 
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Dr. Lazarus
Schrodinger's Sidekick
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1091



« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2008, 02:06:02 AM »

I'm thinkin' it's made of some advanced 23rd centrury material that can handle a photon torpedo or two. Actually wait... generally a torpedo will go right through the ship if the shields are down. But, hey! I'm sure it's a nice engineering composite material or something! 

And remember, they can make "transparent" aluminium in the 23rd century which they couldn't make in the 1980s but which we... sort of, figured out how to do by late 2007. 
Logged

Triarii
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2008, 05:57:23 AM »

Well actually, in Star Trek, starship hulls have never been really thick, but yea, the Enterprise's outer hull in this looks way thinner than usual...

Heh, the Enterprise's bussard collectors look like jet turbines... LOL
Logged
Dominus_Noctis
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #35 on: January 27, 2008, 07:20:04 AM »

Exactly what I was thinking! 
What's this real transparent aluminum you are thinking of?
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Triarii
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #36 on: January 27, 2008, 07:55:51 AM »

Quote
And remember, they can make "transparent" aluminium in the 23rd century which they couldn't make in the 1980s but which we... sort of, figured out how to do by late 2007

Well the hulls of ships in Star Trek are made out of things like tritanium and duranium... Transparent aluminium is just what the windows are made out of...

Besides, even in Archer's time, photonic torpedoes could produce a blast of at least 20 megatons... by Voyager's time, this had risen to at least 200 megatons (meaning it wouldn't be too much of a stretch for the 1701 Enterprise's photons to be able to put out 80-100 megatons)... you'd be pretty hard-pressed to resist a blast that powerful with any material (a Shadow warship in Babylon Five was destroyed when it absorbed the equivalent of about 60 megatons when it was caught in the explosion radius of a 500 megaton nuclear device)...

ST-v-SW.Net :: Overview

ST-v-SW.Net ::  Rise[VOY] and Torpedo Firepower

Shadow Warships
Logged
Dr. Lazarus
Schrodinger's Sidekick
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1091



« Reply #37 on: January 27, 2008, 12:34:51 PM »

There are some great pics on that site Triarii, and a lot of useful info too.

The transparent aluminium I was referring to Dom, well, it isn't aluminium but it's as strong as steel. Actually, err, it depends which discovery you're talking about:

http://www.rense.com/general20/transparentalum.htm

http://www.physorg.com/news110727530.html

We always overestimate short term technology (5-10 years), but greatly underestimate long term technology (20 years plus), which is why by the 23rd century most of our abilities will far surpass the Star Trek universe. Hell, we even have the vibrant field of quantum information technology which could provide primitive transporter technology by the end of the 21st century, and this could be an underestimation of the kind someone in 1908 might have made about 1998. And because our technology is accelerating, the definitions of "short" and "long" term I mentioned become compressed with time. Ok speech over!!  Cheesy
Logged

Triarii
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #38 on: January 28, 2008, 01:02:07 AM »

Yea... I mean, I don't think anyone in 1907 (or even 1957) could possibly have predicted the kinds of technology we have today... and new stuff is cropping up every day now...
Logged
Dominus_Noctis
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #39 on: January 28, 2008, 05:16:09 AM »

Ah cool! I know about the second type of super-strong material, but I hadn't heard of the first 
Can't wait for quantum computers  Azn
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Dr. Lazarus
Schrodinger's Sidekick
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1091



« Reply #40 on: January 28, 2008, 02:22:29 PM »

20-ish years for quantum computers, it's still in the "lab" stage where there are technical hurdles to be surmounted (like that ever stopped anyone). Well within our lifetime though!! And change things they will. All the most important problems in physics are quantum mechanical systems, and therefore can be simulated properly only on a QC. Classical computers will seem like neat toys to our children.
Logged

auxilio ab alto
Hey! It's Me!
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 72


The youth of the coming generation, God is moving


« Reply #41 on: January 28, 2008, 03:35:31 PM »

Now, which type of quantum computers were u guys thinking of? I've heard several different ideas for them, and I don't know which one is "true" or if there is a "true" QC. By true, I don't mean... not real... but I mean the computers which will actually be quantum computers, or if there are different types.
Logged

The youth of the coming generation, God is moving with us.
Dr. Lazarus
Schrodinger's Sidekick
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1091



« Reply #42 on: January 28, 2008, 04:14:18 PM »

Not the one by a company called "D-wave systems", which can only be a fraud at this stage, and the work was not even reviewed by experts, so is best viewed with great suspicion.

The only real (but primitive) quantum computers exist in research laboratories, where they are finding ways to increase the numbers of interacting "qubits" (quantum bits). These computing devices have even executed some calculations, and there are a number of different approaches, including photonic designs, diamonds and even some silicon versions. Some also make use the phenomenon of magnetic resonance, which is the basis for NMR and MRI scanners. Electrons can also be used as qubits, since they exhibit the property of spin, not spin in the classical sense (spinning top), but quantised spin.

I go with the nutty professors rather than the businessmen to be honest. D-wave never even bothered to explain to us what type of QC they made, or how it works, or what results they achieved, etc etc. As with anything, I'd believe if shown the evidence. In the mean time it's quite exciting to watch our classical computers increase in power exponentially according to Moore's law while we wait for QCs.  Cheesy
Logged

Dominus_Noctis
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1594


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #43 on: January 28, 2008, 09:49:54 PM »

Unfortunately Moor's Law will hit a wall .... eventually.  But then again, so will QC's and all the other fancy technological devices humanity comes up with 
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
RedShirt
Per Philosophia, Clarus. Per Clarus, Veritas.
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2686


En Veritas, Voluntas.


« Reply #44 on: January 28, 2008, 10:10:45 PM »

Is that "wall" defined as the time when all our creations rise up against us? 
Logged

"Both you beavers will prevent you from reaching a conclusions."
~ Ewm, warning of dangerous BEAVERS
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com