Menu Content/Inhalt
Home arrow Forum arrow Fleet Operationsarrow Generalarrow Why the Canaveral and not the Nova?

September 07, 2008, 04:01:21 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Why the Canaveral and not the Nova?  (Read 1309 times)
Dominus_Noctis
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1888


'Tis braver to live than to die.
« Reply #15 on: January 20, 2008, 08:05:01 PM »
Ah, of course. Ebay = universal answer  LOL
It is a little expensive for such an old game though 
Logged
I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Mortographer
Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 202
« Reply #16 on: January 20, 2008, 08:21:13 PM »
Huh?Huh??
I got 2 bucks for returning armada 1 to gamespot-evil bastards! (it was a second copy, but still!!)
Logged

"As if you could kill time without injuring eternity." -Thoreau
Pages: 1 [2]
  Send this topic  |  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.3 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com