|
|
Dominus_Noctis
 Offline
Posts: 1985
'Tis braver to live than to die.
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2008, 08:08:57 PM » |
|
What's the story behind it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
|
|
|
Blade
Offline
Posts: 301
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2008, 08:32:00 PM » |
|
not 100% its an experimental battleship using slipstream and a specifically designed deflector based weapon
EDIT::
there was a plan for a cloaking device(stealth feild) but then thought it was not feddy enuf
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 12, 2008, 08:44:43 PM by Blade »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dominus_Noctis
Offline
Posts: 1985
'Tis braver to live than to die.
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2008, 09:16:13 PM » |
|
Slipstream eh? Is that even Startrek tech?  ...or is that Dylan Hunt's ship  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
|
|
|
Blade
Offline
Posts: 301
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2008, 09:21:23 PM » |
|
it was mentioned at least three times in voyager the dauntless and the silverblood voyager and wen voyager crashed on an ice planet due to a problem
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dominus_Noctis
Offline
Posts: 1985
'Tis braver to live than to die.
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 02:28:22 AM » |
|
Oh yeah, Quantum Slipstream Drive! Oops, I guess my mind was just filled with too many sci-fi technology things recently  . The ship kind of reminds me of the constellation class, with its four nacelles. That oval thing that holds the engines together kind of looks a little strange though with those warp engines. Is this your own creation? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
|
|
|
Triarii
Offline
Posts: 172
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 03:54:18 AM » |
|
Yeesh! I hate it! It's just a Sovereign with ugly nacells stuck to it...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
auxilio ab alto
Hey! It's Me!
Offline
Posts: 151
The youth of the coming generation, God is moving
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2008, 04:35:50 AM » |
|
Wow, gotta love the I care language, lol. Anyways. I think yur ship looks neat. For some reaon, I just dodn't see it being in FO, of course, I'm not a mod or anything. I do commend you, though, for your creation of the sihp. You've gotta be creative to create a ship like that. I just don't think I see it being in FO. Course, I'm not the final say...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The youth of the coming generation, God is moving in us.  |
|
|
Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss
Offline
Posts: 1908
There is no spoon
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2008, 10:50:59 AM » |
|
i sppose this could be ok if and i stress if, it is given a makeover and new name  i say a makeover because just about all kitbashes come under heavy scrutiny (even FO's own Descent). a new name is also a must to make it fit because the feds simply wouldn't call one of their ships "assassin", cause to much political rambling (ewm would have a field day with that lol). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
|
|
|
Triarii
Offline
Posts: 172
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2008, 03:27:26 PM » |
|
I personally don't mind kitbashes (I like the Centuar type from DS9), unless they're really blatant, like the Yegar type, also from DS9, or, in this case, the so-called 'Assasin class'...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dominus_Noctis
Offline
Posts: 1985
'Tis braver to live than to die.
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2008, 06:58:44 PM » |
|
It does seem a bit un-fedish to me. I don't think Starfleet would care to name any of their classes of starships in that way: it's too warlike  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
|
|
|
Section32
trekfriends
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2008, 08:11:18 PM » |
|
pls include Miranda or Centauer Class in the Mod and not any unknown Ships. First pls include more Famous Fed ships and than "other" Ships |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Blade
Offline
Posts: 301
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2008, 09:52:15 PM » |
|
i was just giving them the ship because my laptop has decided to not allow milkshape 2 work anymore so my mod has stopped
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Triarii
Offline
Posts: 172
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 14, 2008, 04:03:56 AM » |
|
Actually, Section32, the Miranda class is going to appear in the final release of V 3.0 in the form of the Miranda-II, a specail ship you can construct if you capture Dominion technology (i.e. a construction ship).
Speaking of which, when you capture a Dominion worker unit, can it still change modes? Could a Dominion player theoretically save himself from having his technology captured by switching a worker that is being boarded into mining mode?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Optec
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 14, 2008, 10:52:48 AM » |
|
yep, a boarded constructor can still switch modes
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Forum 