Menu Content/Inhalt

December 02, 2008, 02:49:17 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Overview   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Send this topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: why no planets?  (Read 8419 times)
Meredith
Donator

Offline Offline

Posts: 298


^Seraphim^


WWW
« on: November 25, 2007, 05:16:53 AM »

well we have planets but they should be usable like in A2 I was just asking why (oh and I put this here because it is more of a question)
Logged


Dominus_Noctis

Offline Offline

Posts: 1983


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2007, 08:16:51 AM »

Were you thinking of adding crew back with this idea... or just sort of like glorified battle stations (easier to control territory... or perhaps certain supply, mining benefits...)
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Meredith
Donator

Offline Offline

Posts: 298


^Seraphim^


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2007, 08:30:56 AM »

Were you thinking of adding crew back with this idea... or just sort of like glorified battle stations (easier to control territory... or perhaps certain supply, mining benefits...)

yes all of the above. like if you build a turret around a planet it has stronger shields and builds faster recharges faster ect give some benefits for building something around a planet but you only get it if it is colonized and supply and mining would be cool maby not have the planet build ships but have addons (using the pod thing made by "A2 patch") and you can have shipyards that would be sweet

P.S. I will ask this to go into feature request
Logged


Cpt Ryan
Fleet Ops mob boss

Offline Offline

Posts: 1908


There is no spoon


« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2007, 12:10:46 PM »

suppose it could give a slight bonus to the amount of supply points, bought from a starbase in orbit of a planet, instead of a crew recruiting boost like in A1. Note: in A1 there was no colonizing, and still get a boost. makes no real sense to go and dump a load of civilians on a planet in a contested system.
Logged

"The past makes us who we are... forget your past and you have no future"-Me.. i think
"better to send 5 lions than 500 sheep"- some guy i can't remember
"DANCE FOOL!!... and make it a nice dance"- another guy i cant remember
Optec
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2007, 12:45:37 PM »

We do currently not feel comfortable with the idea of heaving the old armada2 colony system. There should be that many worlds and colonization takes decades and is more of civil then military nature.
We have plans to give the planets more importance after v3. Like trading with them or having starbases in the orbit which will allow you to access the special features of world, like research boni and the like Smiley But you will most probably find already colonized planets which you can expand then colonizing them your own.

But thats still just an idea and neither implemented nor fixed yet Smiley
Logged

Please support Fleet Operations by donating

Send a standard greeting... Full spread!
Dominus_Noctis

Offline Offline

Posts: 1983


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2007, 08:21:12 PM »

Sounds neat Optec! Does "plans" equal in progress... or ideas on the table? Either way, I look forward to it  Cheesy
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Meredith
Donator

Offline Offline

Posts: 298


^Seraphim^


WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2007, 09:10:25 PM »

sweet I hope so would be nice. like the idea that the planets are already colonized and you can trade with them but a building bonus would be sweet.
Logged


ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5502



WWW
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2007, 02:44:57 AM »

I just had a idea brace your selves!

What if you could all so destroy a planet? after its destruction it would explode in to a sun with orbiting astride, a black hole, a pulsar resores moon, smaller planets or a worm hole.
Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

Dominus_Noctis

Offline Offline

Posts: 1983


'Tis braver to live than to die.


« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2007, 03:11:24 AM »

hmmmm, sounds neat... but also really complicated. Plus, how would one planet give birth to two wormholes?
I would be interested to see what the effects of a pulsar would be... or a sun 
Logged

I have not yet begun to fight! -John Paul Jones
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Strength is irrelevant, resistance is futile.
Meredith
Donator

Offline Offline

Posts: 298


^Seraphim^


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2007, 05:58:50 AM »

ya I agree It would be very hard and not very realistic. a sun and a planet are very different. the main reasons the earth is so hot is because of the core spinning causing friction and the heat is not going any where. I dont think that a planet can become a star. and a black hole, no stars colaps into black holes and as I alredy said I dont think a planet could become a star, so a planet to a star to a black hole.... no. wormholes are definitely no we dont know how or why wormholes are made but we know they are not made from destroyed planets. now smaller planets maby and moon also.

one other thing for wormhole where whould the other end go?

one last thing what do you mean by explode? like in starwars the deathstar destroying a planet or what?
Logged


Blade
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 301



« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2007, 10:04:35 AM »

yeah like the death star but if poss it cud leave astroids (dnt think its possible tho
Logged
serpicus

Offline Offline

Posts: 309



« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2007, 04:22:17 PM »

No planet colonialization. Just kills the game. Has no meaning and the bombardment from orbit was mundane.
Logged

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day. (Richard II: III,ii)
Tyler
PvP Novice

Online Online

Posts: 273


"Great men are Conqerors, not Peacmakers!"


WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2007, 01:32:52 PM »

Although I agree about Colonies taking yars to make, and being done by Civil companies instead of Military, one of my favourite things about the regular A2 was defending outlying worlds from attackers.
Logged

"We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight!"
                        ~President Thomas Whitmore~


serpicus

Offline Offline

Posts: 309



« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2007, 03:59:48 PM »

well, if we had special attributes for planets such as boosts or resource bonuses, then yeah, defending them would certainly be worth the while, especially if we could have them impart different bonuses to different races - like shipbuilding speeds or resource collection etc.
But having them as mere colonisable balls in space would not be much fun. But since we are eager for V3, the planet thing can wait till V4 or a V3 patch
Logged

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay; the worst is death and death will have his day. (Richard II: III,ii)
ewm90
Good old dyslexic
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5502



WWW
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2007, 08:47:58 PM »

The other side could jump and be invisible

Well it was just a idea.

ya I agree It would be very hard and not very realistic. a sun and a planet are very different. the main reasons the earth is so hot is because of the core spinning causing friction and the heat is not going any where. I dont think that a planet can become a star. and a black hole, no stars colaps into black holes and as I alredy said I dont think a planet could become a star, so a planet to a star to a black hole.... no. wormholes are definitely no we dont know how or why wormholes are made but we know they are not made from destroyed planets. now smaller planets maby and moon also.

one other thing for wormhole where whould the other end go?

one last thing what do you mean by explode? like in starwars the deathstar destroying a planet or what?

Logged

Landmark Education: Seminars, Courses & Landmark Forum

         - ----------------------------- I voted for ------------------------------ -

Pages: [1] 2 3
  Send this topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

© 2003-2008 DOCa Cola. All rights reserved.
Star Trek and related marks are trademarks of Paramount Pictures.
Powered by Joomla
Powered by SMF 1.1.6 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com